Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:Arizona SB 1070 (Log · Page History) |
| User | JeffConrad (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 149 |
| Minor edits | 2 (1.3%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 2.6 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 110,121 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -250 |
Minor edits
·
2 (1.3%)
Major edits
·
147 (98.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
149 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
149 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-05-28 21:27 | Diff · History | 929 | →may 26 addition: I’d hold off, but if we do add something it should be brief, balanced, and accurate. |
| 2011-05-28 00:39 | Diff · History | 622 | →may 26 addition: It’s not an issue of ownership, but one of what’s apppriate, which the op-ed, in particular, is not. |
| 2011-05-26 23:29 | Diff · History | 108 | →may 26 addition: Agree with Seb. |
| 2011-04-24 06:07 | Diff · History | 1,054 | →Ninth Circuit ruling: Ruling was as favorable as it could have been, but is what the ruling upheld obvious to most readers? |
| 2011-04-24 03:33 | Diff · History | 489 | →Ninth Circuit ruling: new section |
| 2010-10-31 21:41 | Diff · History | 152 | →NPR investigative report...: Let's have more than one source. |
| 2010-10-22 19:04 | Diff · History | 662 | →Changes in fine from SB 1070 to HB 2162: R to Hunter Kahn. |
| 2010-10-22 03:56 | Diff · History | 586 | →Changes in fine from SB 1070 to HB 2162: new section |
| 2010-09-23 08:03 | Diff · History | 307 | →Support as well as controversy: new section |
| 2010-08-10 01:47 | Diff · History | 634 | →Discussion: No one suggested that all article titles use the bill number. |
| 2010-08-08 06:10 | Diff · History | 407 | →Southern Poverty Law Center: |
| 2010-08-08 06:05 | Diff · History | 394 | →Discussion: c Preclude conflict by appending the year? |
| 2010-08-08 02:14 | Diff · History | 3,353 | →Discussion: R to WhatamIdoing: comment on precision. |
| 2010-08-07 04:30 | Diff · History | 306 | →Discussion: |
| 2010-08-06 23:20 | Diff · History | 838 | →Discussion: WP took the same approach as here with California's Proposition 8 (both of them). |
| 2010-08-06 02:48 | Diff · History | 349 | →Southern Poverty Law Center: Previous wording wasn't right, but neither was comment in edit summary. |
| 2010-08-06 02:07 | Diff · History | 440 | →Southern Poverty Law Center: new section |
| 2010-08-04 18:52 | Diff · History | 2,385 | →Discussion: Despite shortcomings, the common name is probably the best choice. |
| 2010-08-04 09:20 | Diff · History | 1,980 | →Article naming: Page move should reflect consensus, not one editor's preference. |
| 2010-07-29 05:52 | Diff · History | 380 | →Provisions: sweep of the immigration check upon arrest: Comment on change to literal wordin on arrest. |
| 2010-07-29 03:14 | Diff · History | 17 | →Provisions: sweep of the immigration check upon arrest.: Clarify that emphasis was added here. |
| 2010-07-29 03:12 | Diff · History | 868 | →Provisions: sweep of the immigration check upon arrest.: new section |
| 2010-07-29 01:59 | Diff · History | 288 | →and if the bill is over-ruled?: Worry about it if and when it happens. |
| 2010-07-24 00:54 | Diff · History | 871 | →Another protest by me against the article title: Current wording of the lead seems the least awkward; let's see if it works. |
| 2010-07-23 23:47 | Diff · History | 301 | →Another protest by me against the article title: |
| 2010-07-23 22:27 | Diff · History | 1,108 | →Another protest by me against the article title: FIne with title, but keep it right internally. |
| 2010-07-23 08:48 | Diff · History | 456 | →Another protest by me against the article title: |
| 2010-07-23 04:20 | Diff · History | 1,494 | →Another protest by me against the article title: If we change the title, we need to ensure that references in the article are to the Act, which incorporates HB 2162. |
| 2010-07-23 01:19 | Diff · History | 15 | →Rhode Island: Added case info. |
| 2010-07-23 01:17 | Diff · History | 647 | →Rhode Island: This op-ed doesn't belong. |
| 2010-07-21 01:17 | Diff · History | 1,292 | →Provisions: new section |
| 2010-07-20 01:21 | Diff · History | 376 | →domestic abuse: Comment on moving exceptions to the transportation provision. |
| 2010-07-20 00:14 | Diff · History | 223 | →Joe Arpaio: |
| 2010-07-20 00:10 | Diff · History | 463 | →domestic abuse: |
| 2010-07-19 00:41 | Diff · History | 519 | →Joe Arpaio: new section |
| 2010-07-18 07:16 | Diff · History | 1,376 | →Citations in lead section.: new section |
| 2010-07-18 06:06 | Diff · History | 646 | →Arizona land of the Klan?: |
| 2010-07-18 03:53 | Diff · History | 3 | →Edits of 17 July 2010: Fixed spelling; added WL. |
| 2010-07-18 03:50 | Diff · History | 114 | →UTAH Letter: Agree it's off topic. |
| 2010-07-18 03:02 | Diff · History | 1,657 | →Lead, anyone?: Comment on primary vs. secondary source, lead section/tag policies. |
| 2010-07-18 01:43 | Diff · History | 2,437 | →Edits of 17 July 2010: |
| 2010-07-17 09:26 | Diff · History | 2,806 | →Crime rates in Arizona: New subsection: comment on edit. |
| 2010-07-17 02:18 | Diff · History | 941 | →Crime rates in Arizona: One more attempt ... |
| 2010-07-17 02:02 | Diff · History | 603 | →Lead, anyone?: |
| 2010-07-17 01:38 | Diff · History | 1,313 | →Lead, anyone?: Keep the original wording; IP editor should discuss here before any similar edits to this material. |
| 2010-07-16 04:40 | Diff · History | 611 | →Crime rates in Arizona: Read what I actually said. |
| 2010-07-16 02:22 | Diff · History | 0 | →Crime rates in Arizona: Sp. |
| 2010-07-16 02:15 | Diff · History | 115 | →Impact similar legislation: |
| 2010-07-16 02:14 | Diff · History | 564 | →Crime rates in Arizona: 'Rural' still does not imply 'border'. |
| 2010-07-16 00:47 | Diff · History | 362 | →Crime rates in Arizona: Need support for statement that border crime has increased. |
| 2010-07-15 21:28 | Diff · History | 1,140 | →Crime rates in Arizona: Comment on FBI crime stats and their implication. |
| 2010-07-15 03:48 | Diff · History | 268 | →Crime rates in Arizona: R to 65.185.178.220. |
| 2010-07-15 03:33 | Diff · History | 590 | →Split Article: R to 65.185.178.220. |
| 2010-07-15 02:42 | Diff · History | 647 | →Crime rates in Arizona: new section |
| 2010-07-13 23:30 | Diff · History | 883 | →Split Article: R to 65.185.178.220: state what's missing. |
| 2010-07-13 23:19 | Diff · History | 369 | →What is proof of citizenship?: Added link to AZPOST document. |
| 2010-07-13 07:31 | Diff · History | 1,703 | →Split Article: Don't split; add link to AZPOST training materials? |
| 2010-07-07 23:41 | Diff · History | 1,089 | →Who are citizens?: R to W8IMP. |
| 2010-07-07 23:26 | Diff · History | 715 | →What are we actually discussing?: R to W8IMP. |
| 2010-07-07 23:16 | Diff · History | -1 | Moved new sections to end. |
| 2010-06-22 03:57 | Diff · History | 364 | →Does SB1070 Prohibit or Allow Race as a factor?: Comment on edit by GrantCon15 |
| 2010-06-22 02:58 | Diff · History | 664 | →Does SB1070 Prohibit or Allow Race as a factor?: R to GrantCon15. |
| 2010-06-22 02:34 | Diff · History | 381 | →Does SB1070 Prohibit or Allow Race as a factor?: Reverted edit was partially correct. |
| 2010-06-02 01:08 | Diff · History | 486 | →Presumed not to be an alien: Change of reference format led to this. |
| 2010-05-30 23:05 | Diff · History | 558 | →Concurrent enforcement and the Supremacy Clause: Comment on edit and long note. |
| 2010-05-30 10:04 | Diff · History | 613 | →Concurrent enforcement and the Supremacy Clause: Comment on edit. |
| 2010-05-30 07:17 | Diff · History | 932 | →Concurrent enforcement and the Supremacy Clause: |
| 2010-05-30 04:35 | Diff · History | 1,340 | →Concurrent enforcement and the Supremacy Clause: new section |
| 2010-05-30 02:20 | Diff · History | 642 | →State of the article: R; fixed typo. |
| 2010-05-30 02:08 | Diff · History | 272 | →State of the article: |
| 2010-05-30 01:37 | Diff · History | 929 | →State of the article: |
| 2010-05-30 01:18 | Diff · History | 1,547 | →State of the article: |
| 2010-05-29 21:56 | Diff · History | 1,197 | →State of the article: Comment on copying from other sites, formatting, wording. |
| 2010-05-29 12:10 | Diff · History | 625 | →State of the article: Comment on revert. |
| 2010-05-29 09:28 | Diff · History | 483 | →Undue Weight: I don't see a problem. |
| 2010-05-29 09:21 | Diff · History | 341 | →Opposition: |
| 2010-05-29 09:15 | Diff · History | 1,149 | →State of the article: |
| 2010-05-24 01:22 | Diff · History | 1,276 | →Revert to previous name of the article: OK, but a few thoughts. |
| 2010-05-22 22:04 | Diff · History | 1,079 | →Revert to previous name of the article: Keep current title, but prepend 'Arizona'. |
| 2010-05-20 07:18 | Diff · History | 165 | →Profiling: R; indented previous reply. |
| 2010-05-20 06:41 | Diff · History | 1,936 | →Profiling: R. |
| 2010-05-20 05:53 | Diff · History | 952 | →70 cities and neutrality: R to DeadBoltSecurity. |
| 2010-05-20 05:41 | Diff · History | 284 | →FAIR and Pearce background relevancy: |
| 2010-05-20 05:35 | Diff · History | 319 | →"The act makes it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying legal documents" -Wikipedia: |
| 2010-05-20 01:47 | Diff · History | 178 | →70 cities and neutrality: R: leave the wording as is. |
| 2010-05-19 23:59 | Diff · History | 997 | →"The act makes it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying legal documents" -Wikipedia: |
| 2010-05-19 09:36 | Diff · History | 592 | →70 cities and neutrality: R to DeadBoltSecurity. |
| 2010-05-18 22:57 | Diff · History | 393 | →Where is the misrepresentation by the obama adminstration?: |
| 2010-05-18 10:45 | Diff · History | 423 | →"The act makes it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying legal documents" -Wikipedia: |
| 2010-05-14 00:12 | Diff · History | 948 | →Clearer, Please?: R |
| 2010-05-11 01:40 | Diff · History | 575 | →Article title and move: |
| 2010-05-11 01:10 | Diff · History | 404 | →Article title and move: Searches seem to work for me. |
| 2010-05-10 23:53 | Diff · History | 432 | →Article title and move: Minnesota has introduced a bill by the same name. |
| 2010-05-10 22:27 | Diff · History | 663 | →Article title and move: Suggest prepending 'Arizona'. |
| 2010-05-10 20:27 | Diff · History | 259 | →Article title and move: Obvious issue we need to consider. |
| 2010-05-10 05:30 | Diff · History | 582 | →Article title and move: Vote for article title. |
| 2010-05-10 01:40 | Diff · History | 640 | →Article title and move: R to 67.246.175.103 on article name. |
| 2010-05-09 23:46 | Diff · History | 1,670 | →Mentioning other recent Arizona actions: new section |
| 2010-05-08 08:21 | Diff · History | 1,232 | →Nazi-stuff (rebound): Additional reply to peterblaise. |
| 2010-05-07 22:16 | Diff · History | 654 | →HB2162: Reminder of the need for reasonable suspicion to inquire and probable cause to arrest. |
| 2010-05-07 01:54 | Diff · History | 3,079 | →Alien and immigrant: Reply, and then some. |
| 2010-05-07 00:40 | Diff · History | 2,263 | →nomanculture: New subsection summarizing nomenclature and the reasons for it. |
| 2010-05-06 22:39 | Diff · History | 649 | →Citations for racial profiling in lead section.: Another example of fact vs. opinion. |
| 2010-05-06 19:59 | Diff · History | 2,453 | →Citations for racial profiling in lead section.: |
| 2010-05-06 19:21 | Diff · History | 684 | →Mention of criticism and support in lead section: |
| 2010-05-06 04:39 | Diff · History | 465 | →Citations for racial profiling in lead section.: Comment on other citation. |
| 2010-05-06 04:19 | Diff · History | 314 | →Citations for racial profiling in lead section.: ec |
| 2010-05-06 03:48 | Diff · History | 1,332 | →Citations for racial profiling in lead section.: new section |
| 2010-05-06 03:26 | Diff · History | 2,665 | →Secondary Offense?: Yes, a secondary offense. |
| 2010-05-05 07:23 | Diff · History | 465 | →Mention of criticism and support in lead section: ec |
| 2010-05-05 07:01 | Diff · History | 820 | →Mention of criticism and support in lead section: new section |
| 2010-05-04 23:23 | Diff · History | 726 | →Limitation on number of notes for one statement: new section |
| 2010-05-04 23:10 | Diff · History | 443 | →SB1070 or SB 1070?: Comment on spaces but no periods. |
| 2010-05-04 18:33 | Diff · History | 516 | →SB1070 or SB 1070?: Official designations include the space. |
| 2010-05-04 18:06 | Diff · History | 1,333 | →Article title and move: The law isn't just SB 1070. |
| 2010-05-04 05:18 | Diff · History | 179 | →Vivek Malhotra op-ed: Comment on qualifying timing of comment. |
| 2010-05-04 05:10 | Diff · History | 259 | →Edits of 29–30 April 2010: Struck entire "scenario". |
| 2010-05-04 03:33 | Diff · History | 1,059 | →Living while brown: |
| 2010-05-04 02:29 | Diff · History | 343 | →Martin Luther King: |
| 2010-05-04 02:26 | Diff · History | 588 | →Vivek Malhotra op-ed: new section |
| 2010-05-04 01:29 | Diff · History | 709 | →Living while brown: |
| 2010-05-04 01:00 | Diff · History | 234 | →nomanculture: ec |
| 2010-05-04 00:57 | Diff · History | 798 | →nomanculture: |
| 2010-05-04 00:27 | Diff · History | 245 | →Lead section: Comment on removing tag and adding refs. |
| 2010-05-03 23:58 | Diff · History | 231 | →Lead section: ec |
| 2010-05-03 22:26 | Diff · History | 500 | →Lead section: new section |
| 2010-05-03 22:16 | Diff · History | 262 | →nomanculture: |
| 2010-05-03 20:40 | Diff · History | 162 | →nomanculture: |
| 2010-05-03 20:30 | Diff · History | 400 | →nomanculture: |
| 2010-05-03 20:22 | Diff · History | 502 | →Bold Text: |
| 2010-05-03 20:16 | Diff · History | 693 | →Living while brown: |
| 2010-05-03 18:58 | Diff · History | 360 | →SB1070 or SB 1070?: new section |
| 2010-05-03 18:43 | Diff · History | 138 | →photo request: Don't agree. |
| 2010-05-03 18:41 | Diff · History | 745 | →Living while brown: Agree that it's POV. |
| 2010-05-03 07:33 | Diff · History | 131 | →Nuremberg and Pass laws section (purposed): Bad idea. |
| 2010-05-03 07:30 | Diff · History | 381 | →Bold Text: |
| 2010-05-03 07:19 | Diff · History | 4 | →Bold Text: Fixed sense of NPOV. |
| 2010-05-03 07:18 | Diff · History | 299 | →Bold Text: Unrelated to title and accordingly inappropriate. |
| 2010-05-03 01:33 | Diff · History | 194 | →Numbers as words: |
| 2010-05-02 21:23 | Diff · History | 206 | →Numbers as words: |
| 2010-05-02 20:54 | Diff · History | 749 | →Numbers as words: new section |
| 2010-05-01 18:45 | Diff · History | 380 | →Accuracy: Reminder of new language. |
| 2010-05-01 18:41 | Diff · History | 322 | →Profiling: Time will tell, courts will decide; we can't speculate. |
| 2010-05-01 01:49 | Diff · History | 44 | →Edit of 29 April 2010: Fixed section title; clarified last point in "scenario". |
| 2010-05-01 01:39 | Diff · History | -249 | →Edits of 29–30 April 2010: Revised "scenario" to reflect changes of HB2162 |
| 2010-05-01 00:41 | Diff · History | 799 | →Edit of 29 April 2010: Comment on effect of HB2162; fixed spelling of Kobach. |
| 2010-04-30 20:40 | Diff · History | 1,791 | →Edit of 29 April 2010: Reply to Seb az86556; comment on meaning of 'lawful detention'. |
| 2010-04-30 19:39 | Diff · History | 245 | →Audience and terminology: new section |
| 2010-04-29 10:19 | Diff · History | 2,521 | →Edit of 29 April 2010: new section |
All times are in UTC.