Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back PizzaManDepp v. Heard • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Depp v. Heard (Log · Page History)
User PizzaMan (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 32
Minor edits 1 (3.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 0.9
Added (bytes)2 2,756
Deleted (bytes) -1,524
Minor edits · 1 (3.1%)
Major edits · 31 (96.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 32 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 32 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 22 Other reactions:
Diff · History 385 Other reactions: the end of #believeallwomen was argued in several sources. I added one.
Diff · History 58 Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo:
Diff · History -166 Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo: the final quote of the article is more about accused stars in general than about Depp
Diff · History 1,057 Social media:
Diff · History -1,057 Other reactions, including effect on #MeToo: moving this to where it belongs
Diff · History 5 Social media: majority didn't do justice to 502 out of "over 500" supporting Depp
Diff · History 36 Social media:
Diff · History -12 The mere statement that Haeard will appeal doesn't warrant a separate section imho
Diff · History 6 Social media:
Diff · History -32 Appeal:
Diff · History 360 Trial: This should be moved elsewhere if expanded upon, but for now i think this is the best place.
Diff · History -110 Social media:
Diff · History -1 Verdict:
Diff · History -1 To the verdict:
Diff · History 0 To the verdict: more accurately reproduced phrasing of the source
Diff · History 442 To the verdict:
Diff · History 7 Social media: actually, spreading false info about the UK trial can barely be considered news, changed news to information
Diff · History -3 correcting inserting "UK" in the wrong sentence
Diff · History 3 Social media:
Diff · History 3 Social media: and the misleading pointed out in the source was actually about the UK trial, not the US Depp v Heard trial
Diff · History -92 Social media: the phrasing "bias against heard" doesn't do justice to the outcome of the trial and the large majority public opinion.
Diff · History 5 Verdict:
Diff · History 1 Verdict: Changed ruling to outcome, as Depp himself said it was about the truth for him, more so than the outcome.
Diff · History 361 Court spectators:
Diff · History -11 Heard's legal team:
Diff · History -9 Reactions:
Diff · History -1 Week 5:
Diff · History -29 Week 3: guardian ref doens't mention wine
Diff · History 2 Week 3:
Diff · History 1 Week 2:
Diff · History 2 Pre-trial developments:
All times are in UTC.