Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:American Family Association (Log · Page History) |
| User | NatGertler (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 22 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (4.5%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (4.5%) |
| atbe1 | 123 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 10,976 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -45 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
22 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (4.5%)
Manual edits
·
21 (95.5%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (4.5%)
Unreverted edits
·
21 (95.5%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 21:45 | Diff · History | 627 | →Daily Mail source: new section |
| 2018-01-19 07:57 | Diff · History | 265 | →Critical lead sentence: again, unclosing discussion |
| 2018-01-19 07:51 | Diff · History | -45 | Undid revision 821211134 by MPWikiEdits (talk) Again removed an unneeded and insulting closure. |
| 2018-01-19 00:21 | Diff · History | -45 | (reverted) →Critical lead sentence: I have removed the insulting and unnecessary "closure" of the discussion. |
| 2018-01-18 23:06 | Diff · History | 287 | →Critical lead sentence: freedom |
| 2018-01-18 20:11 | Diff · History | 879 | →Critical lead sentence: that's not that deep a sentence. |
| 2018-01-18 18:49 | Diff · History | 664 | →Critical lead sentence: the AFA does indeed have some notoriety, and mere concern over notoriety should not be reason to exclude the sentence |
| 2016-12-03 17:37 | Diff · History | 169 | →Edit warring: RPP filed |
| 2016-12-03 14:21 | Diff · History | 1,172 | →Edit warring: new section |
| 2015-08-25 03:36 | Diff · History | 493 | →SPLC hate group listing: r |
| 2015-08-24 02:04 | Diff · History | 368 | →SPLC hate group listing: yes, redundancy is intentional and per our standards. |
| 2015-03-24 15:23 | Diff · History | 866 | →neutrality of this section is disputed: you seem to have gotten the wrong end of the stick |
| 2015-03-24 05:49 | Diff · History | 1,266 | →neutrality of this section is disputed: you are misdescribing the content of the article and insisting on including false assumptions |
| 2015-03-24 02:50 | Diff · History | 563 | →neutrality of this section is disputed: the SPLC's designation is a common part of coverage of the AFA |
| 2014-08-30 04:25 | Diff · History | 814 | →Classification as "fundamentalist" vs "traditional": |
| 2014-02-26 05:17 | Diff · History | 521 | →Abilene, Kansas situation: new section |
| 2013-02-16 17:07 | Diff · History | 204 | →Values vs beliefs in lede: striking part of my comment |
| 2013-02-15 03:53 | Diff · History | 376 | →Values vs beliefs in lede: Values is neutral; the problem lies elsewhere |
| 2012-08-16 22:16 | Diff · History | 213 | →RfC: include |
| 2012-06-03 14:07 | Diff · History | 418 | →Facebook page: one correction |
| 2012-06-03 07:17 | Diff · History | 263 | →Facebook page: not self-published material. |
| 2012-06-03 03:47 | Diff · History | 548 | →Facebook page: it;s not just The Advocate |
All times are in UTC.