Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Nuujinn • Talk:Conspiracy theory • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Talk:Conspiracy theory (Log · Page History)
User Nuujinn (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 71
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 1
Added (bytes)2 53,569
Deleted (bytes) -4,120
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 71 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 71 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 71 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2011-11-06 22:24 Diff · History 853 →The lead: r
2011-11-06 22:15 Diff · History 325 →"No consensus": concur with Jayjg
2011-11-05 11:03 Diff · History 399 →Defintions of conspericy theory: minority view
2011-11-04 11:08 Diff · History 984 →Defintions of conspericy theory: let's get on with it, and stop repeating the same material over and over and over
2011-11-02 23:36 Diff · History 368 →Recent edits (October, 2011): no, I don't think so.
2011-10-29 11:59 Diff · History 668 →Recent edits (October, 2011): comment and question
2011-10-29 00:50 Diff · History 3,345 →Recent edits (October, 2011): long winded reply
2011-10-28 23:55 Diff · History 2,707 →Recent edits (October, 2011): r
2011-10-28 10:52 Diff · History 262 →Recent edits (October, 2011): please stop
2011-10-28 10:40 Diff · History 533 →Recent edits (October, 2011): r
2011-10-26 12:31 Diff · History 321 →Recent edits (October, 2011): history
2011-10-26 09:56 Diff · History 289 →Recent edits (October, 2011): please
2011-10-02 20:28 Diff · History 968 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: strawman
2011-10-02 12:24 Diff · History 157 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: well said
2011-10-02 12:09 Diff · History 838 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: r
2011-10-01 14:11 Diff · History -4,120 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: Pulling most of it, not really appropriate here on further consideration
2011-10-01 13:34 Diff · History 7 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: fixing formatting in long winded reply which is probably a mistake
2011-10-01 13:32 Diff · History 5,217 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: long winded reply that is probably a mistake
2011-10-01 01:04 Diff · History 1,460 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: done
2011-09-28 23:15 Diff · History 491 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: wrong venue
2011-09-28 22:23 Diff · History 955 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: question
2011-09-19 21:28 Diff · History 372 →Fiction section: new section
2011-09-15 11:37 Diff · History 394 →New usage section: let's leave it for now
2011-09-10 17:46 Diff · History 431 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: discussion at V, deleting the date
2011-09-08 23:15 Diff · History 450 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: recast
2011-09-08 10:28 Diff · History 641 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: let's try again
2011-09-08 09:34 Diff · History 1,066 →The first recorded use of the phrase "conspiracy theory" dates from 1909? WRONG!: comment
2011-09-07 11:06 Diff · History 1,823 →Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies: reply, conspiracies and conspiracy theories are not the same thing, use of dummies book crosses over into OR
2011-09-06 11:04 Diff · History 591 →Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies For Dummies: tertiary source, possible OR, no page number
2011-09-06 10:59 Diff · History 293 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: reverted expansion
2011-09-05 10:48 Diff · History 488 →New usage section: new section
2011-09-05 10:38 Diff · History 934 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: suggestion
2011-09-05 10:27 Diff · History 359 →More detailed lead: o
2011-09-05 10:23 Diff · History 227 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: r
2011-09-03 13:06 Diff · History 427 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: r and q
2011-09-02 19:21 Diff · History 241 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: could be worse
2011-09-02 14:07 Diff · History 330 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: s as nom
2011-09-02 08:50 Diff · History 2,865 →Bratich's explanation of Conspiracy theory: sorry to be long winded
2011-09-02 01:46 Diff · History 725 →Up or down !vote on Black Kite's suggestion: new section
2011-09-02 01:41 Diff · History 2,440 →Bratich's explanation of Conspiracy theory: r
2011-09-01 22:19 Diff · History 1,379 →Bratich's explanation of Conspiracy theory: r and suggestion
2011-09-01 12:16 Diff · History 1,489 →Bratich's explanation of Conspiracy theory: cherry picking quotes
2011-08-31 15:24 Diff · History 457 →Kate Zernike's article: r
2011-08-31 13:55 Diff · History 605 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: pov, Black Kite's version seems better
2011-08-31 10:27 Diff · History 412 →Kate Zernike's article: r
2011-08-30 10:57 Diff · History 373 →Fiction section: new section
2011-08-30 10:44 Diff · History 304 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: my take exactly
2011-08-29 13:35 Diff · History 294 →New lead - consensus and undos: suggest something else if you don't like it.
2011-08-29 12:14 Diff · History 587 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: r
2011-08-29 10:38 Diff · History 570 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: mos issues, tertiary sources, meaning of broad
2011-08-29 09:52 Diff · History 361 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: but what about the wording?
2011-08-28 23:58 Diff · History 269 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: yes, seems fair enough
2011-08-28 18:52 Diff · History 460 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: question
2011-08-28 16:24 Diff · History 372 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: yes, seems right
2011-08-28 15:49 Diff · History 1,408 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: some point, agreement on removing real conspiracies
2011-08-27 20:38 Diff · History 520 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: reply
2011-08-27 20:29 Diff · History 308 →Proposal for breaking the lede down: so you are opposed to my proposal?
2011-08-27 15:43 Diff · History 303 →Proposal for breaking the lede down: proposal
2011-08-27 15:41 Diff · History 175 →Bratich's explination of Conspiracy theory: quotes?
2011-08-27 14:07 Diff · History 398 →New lead - consensus and undos: consensus
2011-08-27 13:34 Diff · History 519 →Kate Zernike's article: let's find the best sources
2011-08-27 13:29 Diff · History 594 →Proposal for breaking the lede down: new section
2011-08-27 13:16 Diff · History 355 →New lead - consensus and undos: reverted
2011-08-26 20:51 Diff · History 776 →New lead - consensus and undos: concur, and clarification of Knight as a potential source
2011-08-26 20:34 Diff · History 245 →arbitrary break: question
2011-08-26 10:50 Diff · History 277 →“conspiracy theory” versus a “theory of conspiracy”?: rsn thread
2011-08-26 10:37 Diff · History 1,031 →“conspiracy theory” versus a “theory of conspiracy”?: comments
2011-08-26 09:13 Diff · History 1,066 →“conspiracy theory” versus a “theory of conspiracy”?: replies, please no synth
2011-08-26 08:56 Diff · History 362 →New lead - consensus and undos: nope
2011-08-26 00:50 Diff · History 257 →“conspiracy theory” versus a “theory of conspiracy”?: barkun is a 2ndary source
2011-08-25 11:13 Diff · History 799 →“conspiracy theory” versus a “theory of conspiracy”?: questions
All times are in UTC.