Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Wikipedia talk:Notability (Log · Page History) |
| User | Pixelface (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 213 |
| Minor edits | 28 (13.1%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 2 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 290,445 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -555 |
Minor edits
·
28 (13.1%)
Major edits
·
185 (86.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
213 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
213 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-04-08 08:41 | Diff · History | 1 | →Non-notable content within existing articles: fixed indent |
| 2009-04-08 08:41 | Diff · History | 615 | →Non-notable content within existing articles: reply to thumperward |
| 2009-04-08 06:35 | Diff · History | 37 | →Non-notable content within existing articles: add bit to clarify |
| 2009-04-08 06:34 | Diff · History | 299 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Reyk |
| 2009-04-08 06:24 | Diff · History | 354 | →Non-notable content within existing articles: reply to Wikieditor1988 |
| 2009-04-08 06:10 | Diff · History | 1,295 | →Castor and Pollux: reply to Reyk |
| 2009-04-08 05:39 | Diff · History | -1 | →Castor and Pollux: fixed indent |
| 2009-04-08 05:39 | Diff · History | 292 | →Castor and Pollux: reply to TheRedPenOfDoom |
| 2009-04-07 23:45 | Diff · History | 923 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-07 23:29 | Diff · History | 370 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-07 23:24 | Diff · History | 372 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to pd_THOR |
| 2009-04-07 23:15 | Diff · History | 546 | →Notability is not inherited: changed two colons to asterisks, reply to Randomran |
| 2009-04-07 23:05 | Diff · History | 905 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Esasus |
| 2009-04-07 22:45 | Diff · History | 3,703 | →Support: reply to Masem |
| 2009-04-07 22:31 | Diff · History | 151 | →Castor and Pollux: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-04 09:20 | Diff · History | 233 | →Support: reply to Masem |
| 2009-04-04 09:13 | Diff · History | 665 | →Nutshell: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-04 09:00 | Diff · History | 534 | →Nutshell: reply to patsw |
| 2009-04-04 08:50 | Diff · History | 144 | →Replacement word: reply to Masem |
| 2009-04-04 08:47 | Diff · History | 220 | →Arb. Break: "Local sources": reply to DreamGuy |
| 2009-04-04 08:43 | Diff · History | 358 | →Notability of article content: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-04 08:38 | Diff · History | 393 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-04-04 08:31 | Diff · History | 389 | →Increasing the archive time from 7 days: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-04-04 08:26 | Diff · History | 1,014 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-04-02 07:19 | Diff · History | 365 | new section: Increasing the archive time from 7 days |
| 2009-03-28 21:50 | Diff · History | 413 | →Support: reply to Reyk |
| 2009-03-25 21:40 | Diff · History | 222 | →Suggested recommendation for adjusting the philosophical approach of notability: reply to Vassyana |
| 2009-03-25 21:34 | Diff · History | 5,304 | →Suggested recommendation for adjusting the philosophical approach of notability: reply to Masem |
| 2009-03-25 20:22 | Diff · History | 235 | →Support: reply to Masem |
| 2009-03-25 02:29 | Diff · History | 1,667 | →Notability requires objective evidence: another reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-23 01:38 | Diff · History | 544 | →Support: reply to Rd232 |
| 2009-03-23 01:24 | Diff · History | 1 | →Support: fix indent on my reply |
| 2009-03-23 01:23 | Diff · History | 173 | →Support: reply to Masem |
| 2009-03-23 01:21 | Diff · History | 610 | →Support: reply to Reyk |
| 2009-03-23 00:42 | Diff · History | 1,565 | →Nutshell: reply to SharkD |
| 2009-03-23 00:37 | Diff · History | 230 | →Support: reply to Bignole |
| 2009-03-22 17:15 | Diff · History | 862 | →Support: reply to Black Kite |
| 2009-03-22 16:51 | Diff · History | 3,425 | →Support: reply to Masem |
| 2009-03-22 05:21 | Diff · History | 847 | →Notability of article content: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-22 05:00 | Diff · History | 3,882 | →Support: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-18 15:45 | Diff · History | 3,162 | →Support: added # in front of Fram's comment, comment by Pixelface |
| 2009-03-17 06:11 | Diff · History | 263 | →What makes a video game (especially an on line game) notable: reply to Blueboar |
| 2009-03-17 05:04 | Diff · History | 408 | →notability != importance: reply to TerraFrost |
| 2009-03-17 04:59 | Diff · History | 240 | →Request for comment: reply to Phenylalanine |
| 2009-03-17 04:55 | Diff · History | 640 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-17 04:46 | Diff · History | 1,323 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-17 04:26 | Diff · History | 576 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-03-12 08:31 | Diff · History | 1 | →TV and TV episode notability: fix wikilink, for > to |
| 2009-03-12 08:28 | Diff · History | 2,136 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-12 08:14 | Diff · History | 188 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-12 08:10 | Diff · History | 302 | →Multiple trivial references add up to real reference? Wrong, right?: reply to DreamGuy |
| 2009-03-12 08:07 | Diff · History | 1,450 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-03-12 07:47 | Diff · History | 447 | →Notability of article content: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-12 07:40 | Diff · History | -1 | →Notability of article content: fixed italic |
| 2009-03-12 07:39 | Diff · History | 711 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-03-12 07:34 | Diff · History | 480 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-12 07:21 | Diff · History | 1,800 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-12 07:03 | Diff · History | 856 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Kubigula |
| 2009-03-12 06:19 | Diff · History | 495 | →Nutshell: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-12 06:13 | Diff · History | 47,730 | unarchived 1 thread |
| 2009-03-12 06:10 | Diff · History | 2 | changing archive time from 7 to 14d |
| 2009-03-12 06:02 | Diff · History | 2,246 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-12 05:41 | Diff · History | 2 | →TV and TV episode notability: fixed 3 typos |
| 2009-03-12 05:39 | Diff · History | 9,597 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-06 08:27 | Diff · History | 1,194 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-03-04 09:08 | Diff · History | 1,250 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-04 08:23 | Diff · History | 626 | →Wording: reply to Fram |
| 2009-03-04 07:19 | Diff · History | 1,229 | →TV and TV episode notability: reply to Nightscream |
| 2009-02-27 12:22 | Diff · History | 0 | →Wording: four > five |
| 2009-02-27 12:21 | Diff · History | 2,533 | →Wording: reply to Equazcion |
| 2009-02-27 10:29 | Diff · History | 2,090 | →Wording: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-02-27 09:46 | Diff · History | 2,711 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-27 08:17 | Diff · History | 928 | →Notability of article content: reply to Equazcion |
| 2009-02-25 02:10 | Diff · History | 844 | →Notability of article content: reply to Equazcion |
| 2009-02-25 01:58 | Diff · History | 928 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-25 01:33 | Diff · History | 427 | →Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines: reply to Chillum, reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-21 05:55 | Diff · History | 0 | →Nutshell: that > what |
| 2009-02-21 05:53 | Diff · History | 958 | →Nutshell: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-02-21 05:38 | Diff · History | 1 | →Notability of article content: fixed a bold |
| 2009-02-21 05:34 | Diff · History | 4,900 | →Notability of article content: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-20 22:10 | Diff · History | 2,269 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-20 21:42 | Diff · History | 2,313 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-20 20:13 | Diff · History | 2,251 | →Nutshell: reply to Someguy1221 |
| 2009-02-20 17:01 | Diff · History | 216 | →Currently disputed sections: reply to Someguy1221 |
| 2009-02-20 16:54 | Diff · History | 984 | →Notability of article content: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-02-20 16:42 | Diff · History | 299 | →Nutshell: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-02-20 15:36 | Diff · History | 3,783 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Fram |
| 2009-02-20 14:40 | Diff · History | 315 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-20 13:56 | Diff · History | 929 | →Notability requires objective evidence: reply to Someguy1221 |
| 2009-02-20 13:01 | Diff · History | -29 | →Notability of article content: fixed a category link |
| 2009-02-20 12:59 | Diff · History | 295 | →Currently disputed sections: turned them into level 3 headings again, added my sig to each section |
| 2009-02-20 12:33 | Diff · History | 0 | →Currently disputed sections: fix oldid |
| 2009-02-20 12:32 | Diff · History | -20 | →Currently disputed sections: changing level 3 headings to semicolons |
| 2009-02-20 12:29 | Diff · History | 2,449 | new section: Currently disputed sections |
| 2009-02-20 12:06 | Diff · History | 434 | →Wording: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2009-02-20 12:02 | Diff · History | 197 | →Wording: reply to Equazcion |
| 2009-02-17 08:42 | Diff · History | 368 | →General interest: reply to thumperward |
| 2009-02-17 08:32 | Diff · History | 171 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to TheRedPenOfDoom |
| 2009-02-17 08:10 | Diff · History | 2,315 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-11 11:07 | Diff · History | 743 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to Norse Am Legend |
| 2009-02-11 01:25 | Diff · History | 1,239 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to Norse Am Legend |
| 2009-02-10 23:57 | Diff · History | 137 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to thumperward |
| 2009-02-10 23:55 | Diff · History | 404 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to Norse Am Legend |
| 2009-02-10 06:17 | Diff · History | 296 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to davidwr |
| 2009-02-10 06:14 | Diff · History | 727 | →Shouldn't there be a Notability guideline for TV?: reply to Norse Am Legend |
| 2009-02-09 04:32 | Diff · History | 120 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to MichaelQSchmidt |
| 2009-02-09 04:03 | Diff · History | 763 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-09 03:30 | Diff · History | 447 | →Re-evaluate WP:N?: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-07 01:15 | Diff · History | 620 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Masem |
| 2009-02-06 05:05 | Diff · History | 956 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Soundvisions1 |
| 2009-02-06 03:59 | Diff · History | 9,153 | →What is still in dispute?: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-06 03:05 | Diff · History | 758 | →What is still in dispute?: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-06 02:29 | Diff · History | 902 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to A Man In Black |
| 2009-02-05 20:46 | Diff · History | 1,300 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Soundvisions1 again |
| 2009-02-05 20:19 | Diff · History | 245 | →What is still in dispute?: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-05 20:17 | Diff · History | 808 | →What is still in dispute?: reply to Randomran |
| 2009-02-05 19:59 | Diff · History | 4,922 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Aaron Brenneman |
| 2009-02-05 08:23 | Diff · History | 620 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Soundvisions1 |
| 2009-02-05 08:19 | Diff · History | 672 | →The reach of this guideline at AFD: reply to Someguy1221 |
| 2009-02-05 08:07 | Diff · History | 512 | →What is still in dispute?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-31 09:00 | Diff · History | 3,015 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-31 07:16 | Diff · History | 1,531 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran, typo on Article |
| 2008-12-31 01:54 | Diff · History | -3 | →Proposed wording: fixed link to a username, A not A (period) |
| 2008-12-31 01:51 | Diff · History | 3,618 | →Proposed wording: reply to Masem |
| 2008-12-30 23:32 | Diff · History | 1,912 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-30 23:12 | Diff · History | 1,060 | →Term of art vs. common usage: reply to Masem |
| 2008-12-23 02:56 | Diff · History | 448 | →Proposed wording: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-20 06:09 | Diff · History | 2,641 | →Proposed wording: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-19 02:13 | Diff · History | 2,661 | →Proposed wording: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-17 20:50 | Diff · History | 2,371 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-17 00:55 | Diff · History | 802 | →Proposed wording: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-17 00:41 | Diff · History | 651 | →Proposed wording: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2008-12-16 23:55 | Diff · History | 3,145 | →Term of art vs. common usage: reply to Masem |
| 2008-12-16 23:21 | Diff · History | 836 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-15 23:49 | Diff · History | 1,284 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-15 23:00 | Diff · History | 338 | →Term of art vs. common usage: reply to RJC |
| 2008-12-15 22:55 | Diff · History | 852 | →Term of art vs. common usage: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-15 19:33 | Diff · History | 87 | →Term of art vs. common usage: link to AFD for notability |
| 2008-12-15 19:28 | Diff · History | 3,087 | →Term of art vs. common usage: reply to Phil Sandifer |
| 2008-12-15 15:57 | Diff · History | -77 | →A way forward?: removed my link to signif |
| 2008-12-15 15:51 | Diff · History | 1,859 | →A way forward?: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-15 15:13 | Diff · History | 545 | →Remove the Disputed Tag: comment by Pixelface |
| 2008-12-15 08:04 | Diff · History | 143 | →Article contents: comment by Pixelface |
| 2008-12-15 08:02 | Diff · History | 6,955 | →Article contents: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-15 00:36 | Diff · History | 916 | →NNC again: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2008-12-14 23:56 | Diff · History | 330 | →Article contents: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-14 23:52 | Diff · History | 312 | →Article contents: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-12 06:14 | Diff · History | 600 | →NNC again: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2008-12-09 23:30 | Diff · History | -16 | →Not a news source: news reports going back to > news since |
| 2008-12-09 23:24 | Diff · History | 1,095 | →Not a news source: reply to Copysan |
| 2008-12-09 13:52 | Diff · History | 3 | →NNC again: fixed a typo |
| 2008-12-09 13:50 | Diff · History | 340 | →NNC again: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-07 15:48 | Diff · History | 920 | →Troubled: reply to Masem |
| 2008-12-07 15:24 | Diff · History | 872 | →NNC again: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-07 15:14 | Diff · History | 1,142 | →NNC again: reply to Gavin.collins |
| 2008-12-04 13:02 | Diff · History | -400 | →Does notability have to be in the real-world?: removed my reply to Drilnoth, Drilnoth started that thread |
| 2008-12-04 12:54 | Diff · History | 400 | →Does notability have to be in the real-world?: reply to Drilnoth |
| 2008-12-04 12:48 | Diff · History | 612 | →NNC again: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-12-03 10:57 | Diff · History | 678 | →NNC again: reply to Gavin.collins, reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-26 11:26 | Diff · History | 2,033 | →NNC again: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-24 10:24 | Diff · History | 1,828 | new section: NNC again |
| 2008-11-13 05:45 | Diff · History | 2,967 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-13 04:31 | Diff · History | -2 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: subjects > topics, hope that's more clear |
| 2008-11-13 03:49 | Diff · History | 4 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: give a > give it a |
| 2008-11-13 03:46 | Diff · History | 2,702 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-13 02:34 | Diff · History | 2,946 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-13 02:25 | Diff · History | 2,142 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-13 01:45 | Diff · History | 811 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: another reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-13 00:28 | Diff · History | 94 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: clarify this comment |
| 2008-11-13 00:24 | Diff · History | 737 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-12 23:40 | Diff · History | -4 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: fix link to buro |
| 2008-11-12 23:38 | Diff · History | -1 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: the > be |
| 2008-11-12 23:37 | Diff · History | 2,477 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-10 22:55 | Diff · History | 1,777 | →NNC: Randomran/Phil Sandifer: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-11-02 07:18 | Diff · History | 8 | →RfC results: oppose > oppose and neutral |
| 2008-11-02 07:07 | Diff · History | 10,558 | →RfC results: reply to Masem |
| 2008-10-27 12:11 | Diff · History | 446 | →RfC results: reply to Masem again |
| 2008-10-27 12:07 | Diff · History | 12 | →RfC results: +since then |
| 2008-10-27 12:04 | Diff · History | 1,099 | →RfC results: reply to Masem |
| 2008-10-27 11:49 | Diff · History | 1,255 | →Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced.: reply to Masem |
| 2008-10-22 06:25 | Diff · History | 51 | →Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced.: add a bit |
| 2008-10-22 06:22 | Diff · History | 897 | →Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced.: reply to Masem |
| 2008-10-21 04:05 | Diff · History | 136 | →Moving forward on "notability" of non-notable lists: reply to Masem |
| 2008-10-14 10:09 | Diff · History | 341 | →Once again, there is a difference between non-notable and non-referenced.: reply to Maury Markowitz |
| 2008-09-20 03:39 | Diff · History | 1,633 | →Proposal B: If renamed, then...: reply by Pixelface |
| 2008-09-20 03:26 | Diff · History | 1,100 | →Rename proposal: reply by Pixelface |
| 2008-07-02 03:13 | Diff · History | 506 | →Superfluous: reply to Kww |
| 2008-07-02 02:59 | Diff · History | 359 | →Look, we've got to clear up this contradiction: reply to Kww |
| 2008-07-02 02:50 | Diff · History | 5,846 | →Look, we've got to clear up this contradiction: reply to Sephiroth BCR |
| 2008-07-02 02:17 | Diff · History | 661 | →Look, we've got to clear up this contradiction: reply to Phil Sandifer |
| 2008-07-02 01:47 | Diff · History | 0 | →Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters: 2006 not 2005 |
| 2008-07-02 01:43 | Diff · History | 1,072 | →Another proposal: reply to Kww |
| 2008-07-02 01:14 | Diff · History | 506 | →A more serious proposal: reply to Kww |
| 2008-07-01 22:28 | Diff · History | -1 | →Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters: criterion > criteria |
| 2008-07-01 21:22 | Diff · History | 2,387 | →Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters: reply to Sephiroth BCR |
| 2008-07-01 19:59 | Diff · History | 1,492 | →Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters: reply to Randomran |
| 2008-07-01 19:36 | Diff · History | 5,542 | →Why inclusion of fictional subjects matters: reply to Sephiroth BCR |
| 2008-05-22 09:11 | Diff · History | 1,974 | →Improvements Needed: reply to Coolcaesar |
| 2008-04-07 20:43 | Diff · History | 709 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Black Kite |
| 2008-04-07 20:36 | Diff · History | 137 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Percy Snoodle |
| 2008-04-07 20:35 | Diff · History | 0 | →Notability is not inherited: fixed a typo |
| 2008-04-07 20:34 | Diff · History | 446 | →Notability is not inherited: reply to Phirazo |
| 2008-03-24 05:35 | Diff · History | 921 | →Troublesome loophole: reply to Wassupwestcoast |
| 2008-03-20 07:00 | Diff · History | 213 | →Eh? Notability is (still) a guideline?: reply to Kim Bruning |
| 2008-03-20 06:21 | Diff · History | 275 | →Eh? Notability is (still) a guideline?: reply to Masem |
| 2008-03-11 15:48 | Diff · History | 1,422 | →On what can be loosened (if any) in the subguidelines: reply to Masem |
| 2008-02-13 00:23 | Diff · History | 611 | →Notability is really a policy: reply to SmokeyJoe |
| 2008-02-10 09:21 | Diff · History | 469 | →Notability is really a policy: reply to SmokeyJoe |
| 2008-02-10 09:16 | Diff · History | 223 | →Secondary sources: reply to SmokeyJoe |
| 2008-02-03 00:24 | Diff · History | 302 | →Secondary sources: reply to SmokeyJoe |
| 2008-02-02 22:44 | Diff · History | 389 | →Secondary sources: reply to Masem |
| 2008-02-02 22:40 | Diff · History | 348 | →This guideline violates the no original research policy: reply to Kubigula |
| 2008-02-02 04:19 | Diff · History | 1,756 | new section: This guideline violates the no original research policy |
All times are in UTC.