Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back PresNWolfenstein 3D • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wolfenstein 3D (Log · Page History)
User PresN (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 210
Minor edits 65 (31%)
(Semi-)automated edits 40 (19%)
Reverted edits 7 (3.3%)
atbe1 14.7
Added (bytes)2 14,882
Deleted (bytes) -21,696
Minor edits · 65 (31%)
Major edits · 145 (69%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 40 (19%)
Manual edits · 170 (81%)
Reverted edits · 7 (3.3%)
Unreverted edits · 203 (96.7%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 0
Diff · History 14 Undid revision 1268222242 by 2A02:2F0D:C0B:C300:A5B9:9C1B:407B:29F3 (talk)
Diff · History 12 And it's wrong to do so; MOS:SENTENCECAPS and MOS:TMCAPS make it clear that this isn't like an iPad, just a styling the company prefers. In any case, changing so it's not the first word.
Diff · History 0 (reverted)  Undid revision 1260544658 by Nixinova (talk) while id stylizes the name as lowercase, that doesn't override capitalizing the start of a sentence
Diff · History -358 The faq cite was for the 1995 bit, not the 2009 bit, that's the other source that you didn't replace
Diff · History -17 Undid revision 1259710868 by 64.141.109.243 (talk) true, but not in source cited
Diff · History 1 Undid revision 1257344550 by Sgt.McHale (talk) None of those are contemporary reviews, which is why it was in the retrospective section
Diff · History -290 Undid revision 1246039408 by Timixion (talk) unsourced content about mods with no context or proof of notability given
Diff · History -4 Undid revision 1243732548 by 2803:9800:98C0:7DDA:2520:5FD0:5442:663A (talk) the game does not call it an assault rifle
Diff · History 0 Development:
Diff · History 0 Development:
Diff · History 0
Diff · History -53 nope, the infobox "who made this" fields are for the original release, not later ports
Diff · History -5 Undid revision 1188897888 by 2A02:3032:305:5217:DA1:E36F:B93B:5813 (talk)
Diff · History -4
Diff · History 0 Legacy:
Diff · History 1 Legacy:
Diff · History 383 References:
Diff · History -351 Legacy:
Diff · History 1 Reception:
Diff · History -54 Reception:
Diff · History 0 Release:
Diff · History -31 Release:
Diff · History 28 Development:
Diff · History 16 Development:
Diff · History 0 fix double link and missing link
Diff · History -36 The method the engine uses to draw things is not an important part of gameplay
Diff · History -2,632 Remove VG reviews table. The table, when included, is meant to be a summary of the contemporary reviews used in the text next to it. It makes sense for releases that get a lot of scored reviews at the time, to give a clear summary. In this case, the table has no contemporary reviews, only decades-later ports and retro-reviews, which doesn't serve the audience and isn't what the table is meant for
Diff · History -82 if it's not banned from sale, then it's available to be sold
Diff · History -3
Diff · History -470 condensing
Diff · History -3 Undid revision 1150271963 by 76.94.209.63 (talk) unnecessary
Diff · History 74
Diff · History -16
Diff · History -7
Diff · History -186 undo - a game being sold (for free) in a new store 30 years after release is not notable
Diff · History -10
Diff · History -191 Undid revision 1105808541 by 2A00:23C6:41C6:2701:F979:83:D296:8C80 (talk) a 30 year old game being sold in a new way on the same platform is not a big deal
Diff · History -300 undo - Flux was a minor magazine that ran for 7 issues and wasn't even video game-focused. It's "best of" list is trivia.
Diff · History -163 Revert to revision 1099627123 dated 2022-07-21 19:53:43 by PresN using popups
Diff · History -156 Undid revision 1099626723 by 84.212.211.211 (talk) rv per WP:ELNO - no fansite linkspam
Diff · History -8 Undid revision 1087453665 by CoolingGibbon (talk) Nope, they're sources used in the References section
Diff · History -21 As per Template:Infobox video game: "Only use this field for those engines listed in Category:Video game engines". Yeah, Wolfenstein 3D engine redirects somewhere- to here. To this article.
Diff · History 70 moving sentence to somewhere... actually related, and rephrasing
Diff · History -309
Diff · History -33 (reverted)  As per Template:Infobox video game: "Only use this field for those engines listed in Category:Video game engines, either engines with an established, independent article (such as Unreal Engine), or those that have a redirect to their own section on an appropriate developer or series page."
Diff · History 115
Diff · History -15 Undid revision 1072608638 by Hpnzii (talk) overdetailed
Diff · History 36
Diff · History 0 Revert to revision 1055279309 dated 2021-11-14 23:37:53 by Rlink2 using popups
Diff · History -187 Undid revision 1055194386 by 75.115.38.165 (talk) rvv
Diff · History -11 Development: earlier use of "copyright" is also wrong- wold3d does not use any copyrighted gameplay elements, it uses the Wolfenstein name; also, while one source says the trademark lapsed after Muse shut down 1986, it must not have because what then did id buy in 1992?
Diff · History -644 Undid revision 1033200388 by Nitheesh Yevan (talk) There were a ton of games like that; the article just lists a few that were notable enough to get articles
Diff · History -139 removing a few details that aren't relevant to Wolf3D
Diff · History -209 Release: internet archive says it was gone within years, though problems with the archived age gate is making it difficult to track down exactly when
Diff · History -434 Already had a sentence about that a few later; that source appears to be summarized excerpts from Kushner's book, which is already cited for that sentence
Diff · History -58 (reverted) 
Diff · History -380 (reverted)  It's three lives (just checked, at least for the default difficulty level) and the plot section already links the Holy Lance
Diff · History 17 sentences need verbs
Diff · History -17 Undid revision 1012533943 by 2601:645:8200:C0D0:9125:FC2A:92F9:F387 (talk) not in source
Diff · History -39
Diff · History -12 References:
Diff · History 0 Reception:
Diff · History 4 Reception:
Diff · History -1,057 Undid revision 1005026477 by 2600:1014:B01E:9CDA:2472:C9DC:CE4A:4E0E (talk) Neither GR nor MC existed when this game came out, and presenting a skewed 15+year later aggregation of port reviews isn't helpful to readers
Diff · History 73 Development history:
Diff · History -81 Undid revision 967669157 by 2001:4C4C:1265:CB00:C938:4AF4:B32E:2554 (talk) rv unofficial fansite
Diff · History -8 (reverted)  Undid revision 959484000 by 1.128.109.20 (talk) "Development" is the standard term for these sections on WP
Diff · History -357 Undid revision 952741566 by Deltasim (talk) This does not appear to be a reliable source, and is way too much detail- neither the exact resolution change of one port nor the name of the person who did them is relevant.
Diff · History -193 condensing a bit
Diff · History -408 Honestly, I know Carmack talked it up in interviews at the time, but the fact he coded on a NeXT computer is trivial- the game was released for IBM-compatible computers, which could do VGA just as well. He didn't need to, he just thought it was more powerful than the IBM PCs he had access to at the time.
Diff · History 1 Release:
Diff · History -839 Release: refactored Release- 2 of the paragraphs said the same things with different levels of detail
Diff · History 20
Diff · History -117 what computer the hint manual was written on is trivia
Diff · History -70 Undid revision 936969556 by 104.246.223.15 (talk) already covered more clearly in the development section
Diff · History -121 change borland- that was the compiler, they wrote it in ANSI C; rmv night missions, that was just one name idea they came up with before deciding; 4-chain VGA needs an explanation and is about too-detailed engine stuff
Diff · History -27
Diff · History 78
Diff · History -19
Diff · History -23 Rolling back a few versions- the newest edits just finds a wordier way to say the same thing, and the release date change is unsourced
Diff · History -50 External links: portals are pretty useless to start with, but Germany / Fascism have basically nothing to do with this article (same with speculative fiction / united states
Diff · History -27 Undid revision 914862701 by 2603:9000:9507:E00:2CD9:C95:CB2A:10CC (talk) id wasn't the one insisting on the censorship; that wouldn't make much sense
Diff · History -418 Undid revision 912252493 by Deltasim (talk) I don't think a magazine publisher having a giveaway of a game is very notable, unless there's some context I'm missing...
Diff · History 6
Diff · History 114
Diff · History -12 Undid revision 890626538 by 209.174.178.134 (talk)
Diff · History -92 lets keep the genre legacy stuff together, though it could be stronger, yeah
Diff · History -28
Diff · History 85 moving that review to be with the other "more modern" reviews, as it's for the 2009 xbox 360 port
Diff · History 0
Diff · History -4
Diff · History -59 Sources:
Diff · History -53
Diff · History -441
Diff · History -40 ah, yeah, when they say immersive they're referring to the overall experience, so not a good direct quote for just sound and music. De-quoting, but leaving the word, as it's a valid shortening of "pulling the player deeper into the experience"
Diff · History -24
Diff · History -134
Diff · History -52
Diff · History 1
Diff · History -365 mobygames is no an RS; as a non-JP game we don't need 3 versions of the JP name for 1 port; rework German ban reversal stuff
Diff · History -395 mmm, I don't think that site is an RS- it appears to be a non-comericial blog with 4 non-notable writers. Do you have any evidence of it being an RS?
Diff · History 25
Diff · History -171
Diff · History 22 tweak- Romero claims they heard about the texture mapping in Fall 1990, and in mid-1991 Carmack gave it a go; regardless of the date, a small wording tweak keeps the meaning without stating that he first learned of it in 1991
Diff · History -64
Diff · History -1,176 I don't think this needs a review table when we don't have a solid set of scored reviews. I'm also hesitant about the SoD funding- the source has several innacuracies in that graphic, and why would Apogee fund SoD if it was published through FormGen?
Diff · History -9
Diff · History 876
Diff · History 272 tweaks
Diff · History -9
Diff · History 0
Diff · History 41
Diff · History -157 Undid revision 840077625 by 107.77.229.127 (talk) - 2 points: 1) [http://www.digitpress.com/join_us.htm Digital Press] describes itself as a "Fanzine", and 'zines are of questional reliability. 2) Even if its an RS, that doesn't mean that it should be included- again, we already have 2 professional reviews for this 1-of-many-ports of the game. What does this review add?
Diff · History -157 (reverted)  While another Jaguar version review is appreciated, this magazine appears to be a very minor publication (with a hand-drawn cover art?) so I'm hesitant to use it at all, much less when we already have 2 professional reviews for that port
Diff · History 35 Huh, forgot to link Rein; there's no smooth way to note that he went from id to be VP at Epic Games, where he still is
Diff · History -36 Undid revision 834007673 by 49.187.37.77 (talk) ...it literally defined what the FPS genre was
Diff · History 47
Diff · History -992
Diff · History -32
Diff · History -9 tweak
Diff · History 684
Diff · History 877
Diff · History 177
Diff · History 16 Undid revision 808430504 by Glamgla (talk) in the original, he's Allied (read as American) with a Polish surname; it's not till later installments that his ancestry/history is fleshed out
Diff · History -401
Diff · History 354
Diff · History 0
Diff · History -21 Sources:
Diff · History 13 Undid revision 801653824 by 108.194.226.247 (talk) it's not redundant, it puts a useful title on the list instead of "List"
Diff · History -67 Undid revision 787219011 by Doommaster1994 (talk) while true, the infobox is mostly restricted to the non-ports of games to avoid overloading it with a million lines
Diff · History 45 Development: turns out it has a name
Diff · History -1 Undid revision 780659120 by 192.30.95.20 (talk)
Diff · History 43
Diff · History -26 Undid revision 779866479 by Cooc1501 (talk) there's no rifle in the game
Diff · History 72
Diff · History 1 Undid revision 779001577 by 105.230.156.33 (talk)
Diff · History -4 Undid revision 778945604 by CuriousEric (talk) linked in paragraph 1
Diff · History -6 rvv
Diff · History 0
Diff · History -67 Reverted edits by PresN (talk) to last version by MisfitToys
Diff · History 67 (reverted) 
Diff · History 68
Diff · History -7 Reverted edits by Geufeyiwhwyeye000 (talk) to last version by MisfitToys
Diff · History -4 Gameplay:
Diff · History -8 Undid revision 778846777 by 24.104.69.246 (talk) ...another false edit summary
Diff · History 0 Undoing a lot of 'fixes' that just made things wordier. Most of the 'severely fractured syntax' was grammatically correct, and you don't seem to know what the emdash is used for
Diff · History -58 Undid revision 778801278 by 1.180.235.38 (talk)
Diff · History -16 Undid revision 778338390 by 24.104.69.246 (talk) undid edit with false edit summary from May 2
Diff · History -11 reverting 2 edits with wrong changes (bad dates) or false edit summaries (no template was changed)
Diff · History -2 Reverted edits by Rowana Ranwosa (talk) to last version by Famous Hobo
Diff · History 1
Diff · History 0 Undid revision 774001682 by 76.187.107.29 (talk)Stylized as lowercase, and certinaly not all caps
Diff · History -12 Undid revision 773683912 by 74.105.136.127 (talk) "with a second trilogy [...] includes the episodes" ?
Diff · History 1,186 Reverted edits by Bigboybaki (talk) to last version by Shellwood
Diff · History -1 Reverted edits by 41.181.1.124 (talk) to last version by Shellwood
Diff · History 9 Reverted edits by Indra1986 (talk) to last version by Materialscientist
Diff · History -488 eh, that Nasir cite is talking about how his fast *programming* influenced the way id Software approached * programming*, not Wolf3d in particular. Better suited to the id article
Diff · History 165
Diff · History -21
Diff · History -7 Gameplay:
Diff · History -43 clean up the overuse of "game"
Diff · History 529
Diff · History -364
Diff · History -88 References:
Diff · History 1 Reception:
Diff · History 0 Legacy:
Diff · History -417 Undid revision 762826636 by Bill Hicks Jr. (talk) A review table with a single review from 20+ years later is not appropriate
Diff · History 728
Diff · History -11
Diff · History 737
Diff · History 101 Sources:
Diff · History 68 Plot:
Diff · History 46
Diff · History -38 Development:
Diff · History 5
Diff · History 428 alt text
Diff · History -85
Diff · History 1 Gameplay:
Diff · History 88
Diff · History 0 Development:
Diff · History 0 Reception:
Diff · History 1 Development:
Diff · History 35
Diff · History 30
Diff · History 0
Diff · History 33
Diff · History 426 PC Zone source "best shareware seller 1992"
Diff · History -116
Diff · History 3 Development:
Diff · History 83
Diff · History 8
Diff · History 16 External links:
Diff · History 1,462 References: archiving rest of online refs
Diff · History 1,975 References: archving some refs
Diff · History 0
Diff · History 34 Legacy:
Diff · History -99
Diff · History 10
Diff · History 3 Reception:
Diff · History 495 + Romero interview
Diff · History 69 Gameplay:
Diff · History -104 infobox releases to official releases only (read: not every platform every invented), and dropping even the attempt at region-specific release dates since it's already super long
Diff · History 44 top:
Diff · History 524 citing new Wolf games
Diff · History 0 Release:
Diff · History 685 Carmack Commentary video source
Diff · History 35
Diff · History -36 noting that Spear of Destiny (video game), Wolfenstein 3D engine, and Official versions of Wolfenstein 3D have been merged here
Diff · History -3,439 Copying over complete rewrite from User:PresN/Wolf - not quite done, but expected changes mainly adding new sources not present in old version and cleaning up refs
All times are in UTC.