Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Circumcision and law (Log · Page History) |
| User | POV Detective (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 14 |
| Minor edits | 1 (7.1%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 3 (21.4%) |
| Reverted edits | 7 (50%) |
| atbe1 | 0.9 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 232 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -26 |
Minor edits
·
1 (7.1%)
Major edits
·
13 (92.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
3 (21.4%)
Manual edits
·
11 (78.6%)
Reverted edits
·
7 (50%)
Unreverted edits
·
7 (50%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-08-25 15:35 | Diff · History | 40 | (reverted) no link to primary source for some claims in this article |
| 2010-08-25 14:02 | Diff · History | -949 | (reverted) →History: such historical claims require a PRIMARY SOURCE |
| 2010-08-20 13:15 | Diff · History | -1,014 | (reverted) Undid revision 379905092 by Avraham (talk) this claim belongs in the Wiki article on the Maccabean rebellion--you cite a lawyer, not a historian |
| 2010-08-20 03:21 | Diff · History | -1,014 | (reverted) →History: historical claim lacks primary source ... Maccabees article doesn't make such an unsupported claim for good reason...conjecture, not fact |
| 2010-08-18 22:45 | Diff · History | 64 | (reverted) Miller does not cite his source -- so he's apparently relying on the Bible's two sentences for his claim, not the way history is documented as fact |
| 2010-08-17 16:39 | Diff · History | -232 | (reverted) Undid revision 379253441 by Avraham (talk) the two "sources" do not confirm the assertion |
| 2010-08-16 16:28 | Diff · History | 1 | →History: add period mark at end of sentence |
| 2010-08-16 16:27 | Diff · History | 9 | →History: 1 Maccabees 1:60-61 does not support the claim about the Maccabean Revolt |
| 2010-08-15 16:09 | Diff · History | 92 | Undid revision 379057796 by Jayjg (talk) those making this historical claim must cite the Bible wording that supports it |
| 2010-08-15 15:18 | Diff · History | 92 | (reverted) →History: Holy Bible citation I Maccabees does not support the broad historical claim |
| 2010-08-13 18:40 | Diff · History | 71 | →History: dubious statement, added "According to the Bible" for accuracy |
| 2010-08-13 16:00 | Diff · History | -26 | →History: source needed for broad statements of purported historical fact |
| 2010-08-13 15:45 | Diff · History | 51 | →History: broad statement qualified because citation does not support it |
| 2010-08-12 19:15 | Diff · History | 8 | →History: qualifying the "claim" about Antiochus prohibition |
All times are in UTC.