Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Wikipedia talk:Verifiability (Log · Page History) |
| User | Nuujinn (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 282 |
| Minor edits | 3 (1.1%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (0.4%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 1.4 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 189,819 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -57 |
Minor edits
·
3 (1.1%)
Major edits
·
279 (98.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (0.4%)
Manual edits
·
281 (99.6%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
282 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12-17 14:57 | Diff · History | 377 | →Informal RfC on Discussion tag: support |
| 2011-12-16 23:59 | Diff · History | 470 | →Returning to Crazynas's original proposal: concur with Typtofish |
| 2011-12-08 01:35 | Diff · History | 322 | →It doesn't take this long to determine consensus: please do |
| 2011-11-26 22:40 | Diff · History | 227 | →While we're waiting ...: yum |
| 2011-11-26 14:14 | Diff · History | 162 | →While we're waiting ...: well said |
| 2011-11-26 10:58 | Diff · History | 190 | →While we're waiting ...: too bad |
| 2011-11-24 21:35 | Diff · History | 658 | →Procedural discussion: of course, but.... |
| 2011-11-24 20:53 | Diff · History | 268 | →Procedural discussion: good idea |
| 2011-11-22 00:39 | Diff · History | 552 | →RfC decision?: concur |
| 2011-11-14 12:35 | Diff · History | 636 | →Updated Wikipedia:Editing scientific articles, it now makes clear why "Not Truth" is not desirable: r |
| 2011-11-09 11:31 | Diff · History | 274 | →And a published source is.....: disagree |
| 2011-11-06 01:06 | Diff · History | 511 | →Oppose: I'm not sure. |
| 2011-11-06 00:01 | Diff · History | 272 | →Oppose: no less valid |
| 2011-11-03 10:07 | Diff · History | 2,112 | →Jimbo's argument: comments, it's not that there's no truth, but that truths vary |
| 2011-11-02 00:09 | Diff · History | 1,030 | →Two thirds is not consensus: comment |
| 2011-10-31 19:18 | Diff · History | 665 | →Implications to WP:FRINGE: r |
| 2011-10-31 18:30 | Diff · History | 822 | →Implications to WP:FRINGE: yes, and comment |
| 2011-10-31 17:07 | Diff · History | 1,040 | →Implications to WP:FRINGE: more than one would think |
| 2011-10-31 15:32 | Diff · History | 1,302 | →Should we extend the RfC?: comment, r to S Marshall |
| 2011-10-31 10:37 | Diff · History | 1,023 | |
| 2011-10-30 23:30 | Diff · History | 1,384 | →An attempt at another starting point: not that much difference really |
| 2011-10-30 16:30 | Diff · History | 3,179 | →An attempt at another starting point: reply |
| 2011-10-30 14:58 | Diff · History | 1,623 | →An attempt at another starting point: clarification, I hope |
| 2011-10-30 14:33 | Diff · History | 318 | →Time to close?: c |
| 2011-10-30 13:16 | Diff · History | 1,363 | →An attempt at another starting point: reply, North8000 has done good work here, frustration is understandable |
| 2011-10-29 23:31 | Diff · History | 567 | →changing the name of the RfC: comments |
| 2011-10-29 22:35 | Diff · History | 438 | →changing the name of the RfC: r |
| 2011-10-29 19:30 | Diff · History | 1,382 | →Temporarily close the RFC, give people the time to read and discuss and then re-open the RFC: appearances |
| 2011-10-29 15:43 | Diff · History | 1,821 | →Temporarily close the RFC, give people the time to read and discuss and then re-open the RFC: comments and repeat |
| 2011-10-29 12:32 | Diff · History | 2,831 | →Temporarily close the RFC, give people the time to read and discuss and then re-open the RFC: extend discussions 2 weeks, some general comments |
| 2011-10-29 12:03 | Diff · History | 267 | →Time to close?: not helpful |
| 2011-10-29 03:00 | Diff · History | 192 | →Time to close?: uh? |
| 2011-10-29 01:43 | Diff · History | 372 | →Temporarily close the RFC, give people the time to read and discuss and then re-open the RFC: sit tight? |
| 2011-10-29 00:21 | Diff · History | 1,091 | →Time to close?: comments |
| 2011-10-28 15:31 | Diff · History | 539 | →Time to close?: concur, unanimity is likely impossible |
| 2011-10-27 00:02 | Diff · History | 278 | →Page number specification: well said |
| 2011-10-18 13:42 | Diff · History | 398 | →A more pressing example: not rs |
| 2011-10-10 00:30 | Diff · History | 715 | →Concrete example: does the date matter? |
| 2011-10-09 22:03 | Diff · History | 470 | →Concrete example: r |
| 2011-10-08 20:12 | Diff · History | 4,103 | →This policy and the core policies: not a good example |
| 2011-10-06 00:03 | Diff · History | 257 | →Comments: support |
| 2011-10-04 11:18 | Diff · History | 1,509 | →Random break 1: r to Kotniski |
| 2011-10-03 23:46 | Diff · History | 669 | →Random break 1: reply |
| 2011-10-03 22:41 | Diff · History | 2,653 | →Random break 1: comments |
| 2011-10-01 12:22 | Diff · History | 704 | co |
| 2011-09-30 20:30 | Diff · History | 783 | →Has Verifiability become the new Truth?: thanks and comment |
| 2011-09-30 12:25 | Diff · History | 1,452 | →Has Verifiability become the new Truth?: comments |
| 2011-09-20 00:29 | Diff · History | 871 | →Contradictory sources: not good examples |
| 2011-09-19 12:17 | Diff · History | 2,127 | →Contradictory sources: comments |
| 2011-09-18 22:51 | Diff · History | 953 | →Contradictory sources: r |
| 2011-09-18 14:11 | Diff · History | 1,428 | →Contradictory sources: reply |
| 2011-09-18 12:53 | Diff · History | 887 | →Contradictory sources: what's the problem? |
| 2011-09-11 22:39 | Diff · History | 196 | →Did I miss something?: thanks! |
| 2011-09-11 20:05 | Diff · History | 304 | →Did I miss something?: not very precise |
| 2011-09-03 13:07 | Diff · History | 116 | →sub-page consensus diff: sign |
| 2011-09-03 13:01 | Diff · History | 112 | →sub-page consensus diff: concur |
| 2011-09-01 19:44 | Diff · History | 980 | →Continued general discussion: comment |
| 2011-09-01 16:39 | Diff · History | 1,856 | →Continued general discussion: yeap, I meant what I said |
| 2011-09-01 11:49 | Diff · History | 1,191 | →request to postpone discussion for eight weeks: x is more important than y |
| 2011-08-31 13:05 | Diff · History | 918 | →request to postpone discussion for eight weeks: the horse is dead, Jim |
| 2011-08-31 10:21 | Diff · History | 1,759 | →RfC: Tendentious editing of policy Wikipedia:Verifiability: ye gods |
| 2011-08-28 23:02 | Diff · History | 516 | →So how's this as a first sentence?: comment |
| 2011-08-28 20:28 | Diff · History | 230 | →So how's this as a first sentence?: not interested |
| 2011-08-28 20:08 | Diff · History | 230 | →So how's this as a first sentence?: snark with that whine? |
| 2011-08-27 20:24 | Diff · History | 203 | →Verifiability as currently defined would eliminate large chunks of wikipedia: gave it a shot |
| 2011-08-27 14:04 | Diff · History | 1,200 | →Verifiability as currently defined would eliminate large chunks of wikipedia: good as a suggestion, but not a rule |
| 2011-08-27 01:23 | Diff · History | 246 | →Verifiability as currently defined would eliminate large chunks of wikipedia: loop de loop |
| 2011-08-27 00:19 | Diff · History | 253 | →Verifiability as currently defined would eliminate large chunks of wikipedia: yes |
| 2011-08-26 23:29 | Diff · History | 377 | →Verifiability as currently defined would eliminate large chunks of wikipedia: yeap |
| 2011-08-26 08:47 | Diff · History | 199 | →Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth, an essay: link it |
| 2011-08-25 10:47 | Diff · History | 681 | →Interjection by another editor: GNG? |
| 2011-08-23 00:26 | Diff · History | 609 | →Long-term sourcing/removal policy: comment |
| 2011-08-23 00:03 | Diff · History | 371 | →Long-term sourcing/removal policy: question |
| 2011-08-22 11:23 | Diff · History | 227 | →Proposal for moving forward productively: off topic |
| 2011-08-21 00:06 | Diff · History | 261 | →Proposal for moving forward productively: so what do you suggest? |
| 2011-08-20 22:13 | Diff · History | 348 | →Proposal for moving forward productively: yes |
| 2011-08-20 18:05 | Diff · History | 642 | →A proposed rewording of WP:NONENG #4: comment |
| 2011-08-20 17:47 | Diff · History | 300 | →Proposal for moving forward productively: good idea, amended |
| 2011-08-20 17:10 | Diff · History | 847 | →Proposal for moving forward productively : new section |
| 2011-08-20 15:54 | Diff · History | 956 | →Discussion about the new sub-page: let's make some proposals and compare them. |
| 2011-08-20 00:32 | Diff · History | 975 | →Discussion about the new sub-page: c |
| 2011-08-19 22:03 | Diff · History | 478 | →Let's end the "Verifiability, not truth" topic: rfc |
| 2011-08-19 17:53 | Diff · History | 598 | →Let's end the "Verifiability, not truth" topic: work on a proposal to bring here seems fine |
| 2011-08-18 10:02 | Diff · History | 1,328 | →Removing not truth: rant |
| 2011-08-17 10:23 | Diff · History | 241 | →Removing not truth: o |
| 2011-08-13 17:20 | Diff · History | 1,491 | →Policy question with regards to hurricane: comments and questions |
| 2011-08-13 15:58 | Diff · History | 714 | →Policy question with regards to hurricane: sorry, me stupid |
| 2011-08-13 15:11 | Diff · History | 315 | →Notability section, tweaking: concurrence |
| 2011-08-12 22:17 | Diff · History | 442 | →Policy question with regards to hurricane: seems OR |
| 2011-08-11 22:07 | Diff · History | 508 | →yet another arbitrary break: comment |
| 2011-08-11 13:51 | Diff · History | 874 | →Comments on the proposals: semantic layer |
| 2011-08-11 10:57 | Diff · History | 222 | making room |
| 2011-08-11 10:55 | Diff · History | 1,680 | r |
| 2011-08-11 10:20 | Diff · History | 230 | I see no problem |
| 2011-08-11 10:13 | Diff · History | 265 | →Comments on the proposals: really? |
| 2011-08-09 23:57 | Diff · History | 369 | →TV: depends |
| 2011-08-09 09:55 | Diff · History | 350 | →Comments on the proposals: |
| 2011-08-08 00:38 | Diff · History | 215 | →Comments on the proposals: fine by me |
| 2011-08-07 17:59 | Diff · History | 228 | →Comments on the proposals: r to north8000 |
| 2011-08-07 17:40 | Diff · History | 235 | →Comments on the proposals: alternate proposal |
| 2011-08-07 17:38 | Diff · History | 670 | →A genuine compromise to resolve this, or at least calm it for a while? Part B: Alternate X |
| 2011-08-07 15:46 | Diff · History | 424 | →Comments on the proposals: q for SV |
| 2011-08-07 14:36 | Diff · History | 827 | →Machine translation: comment |
| 2011-08-06 21:22 | Diff · History | 544 | →Comments on the proposals: ws |
| 2011-08-06 01:13 | Diff · History | 731 | →Arbitrary break: no, because many people aren't involved here. |
| 2011-08-05 15:29 | Diff · History | 471 | →Arbitrary break: TLDR? ha, you know nothing... ;) |
| 2011-08-05 10:38 | Diff · History | 671 | →Arbitrary break: question |
| 2011-08-04 22:24 | Diff · History | 212 | →Then is a first change just to point to relevant policies?: concur |
| 2011-08-02 01:02 | Diff · History | 1,821 | →Arbitrary break: r |
| 2011-08-01 01:29 | Diff · History | 949 | →Arbitrary break: replies |
| 2011-08-01 00:22 | Diff · History | 952 | →Arbitrary break: comments |
| 2011-07-31 21:17 | Diff · History | 1,140 | →Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth: comments |
| 2011-07-30 22:57 | Diff · History | 1,324 | →Verifiable material may or may not be accurate, agree?: replies |
| 2011-07-30 20:37 | Diff · History | 532 | →Verifiable material may or may not be accurate, agree?: not being sarcastic, what's your point? |
| 2011-07-30 18:56 | Diff · History | 563 | →Verifiable material may or may not be accurate, agree?: reply |
| 2011-07-30 17:02 | Diff · History | 444 | →Template:Fact (ab)uses: comment |
| 2011-07-30 16:45 | Diff · History | 481 | →And we can try for consensus again!: r to North8000 |
| 2011-07-30 14:21 | Diff · History | 509 | →And we can try for consensus again!: good plan |
| 2011-07-29 11:08 | Diff · History | 1,001 | →Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth: r |
| 2011-07-29 01:40 | Diff · History | 360 | →And we can try for consensus again!: too vague |
| 2011-07-29 00:04 | Diff · History | 314 | →And we can try for consensus again!: c |
| 2011-07-29 00:01 | Diff · History | 162 | →We came close to consensus: c |
| 2011-07-28 11:36 | Diff · History | 1,357 | →We came close to consensus: i don't think so |
| 2011-07-25 09:44 | Diff · History | 551 | →Proposal: r |
| 2011-07-25 01:12 | Diff · History | 413 | better, or worse? |
| 2011-07-20 17:46 | Diff · History | 405 | →Proposal: consensus would be nice |
| 2011-07-20 15:33 | Diff · History | 439 | →Proposal: shocked and good choice. |
| 2011-07-20 00:35 | Diff · History | 627 | →Proposal: comment |
| 2011-07-19 22:21 | Diff · History | 550 | →Proposal: support |
| 2011-07-18 01:14 | Diff · History | 542 | →additional discussion: concur |
| 2011-07-17 23:58 | Diff · History | 551 | →A suggestion: how about |
| 2011-07-17 20:20 | Diff · History | 265 | →A suggestion: questions |
| 2011-07-17 20:18 | Diff · History | 278 | →A suggestion: good ideas |
| 2011-07-17 17:59 | Diff · History | 540 | →additional discussion: disagree |
| 2011-07-17 13:33 | Diff · History | 531 | →additional discussion: No, please God, no |
| 2011-07-16 15:42 | Diff · History | 418 | →back to basics: sorry |
| 2011-07-16 06:33 | Diff · History | 382 | →back to basics: how many more months? |
| 2011-07-16 04:23 | Diff · History | 221 | →back to basics: ? |
| 2011-07-16 02:03 | Diff · History | 683 | →back to basics: r |
| 2011-07-16 01:10 | Diff · History | 271 | →back to basics: horse is dead |
| 2011-07-14 12:56 | Diff · History | 27 | →Suggestion for any other changes: sounds fine |
| 2011-07-14 10:40 | Diff · History | 753 | →Let's verify that "verifiable" is intimately related to "truth": change gears |
| 2011-07-14 02:39 | Diff · History | 654 | →Let's verify that "verifiable" is intimately related to "truth": c |
| 2011-07-14 00:45 | Diff · History | 7 | →Let's verify that "verifiable" is intimately related to "truth": doh |
| 2011-07-14 00:44 | Diff · History | 1,733 | →Let's verify that "verifiable" is intimately related to "truth": r to S Marshall |
| 2011-07-13 19:28 | Diff · History | 258 | →Let's verify that "verifiable" is intimately related to "truth": r |
| 2011-07-13 19:25 | Diff · History | 539 | →Conflicting 'truths': pov warriors don't stop, so we shut them down. |
| 2011-07-13 11:31 | Diff · History | -1 | →Is this a Brainwave? "Not only true, but verifiably true": sp |
| 2011-07-13 11:31 | Diff · History | 596 | →Is this a Brainwave? "Not only true, but verifiably true": truth is sticky |
| 2011-07-13 11:22 | Diff · History | 386 | →Is this a Brainwave? "Not only true, but verifiably true": North8000's suggestion |
| 2011-07-13 11:13 | Diff · History | 405 | →Is this a Brainwave? "Not only true, but verifiably true": well said |
| 2011-07-12 13:50 | Diff · History | 362 | →"Not truth" discussion: exactly my point |
| 2011-07-12 11:25 | Diff · History | 3,289 | →"Not truth" discussion: long winded pedantic reply, sorry... |
| 2011-07-12 00:14 | Diff · History | 637 | →"Not truth" discussion: r |
| 2011-07-11 21:25 | Diff · History | 436 | →"Not truth" discussion: c |
| 2011-07-09 01:27 | Diff · History | 199 | →Secondary sources: we do, just not here |
| 2011-06-20 13:54 | Diff · History | 274 | →Non-English sources for new material: cmt |
| 2011-06-19 14:25 | Diff · History | 1,968 | →Non-English sources for new material: my bad |
| 2011-06-18 19:09 | Diff · History | 536 | →"not truth" is a Figure of speech: round the bend again |
| 2011-06-15 15:59 | Diff · History | 358 | →Examples?: concur |
| 2011-06-14 19:33 | Diff · History | 247 | →Neutral: comment |
| 2011-06-13 23:41 | Diff · History | 201 | →Neutral: question |
| 2011-06-13 14:44 | Diff · History | 182 | →Threaded discussion: good faith |
| 2011-06-13 10:36 | Diff · History | 1,326 | →Non-English sources for new material: r and out |
| 2011-06-13 10:22 | Diff · History | 315 | →Oppose: |
| 2011-06-12 22:03 | Diff · History | 361 | →Additional comments and discussions: c |
| 2011-06-12 19:40 | Diff · History | 167 | →Additional comments and discussions: seems reasonable |
| 2011-06-11 20:41 | Diff · History | 436 | →Additional comments and discussions: r |
| 2011-06-11 15:37 | Diff · History | -40 | →Non-English sources for new material: removing duplication |
| 2011-06-11 15:36 | Diff · History | 987 | →Non-English sources for new material: r |
| 2011-06-11 14:35 | Diff · History | 880 | →Non-English sources for new material: off to the bigger picture |
| 2011-06-10 22:36 | Diff · History | 246 | →Oppose: o |
| 2011-06-05 19:56 | Diff · History | 782 | →Non-English sources for new material: r |
| 2011-06-05 16:13 | Diff · History | 731 | →Non-English sources for new material: r |
| 2011-06-05 12:27 | Diff · History | 1,192 | →Non-English sources for new material: new section |
| 2011-06-04 02:19 | Diff · History | 1,503 | →Non-English sources policy: r to S Marshall |
| 2011-06-03 23:17 | Diff · History | 928 | →Non-English sources policy: r |
| 2011-06-03 10:57 | Diff · History | 1,228 | →Non-English sources policy: other direction' |
| 2011-06-02 20:38 | Diff · History | 253 | →So, what should we now say about the relation between cell phone use and brain cancer?: boing boing has some material on this |
| 2011-06-01 00:37 | Diff · History | 342 | →So, what should we now say about the relation between cell phone use and brain cancer?: |
| 2011-05-31 20:55 | Diff · History | 680 | →Wikipedia as source: no, that's not it |
| 2011-05-30 11:21 | Diff · History | -6 | →Re-writing BURDEN: recasting |
| 2011-05-30 11:18 | Diff · History | 1,910 | →Re-writing BURDEN: not a good example |
| 2011-05-30 01:20 | Diff · History | 1,245 | →Re-writing BURDEN: yes, and the sky is not necessarily blue |
| 2011-05-28 12:51 | Diff · History | 958 | →Re-writing BURDEN: r |
| 2011-05-26 00:42 | Diff · History | 309 | →Re-writing BURDEN: yes |
| 2011-05-18 20:02 | Diff · History | 303 | →Intent: concur |
| 2011-05-18 19:39 | Diff · History | 1,705 | →Debate over "Truth" - Principals or Language?: comments |
| 2011-05-02 21:17 | Diff · History | 332 | →Edit that originally put "threshold" into first sentence: contention is contention |
| 2011-04-18 16:07 | Diff · History | 182 | →Oppose: nothing's broken |
| 2011-04-09 00:32 | Diff · History | 332 | →Wording of SPS: concur, where's the beef? |
| 2011-04-08 11:33 | Diff · History | 521 | →Wording of SPS: splitting hairs |
| 2011-04-05 11:48 | Diff · History | 1,421 | →Wording of SPS: no objection, but it won't help |
| 2011-03-05 02:21 | Diff · History | 499 | →Use of article as a whiteboard: disagree |
| 2011-03-05 01:02 | Diff · History | 609 | →Use of article as a whiteboard: reply |
| 2011-03-02 22:05 | Diff · History | 280 | →Use of article as a whiteboard: yes |
| 2011-01-31 11:42 | Diff · History | 254 | →Further discussion on proposed wording change in lead: heh |
| 2011-01-31 01:51 | Diff · History | 316 | →Further discussion on proposed wording change in lead: comment |
| 2011-01-31 00:23 | Diff · History | 615 | →Further discussion on proposed wording change in lead: alt version. |
| 2011-01-28 01:04 | Diff · History | 256 | →discussion following the revert (threshold again): comment and link |
| 2011-01-28 00:18 | Diff · History | 366 | →Further discussion on proposed wording change in lead: comment |
| 2011-01-28 00:15 | Diff · History | 283 | →Are challenged statements really supposed to be verified?: yes, and agf |
| 2011-01-23 17:26 | Diff · History | 221 | →Verification of lists: yes |
| 2011-01-23 14:27 | Diff · History | 658 | →Verification of lists: unsourced assertions |
| 2011-01-16 23:30 | Diff · History | 624 | →Time limits for BLPs without V or RS: reply |
| 2011-01-16 22:53 | Diff · History | 583 | →Time limits for BLPs without V or RS: BLP Prod, drive |
| 2011-01-16 18:55 | Diff · History | 248 | →Copyright in the lead: concur |
| 2011-01-16 08:04 | Diff · History | 210 | →Copyright in the lead: agree |
| 2011-01-15 14:15 | Diff · History | 283 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: suggestion |
| 2011-01-13 23:52 | Diff · History | 591 | →Misuse of a reference: r |
| 2011-01-13 19:49 | Diff · History | 371 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: concur with N2e |
| 2011-01-13 16:30 | Diff · History | 324 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: reply to alinor |
| 2011-01-12 17:21 | Diff · History | 374 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: cn is not a club |
| 2011-01-12 13:32 | Diff · History | 1,033 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: r |
| 2011-01-11 14:09 | Diff · History | 495 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: reply |
| 2011-01-11 13:07 | Diff · History | 970 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: still do not see a problem really |
| 2011-01-11 10:10 | Diff · History | 342 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: q |
| 2011-01-10 23:55 | Diff · History | 302 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: r |
| 2011-01-10 21:57 | Diff · History | 235 | →Sourcing for summarizing articles: navigational aids |
| 2011-01-10 17:34 | Diff · History | 576 | →Wikipedia reliability: r |
| 2011-01-10 13:43 | Diff · History | 328 | →"requirement" vs. "absolute requirement": r |
| 2011-01-09 18:06 | Diff · History | 545 | →"requirement" vs. "absolute requirement": alt |
| 2010-12-28 16:37 | Diff · History | 388 | →Ancient self-published sources: age not relelvant |
| 2010-12-24 00:50 | Diff · History | 591 | →Close paraphrasing: Does not, in my opinion, illustrate any particular problem with the wording of WP:V |
| 2010-12-23 12:35 | Diff · History | 464 | →Close paraphrasing: examples? |
| 2010-12-19 16:07 | Diff · History | 324 | →Copyright: just a point if anything |
| 2010-12-19 14:02 | Diff · History | 206 | →"Threshold" again: please clarify |
| 2010-12-18 01:17 | Diff · History | 277 | →Ease of access: q |
| 2010-12-17 00:35 | Diff · History | 314 | →Ease of access: could you elaborate? |
| 2010-12-17 00:08 | Diff · History | 1 | →Ease of access: fixing indent |
| 2010-12-17 00:08 | Diff · History | 596 | →Ease of access: reply, it's the source to which we need access |
| 2010-12-16 22:55 | Diff · History | 280 | →Ease of access: access to source |
| 2010-12-12 13:14 | Diff · History | 774 | →Some practical concerns: reply |
| 2010-12-05 22:26 | Diff · History | 205 | →No specific objection to MEDRS guideline: concur |
| 2010-12-01 12:33 | Diff · History | 410 | →How to discuss "truth": r |
| 2010-12-01 00:40 | Diff · History | 511 | →How to discuss "truth": reply |
| 2010-11-29 12:44 | Diff · History | 706 | →How to discuss "truth": RS not V |
| 2010-11-29 01:02 | Diff · History | 1,911 | →How to discuss "truth": not workable |
| 2010-11-27 21:43 | Diff · History | 500 | →A new example: r |
| 2010-11-27 21:16 | Diff · History | 406 | →A new example: concur |
| 2010-11-27 14:28 | Diff · History | 315 | →preliminary discussion about the motion: not needed |
| 2010-11-27 11:04 | Diff · History | 615 | →Motion is made that WP:V is ambiguous: no contradiction |
| 2010-11-25 18:42 | Diff · History | 972 | →Can something "not true" be verifiable?: yes, it can |
| 2010-11-25 16:04 | Diff · History | 262 | →Are we done here?: certainly |
| 2010-11-25 16:02 | Diff · History | 182 | →No specific objection: concur |
| 2010-11-25 13:29 | Diff · History | 412 | →Trying to keep on subject here: new section, are we done? |
| 2010-11-24 15:05 | Diff · History | 624 | →Trying to keep on subject here: better, or worse? |
| 2010-11-24 14:58 | Diff · History | 660 | →What does 'challenge' mean?: yes |
| 2010-11-24 14:13 | Diff · History | 631 | →Trying to keep on subject here: opportunity knocks |
| 2010-11-23 14:21 | Diff · History | 1,496 | →Trying to keep on subject here: perhaps an rfc |
| 2010-11-23 11:57 | Diff · History | 1,066 | →Trying to keep on subject here: comments |
| 2010-11-22 17:21 | Diff · History | 533 | →Random Break #4: all the same, day to day stuff around here |
| 2010-11-22 16:52 | Diff · History | 1,163 | →Random Break #4: I just don't get it |
| 2010-11-22 12:15 | Diff · History | 655 | →Random Break #4: reply |
| 2010-11-22 01:06 | Diff · History | 961 | →Random Break #4: examples, please |
| 2010-11-21 23:32 | Diff · History | 433 | →Random Break #4: questions |
| 2010-11-21 22:56 | Diff · History | 1,338 | →Random Break #4: comments |
| 2010-11-21 21:55 | Diff · History | 2 | →Are we in the wrong place?: |
| 2010-11-21 21:54 | Diff · History | 767 | →Are we in the wrong place?: comment |
| 2010-11-21 19:45 | Diff · History | 161 | →Are we in the wrong place?: oops, didn't sign |
| 2010-11-21 18:50 | Diff · History | 507 | →Are we in the wrong place?: comments |
| 2010-11-21 13:27 | Diff · History | 833 | →Are we in the wrong place?: r |
| 2010-11-21 12:44 | Diff · History | 593 | →Are we in the wrong place?: disagree |
| 2010-11-21 02:21 | Diff · History | 263 | →Are we in the wrong place?: relevance? |
| 2010-11-20 19:08 | Diff · History | 542 | →Random Break #3: new section |
| 2010-11-20 15:59 | Diff · History | -10 | →Random Break #3: |
| 2010-11-20 15:57 | Diff · History | 1,488 | another crack, questions |
| 2010-11-20 13:31 | Diff · History | 405 | →Random Break #3: sounds fine to me |
| 2010-11-20 00:37 | Diff · History | 1,212 | →If something is well known, is it automatically easy to source?: not broke |
| 2010-11-18 23:30 | Diff · History | 1,205 | →If something is well known, is it automatically easy to source?: easier just to source. |
| 2010-11-18 21:54 | Diff · History | 381 | →If something is well known, is it automatically easy to source?: how does it reduce misuse of tags? |
| 2010-11-18 19:15 | Diff · History | 274 | →If something is well known, is it automatically easy to source?: ha |
| 2010-11-18 19:02 | Diff · History | 406 | →If something is well known, is it automatically easy to source?: afoul of V |
| 2010-11-16 14:56 | Diff · History | 352 | →Random Break #1: r |
| 2010-11-16 13:55 | Diff · History | 1,410 | →When a reliable source is required: r |
| 2010-11-16 12:50 | Diff · History | 1,479 | →When a reliable source is required: r |
| 2010-11-16 11:46 | Diff · History | 1,442 | →When a reliable source is required: r |
| 2010-11-16 01:08 | Diff · History | 338 | Reverted 1 edit by LevenBoy (talk); Rolled back deletion of another user's comment. (TW) |
| 2010-11-14 18:55 | Diff · History | 1,329 | →When a reliable source is required: we'd turn to sources anyway |
| 2010-11-14 15:11 | Diff · History | 1,271 | →When a reliable source is required: reply, material should be sourced |
| 2010-11-13 17:36 | Diff · History | 632 | →When a reliable source is required: c |
| 2010-11-13 14:05 | Diff · History | 383 | →When a reliable source is required: comment |
All times are in UTC.