Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Depp v. Heard (Log · Page History) |
User | PizzaMan (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 32 |
Minor edits | 1 (3.1%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 0.9 |
Added (bytes)2 | 2,756 |
Deleted (bytes) | -1,524 |
Minor edits
·
1 (3.1%)
Major edits
·
31 (96.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
32 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
32 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2022-06-16 13:37 | Diff · History | 22 | →Other reactions: |
2022-06-15 17:29 | Diff · History | 385 | →Other reactions: the end of #believeallwomen was argued in several sources. I added one. |
2022-06-05 10:53 | Diff · History | 58 | →Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo: |
2022-06-05 10:46 | Diff · History | -166 | →Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo: the final quote of the article is more about accused stars in general than about Depp |
2022-06-05 10:33 | Diff · History | 1,057 | →Social media: |
2022-06-05 10:33 | Diff · History | -1,057 | →Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo: moving this to where it belongs |
2022-06-03 23:01 | Diff · History | 5 | →Social media: majority didn't do justice to 502 out of "over 500" supporting Depp |
2022-06-03 22:55 | Diff · History | 36 | →Social media: |
2022-06-03 14:27 | Diff · History | -12 | The mere statement that Haeard will appeal doesn't warrant a separate section imho |
2022-06-03 14:23 | Diff · History | 6 | →Social media: |
2022-06-03 13:16 | Diff · History | -32 | →Appeal: |
2022-06-03 12:37 | Diff · History | 360 | →Trial: This should be moved elsewhere if expanded upon, but for now i think this is the best place. |
2022-06-03 12:26 | Diff · History | -110 | →Social media: |
2022-06-03 12:14 | Diff · History | -1 | →Verdict: |
2022-06-03 09:52 | Diff · History | -1 | →To the verdict: |
2022-06-03 09:51 | Diff · History | 0 | →To the verdict: more accurately reproduced phrasing of the source |
2022-06-03 09:49 | Diff · History | 442 | →To the verdict: |
2022-06-02 13:30 | Diff · History | 7 | →Social media: actually, spreading false info about the UK trial can barely be considered news, changed news to information |
2022-06-02 13:29 | Diff · History | -3 | correcting inserting "UK" in the wrong sentence |
2022-06-02 13:28 | Diff · History | 3 | →Social media: |
2022-06-02 13:27 | Diff · History | 3 | →Social media: and the misleading pointed out in the source was actually about the UK trial, not the US Depp v Heard trial |
2022-06-02 13:25 | Diff · History | -92 | →Social media: the phrasing "bias against heard" doesn't do justice to the outcome of the trial and the large majority public opinion. |
2022-06-01 20:57 | Diff · History | 5 | →Verdict: |
2022-06-01 20:55 | Diff · History | 1 | →Verdict: Changed ruling to outcome, as Depp himself said it was about the truth for him, more so than the outcome. |
2022-05-30 05:03 | Diff · History | 361 | →Court spectators: |
2022-05-29 22:55 | Diff · History | -11 | →Heard's legal team: |
2022-05-17 09:54 | Diff · History | -9 | →Reactions: |
2022-05-17 09:52 | Diff · History | -1 | →Week 5: |
2022-05-17 09:36 | Diff · History | -29 | →Week 3: guardian ref doens't mention wine |
2022-05-17 09:27 | Diff · History | 2 | →Week 3: |
2022-05-17 09:16 | Diff · History | 1 | →Week 2: |
2022-05-17 08:52 | Diff · History | 2 | →Pre-trial developments: |
All times are in UTC.