Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Eastern Promises (Log · Page History) |
| User | Steve (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 18 |
| Minor edits | 9 (50%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (5.6%) |
| atbe1 | 11.3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 1,587 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -282 |
Minor edits
·
9 (50%)
Major edits
·
9 (50%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
18 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (5.6%)
Unreverted edits
·
17 (94.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-04-08 14:17 | Diff · History | 6 | +film |
| 2008-04-08 14:17 | Diff · History | -86 | Removed clunky wording. "Crime drama" alone covers all those genres well enough |
| 2008-02-15 23:26 | Diff · History | 36 | Reverted 1 edit by 70.108.199.3; The lead is a summary of the article. That line is a paraphrase of a section which appears later on in the article. Though a word other than "shocking" may be appropriate. |
| 2008-02-12 14:25 | Diff · History | -83 | Reverted 1 edit by 41.233.148.123; Spam. |
| 2008-02-09 00:01 | Diff · History | 34 | Reverted 1 edit by MwNNrules; OK, I've thought about it for a while and this should be mentioned as per WP:LEAD, as long as the section on tattoos remains in the article. |
| 2008-01-31 16:30 | Diff · History | 73 | →Release: replaced missing cite, though the regular caretakers of this article should be made aware that the use of imdb as a source for these things is frowned upon |
| 2008-01-31 16:29 | Diff · History | 36 | Strictly speaking, this is necessary as per WP:LEAD - it should please Pixelface, but it should be noted that if the Director's Comments section is removed, this must be too |
| 2008-01-31 16:22 | Diff · History | -107 | Reverted 2 edits by 216.143.51.66; Removed links to not-especially-notable reviews of the film as per WP:EL. |
| 2008-01-31 09:16 | Diff · History | 2 | fixed ital |
| 2008-01-31 09:15 | Diff · History | 68 | ah, now I see why we had this in - the red link |
| 2008-01-31 09:14 | Diff · History | 804 | punched up the lead to better reflect article content |
| 2008-01-31 09:02 | Diff · History | 0 | →Release: update BO |
| 2008-01-22 14:53 | Diff · History | -5 | →Awards and nominations: rw |
| 2008-01-22 14:50 | Diff · History | 126 | →Awards and nominations: fixed |
| 2008-01-20 00:57 | Diff · History | 0 | fixed link |
| 2008-01-06 00:27 | Diff · History | -7 | (reverted) →Plot: the film is primary source; it can be verified by *watching the film*. How is using a primary source like this different to my citing and paraphrasing a secondary source? |
| 2007-09-17 11:48 | Diff · History | -1 | Guidelines state the release date listed should be that of its first appearance, including festivals |
| 2007-09-17 07:49 | Diff · History | 402 | Added recent Toronto win |
All times are in UTC.