Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Jakew • Talk:Sexual effects of circumcision • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Talk:Sexual effects of circumcision (Log · Page History)
User Jakew (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 114
Minor edits 1 (0.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 18.2
Added (bytes)2 71,769
Deleted (bytes) -3,052
Minor edits · 1 (0.9%)
Major edits · 113 (99.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 114 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 114 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2011-05-24 15:58 Diff · History 1,679 hammond
2010-11-26 18:23 Diff · History 1,398 dalton addition
2010-06-04 08:21 Diff · History 120 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-27 18:35 Diff · History 171 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-27 16:25 Diff · History 238 →Misleading Summary: edit reply
2010-05-27 09:31 Diff · History 1,613 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-26 19:49 Diff · History 684 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-26 19:23 Diff · History 377 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-26 18:46 Diff · History 935 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-26 17:51 Diff · History 295 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-05-26 08:41 Diff · History 271 →Misleading Summary: r
2010-04-16 17:28 Diff · History 379 →Denniston study: r
2010-03-09 17:08 Diff · History 408 →POV Tag reasons: explain undue weight, again
2010-03-05 21:10 Diff · History 258 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-03-05 18:26 Diff · History 283 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-03-01 11:27 Diff · History 1,155 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-03-01 11:14 Diff · History 183 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: how so?
2010-02-28 10:49 Diff · History 12 →POV Tag reasons: changing image to a thumbnail to aid readability of discussion
2010-02-28 10:46 Diff · History 234 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-02-26 17:22 Diff · History 1 →POV Tag reasons: convert image to link - we all know what it looks like, and it's getting in the way of reading the discussion
2010-02-26 17:21 Diff · History 207 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-02-26 10:44 Diff · History 345 →POV Tag reasons: re using appropriate tags
2010-02-26 10:29 Diff · History 476 →POV Tag reasons: r
2010-02-17 10:50 Diff · History 1,886 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: replies
2010-02-17 10:38 Diff · History 758 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: reformatting
2010-02-17 09:59 Diff · History 167 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: r
2010-02-12 15:55 Diff · History 2,321 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: r
2010-02-12 14:59 Diff · History 416 →Introduction and Sensitivity graph: replies
2010-01-22 10:35 Diff · History 192 →Masood 2005: r
2010-01-21 12:14 Diff · History 1,451 →Masood 2005: r
2010-01-11 10:44 Diff · History 106 →Kim and Pang 2007: r
2009-11-29 10:05 Diff · History 174 →Verification needed: r
2009-08-12 19:39 Diff · History 370 →13th century French rabbi said circumcision promoted premature ejaculation, decreased libido and a more spiritual disposition in men: comment
2009-04-17 08:36 Diff · History 757 →The Mucous membrane Issue & Circumcision: reply
2009-02-28 19:40 Diff · History -1 →Better/worse: moving table to left
2009-02-28 19:40 Diff · History 228 →Better/worse: yes...
2009-02-28 12:17 Diff · History 566 →Narrower format: very nice
2009-02-24 09:58 Diff · History 1,119 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: nice edit, not so sure about the section though
2009-02-22 15:04 Diff · History 2,642 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: reply to beejaypii
2009-02-22 10:50 Diff · History 2,785 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: reply to beejaypii
2009-02-21 21:37 Diff · History 1,395 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: reply to coppertwig, and comment on recent edit
2009-02-19 13:01 Diff · History 921 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: update
2009-02-18 12:17 Diff · History 2,922 →Waskett & Morris, and Young: comment
2009-02-15 21:20 Diff · History 269 →Verification needed: reply with link to google scholar
2009-02-15 11:30 Diff · History 2,532 waskett & morris, and young
2009-02-15 10:43 Diff · History 215 →Removal of Bleustein 2003: agree
2008-10-20 20:15 Diff · History 1,111 →Removal of Bleustein 2003: comments (at last)
2008-10-19 21:47 Diff · History 1,582 →Letters: clear up some misunderstanding
2008-10-18 11:21 Diff · History 230 →Removal of Bleustein 2003: will check
2008-10-17 23:33 Diff · History 388 →Removal of Bleustein 2003: reply
2008-10-17 23:24 Diff · History 157 removal of bleustein 2003
2008-10-17 22:50 Diff · History 592 →Bailey et al study: if a statement isn't in the abstract, it may be in the full text
2008-10-17 16:21 Diff · History 863 see also
2008-10-17 16:13 Diff · History 230 →"Female arousal disorder": agree
2008-10-14 14:52 Diff · History 371 →Organization of sections: thoughts
2008-09-22 19:31 Diff · History 375 →The table should be removed until it's fixed: suggestion
2008-09-22 14:16 Diff · History 964 →The table should be removed until it's fixed: comment
2008-05-05 10:47 Diff · History 462 →Regarding sensitivity of the foreskin: agree
2008-04-08 23:06 Diff · History 235 →Opposition: where?
2008-01-10 13:41 Diff · History 294 →New study: cited
2007-08-19 16:21 Diff · History 183 →Details of moving content here: reply
2007-08-19 16:18 Diff · History 352 →References: bleustein
2007-08-19 15:56 Diff · History 152 →References: i'm happy to do that
2007-07-05 10:20 Diff · History 216 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: r
2007-06-12 15:25 Diff · History 88 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: ok
2007-06-12 10:41 Diff · History 1,188 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-11 10:17 Diff · History 209 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-10 14:33 Diff · History 787 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to Michael
2007-06-10 10:23 Diff · History 644 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: mostly ok
2007-06-09 17:00 Diff · History 401 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply
2007-06-09 10:30 Diff · History 1,016 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: may be suitable for that article, but not here
2007-06-08 16:25 Diff · History 396 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: OR
2007-06-08 09:43 Diff · History 660 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: OR in this article
2007-06-07 16:02 Diff · History 533 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-06 12:20 Diff · History 2,217 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-05 10:07 Diff · History 122 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply
2007-06-04 14:36 Diff · History 1,529 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: suggested alterations
2007-06-04 13:57 Diff · History 776 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-02 14:29 Diff · History 186 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply
2007-06-02 10:36 Diff · History 1,488 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-06-01 07:51 Diff · History 433 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-05-31 10:08 Diff · History 1,100 →Criticism of Sorrells et al: reply to michael
2007-05-30 13:47 Diff · History 868 criticism of sorrells et al
2007-05-08 13:42 Diff · History 461 →Additions to Female arousal section: agree
2007-05-08 12:22 Diff · History 309 →Additions to Female arousal section: appears to be a quote
2007-04-27 14:23 Diff · History 227 →Source for Sorrells funding?: reply
2007-04-27 12:17 Diff · History 325 →Source for Sorrells funding?: question
2007-04-01 17:08 Diff · History 144 →Source for Sorrells funding?: the study itself
2007-01-17 17:40 Diff · History 2,446 →An evolutionary angle?:
2007-01-01 20:39 Diff · History 634 →An evolutionary angle?:
2006-12-12 13:45 Diff · History 466 →Inherent flaws in several of the studies:
2006-09-20 20:21 Diff · History 361 →Sexual effects of foreskin amputation:
2006-09-20 15:33 Diff · History 279 →Sexual effects of foreskin amputation:
2006-09-09 16:35 Diff · History 277 →Inherent flaws in several of the studies:
2006-04-19 16:48 Diff · History 269 →How about a section on sexuality for context?:
2006-04-16 10:32 Diff · History 593 →The table should be removed until it's fixed: assume good faith
2006-04-15 20:03 Diff · History -3,051 →Relevant quotes: delete section that does nothing but duplicate text elsewhere on this page
2006-04-15 20:02 Diff · History 307 →The table should be removed until it's fixed:
2006-04-15 09:53 Diff · History 375 →The table should be removed until it's fixed:
2006-04-15 09:49 Diff · History 226 →The table should be removed:
2006-04-14 16:56 Diff · History 1,012 →The table should be removed until it's fixed:
2006-04-14 16:50 Diff · History 134 →The table should be removed:
2006-04-14 16:48 Diff · History 1,159 →The table should be removed:
2006-04-13 16:49 Diff · History 644 →The table should be removed:
2006-04-13 16:17 Diff · History 450 →The table should be removed:
2006-04-13 09:46 Diff · History 67 →The table should be removed:
2006-01-17 11:47 Diff · History 142 →Personal testimony moved from article:
2006-01-14 13:03 Diff · History 170 →Provenance of the Studies:
2006-01-14 12:17 Diff · History 120 →Provenance of the Studies:
2006-01-13 22:29 Diff · History 299 →Practical experiment to demonstrate a possible effect of circumcision:
2006-01-13 18:09 Diff · History 151 →Practical experiment to demonstrate a possible effect of circumcision:
2006-01-13 18:08 Diff · History 68 →Practical experiment to demonstrate an effect of circumcision:
2006-01-11 11:48 Diff · History 185 →Stubbing:
2005-09-21 13:17 Diff · History 157 →Reading the article in conjunction with the original research:
All times are in UTC.