Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources (Log · Page History) |
| User | SamuelRiv (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 20 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (5%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 43.9 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 16,753 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -190 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
20 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (5%)
Manual edits
·
19 (95%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
20 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 16:40 | Diff · History | 742 | →Newspapers: on passive forces and accountability |
| 2024-09-09 12:39 | Diff · History | 578 | →Newspapers: Reply |
| 2024-09-07 00:54 | Diff · History | 620 | →Newspapers: Reply |
| 2024-09-06 04:25 | Diff · History | 1,716 | →Newspapers: good rule of thumb for first years; going through more complexity with an example |
| 2023-12-13 06:26 | Diff · History | 403 | →Use of AI content generation by previously reliable sources: The new AI is less than a year old. |
| 2023-12-06 15:32 | Diff · History | 330 | →Use of AI content generation by previously reliable sources: Reply |
| 2023-12-04 01:40 | Diff · History | 830 | →Use of AI content generation by previously reliable sources: Can someone explain what's changed |
| 2023-08-16 23:54 | Diff · History | 896 | →Citing master's thesis for its primary sources: Yeah dude, citing the internal citation without reviewing it yourself -- that's plagiarism |
| 2022-08-29 01:26 | Diff · History | 1,210 | →Objection to "Definition of published": 2006 RfC, and hypothetical to understand what "archives" are |
| 2022-08-28 22:32 | Diff · History | 50 | →Objection to "Definition of published": self-edit to clarify i'm responding specifically to the site you linked |
| 2022-08-28 22:29 | Diff · History | 962 | →Objection to "Definition of published": WP's definition of 'published' is quite generous -- if it's legally accessible, and I could legally look over your shoulder as you access it, then it's probably published, regardless of how difficult it is to get access. |
| 2022-08-28 22:18 | Diff · History | 645 | →Preventing Ad Hominem: This isn't helpful. |
| 2022-08-26 16:20 | Diff · History | 458 | →Preventing Ad Hominem: copyedit outside my post, because this makes a great point. WP:CONFUSING... or is it WP:CONFUSION? or WP:CONFUSE? Well, surely they don't ''all'' redirect to ''different'' guidelines, because that would be insane! |
| 2022-08-26 16:16 | Diff · History | 952 | →Preventing Ad Hominem: Just removed the "published" definition section, as it's triplicated in wl policy already and only tangentially relevant |
| 2022-08-17 05:41 | Diff · History | -190 | Undid revision 1104842003 by 223.24.164.19 (talk) rvv, but wouldn't you know just today I added info to Help:Link on how to sanitize section wikilinking? |
| 2022-08-16 02:15 | Diff · History | 1,393 | →Conference papers: Feels like it's worth saying that it depends, with some examples |
| 2022-07-04 04:01 | Diff · History | 3,287 | →Abstracts and editorial discipline: it will take me waaay longer to trim this comment than to just click "publish" so deal with it |
| 2022-05-20 16:36 | Diff · History | 347 | →Abstracts and editorial discipline: reality |
| 2022-05-20 16:11 | Diff · History | 893 | →Abstracts and editorial discipline: new section |
| 2022-05-20 15:45 | Diff · History | 441 | →Using a MA thesis: Being an MA thesis is not evidence for reliability, but having citations is |
All times are in UTC.