Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Conspiracy theory (Log · Page History) |
| User | Nuujinn (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 32 |
| Minor edits | 3 (9.4%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 9 (28.1%) |
| Reverted edits | 4 (12.5%) |
| atbe1 | 2 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 1,188 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -14,966 |
Minor edits
·
3 (9.4%)
Major edits
·
29 (90.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
9 (28.1%)
Manual edits
·
23 (71.9%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (12.5%)
Unreverted edits
·
28 (87.5%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-10-28 10:50 | Diff · History | -679 | Reverted good faith edits by Mystylplx (talk). (TW) |
| 2011-10-26 23:59 | Diff · History | -679 | (reverted) Reverted 2 edits by BruceGrubb (talk): Yes, contested as an appropriate lede. Please stop trying to force you personal version of the lede, discuss this instead of edit warring. ([[WP:T... |
| 2011-10-26 10:00 | Diff · History | -637 | (reverted) Reverted 2 edits by BruceGrubb (talk): Rolled back contested edits. (TW) |
| 2011-10-21 19:34 | Diff · History | -478 | Reverted 1 edit by 80.229.85.31 (talk): Have to have a good source for that one. (TW) |
| 2011-10-21 01:09 | Diff · History | 9 | Reverted 1 edit by 68.38.119.155 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Xenophrenic. (TW) |
| 2011-09-25 20:57 | Diff · History | 9 | →References: fixing reflist |
| 2011-09-25 20:52 | Diff · History | -448 | →Notes: removing, not appropriate, as these are not used as references in the article |
| 2011-09-20 23:38 | Diff · History | -25 | →See also: adjusted links |
| 2011-09-20 23:37 | Diff · History | -4,884 | →Fiction: removing section |
| 2011-09-19 23:50 | Diff · History | -910 | →Conspiracism: removed some unsourced assertions, page needed templates, cn templates, cleaned refs, removed Gibson and Mencken quote as they not experts |
| 2011-09-19 23:28 | Diff · History | -22 | →Study of conspiracism: remove section heading, there's nothing in this section about the study of conspiracism ''per see'' |
| 2011-09-18 22:32 | Diff · History | -9 | →Usage: cleanup |
| 2011-09-18 22:24 | Diff · History | 4 | →Usage: |
| 2011-09-18 22:18 | Diff · History | 237 | expansion, ref |
| 2011-09-18 22:08 | Diff · History | -87 | →Usage: fmttin |
| 2011-09-18 22:08 | Diff · History | 3 | →Usage: fmtting |
| 2011-09-18 22:07 | Diff · History | -103 | fixed refs, copy edits, move Knight's material, added some text attributable to the slate article, what it was used for is attributably to Knight, not Slate |
| 2011-09-18 18:32 | Diff · History | 591 | →Usage: moved Chomsky here |
| 2011-09-18 18:31 | Diff · History | -1,984 | →Criticism: 2nd try |
| 2011-09-10 17:50 | Diff · History | -302 | →Usage: deleted untrue statement, some recasting |
| 2011-09-08 23:13 | Diff · History | -62 | →Usage: recast first paragraph |
| 2011-09-08 09:36 | Diff · History | 29 | →Usage: distance |
| 2011-09-07 11:12 | Diff · History | -690 | →Proven conspiracies and conspiracy theories: removed dummies material, some ce |
| 2011-09-07 10:45 | Diff · History | -667 | Reverted good faith edits by 67.42.65.209 (talk): See talk page, we have rough consensus for the short lede while we work out wording issues. (TW) |
| 2011-09-06 10:56 | Diff · History | -2,754 | Reverted good faith edits by BruceGrubb (talk). (TW) |
| 2011-09-05 10:45 | Diff · History | 283 | putting in new lead per rough consensus, rearranging other material under a Usage section, so we can treat competing definitions and the history of the term |
| 2011-09-01 22:21 | Diff · History | -168 | Reverted good faith edits by 90.211.49.130 (talk): I don't think that's used as a reference in the article, so it doesn't belong in the reference section. (TW) |
| 2011-08-30 11:09 | Diff · History | -694 | →Terminology: removed some material which ventured into OR |
| 2011-08-30 10:54 | Diff · History | 8 | →Criticism: |
| 2011-08-30 10:54 | Diff · History | 15 | →Criticism: added ref improve template |
| 2011-08-27 13:13 | Diff · History | -1,287 | (reverted) Reverted good faith edits by BruceGrubb (talk): We do not have consensus for such sweeping changes. (TW) |
| 2011-08-26 09:05 | Diff · History | -1,494 | (reverted) Reverted good faith edits by Mystichumwipe (talk): Rolled back edit, we're discussion this, so please stop pushing your personal view. (TW) |
All times are in UTC.