Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Ezhao02Kuomintang • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Kuomintang (Log · Page History)
User Ezhao02 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 73
Minor edits 44 (60.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits 9 (12.3%)
Reverted edits 6 (8.2%)
atbe1 9.1
Added (bytes)2 3,639
Deleted (bytes) -7,786
Minor edits · 44 (60.3%)
Major edits · 29 (39.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 9 (12.3%)
Manual edits · 64 (87.7%)
Reverted edits · 6 (8.2%)
Unreverted edits · 67 (91.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 3,283 (reverted)  It's good to remove the citations from the infobox, but they should be retained in the article body; this section is also quite pro-KMT
Diff · History -36 a one-party system isn't really an ideology
Diff · History -56 Undid revision 1022882987 by 49.195.210.91 (talk) probably should discuss first
Diff · History -115 not actually in the source, which only mentions a liberal–conservative divide [i.e., there are some members who are more liberal and others who are more conservative] within the party, which is completely different from saying the party itself is liberal-conservative
Diff · History 2 en dash for page ranges
Diff · History 10 Party assets: copyediting the previous edit; can someone else determine whether the source is reliable?
Diff · History -51 maybe this would be better, since it's less repetitive? [see talk for explanation]
Diff · History -35 Restored revision 1018189450 by DrIdiot (talk): Revert good faith edit: the article makes it clear that the KMT had botha left wing and a right wing, and refs aren't necessarily needed in the infobox per MOS:INFOBOXREF
Diff · History -2 maybe this wording in the infobox is better
Diff · History 50 The KMT had both left and right wings while it was in the mainland. The wording can be changed if necessary.
Diff · History -10 grammar
Diff · History -255 Restored revision 1014665323 by Dabberoni15 (talk): Rv unnecessary edits
Diff · History 8 it may be a bit confusing to use the present tense here
Diff · History 7 i don't think this shoudl be capitalized
Diff · History 0 period before <ref> tags
Diff · History -73 Reverted 2 edits by 49.195.31.223 (talk): Please don't use the "year" parameter
Diff · History -78 Undid revision 1010950816 by 49.180.124.159 (talk) Actually, you're supposed to use date instead of year [see Template:Cite web#Date]. Also, Chinese Nationalist Party is a more common English name.
Diff · History -26 no notes
Diff · History -46 Undid revision 1010648978 by 184.147.137.223 (talk) These sidebars aren't' really useful, since they only talk about the PRC
Diff · History 142 Restored revision 1006371506 by Ezhao02 (talk): Revert to last good version
Diff · History 49 fix citation formatting
Diff · History 113 added back things that shouldn't have been removed
Diff · History -3,617 (reverted)  This is why I opposed adding any historical factions in the first place. All of these descriptors are accurate, but the infobox is intended to be a concise summary, and listing all of these clearly goes against that guideline.
Diff · History -33 fix in-text reference
Diff · History -360 fix citation formatting; remove unnecessary archive links
Diff · History -57 these are my intended formatting fixes
Diff · History 1,479 Undid revision 1005107115 by Ezhao02 (talk) not what i intended to do, sorry
Diff · History -1,479 (reverted)  fix formatting
Diff · History -976 Reverted 3 edits by 2A02:8388:7045:8480:B0E3:DC0E:825A:DDFA (talk)
Diff · History -17 copyediting
Diff · History -2 copyediting
Diff · History 5 Undid revision 1002226965 by Turguniev600 (talk) not the common name of these ideas
Diff · History 0 fix per sources
Diff · History 214 copyediting
Diff · History -6 remove extra word
Diff · History 4 Founding and Sun Yat-sen era: more copyediting
Diff · History -20 copyedit the section addressed by IP's edit [which was not a copyedit]
Diff · History -35 simplify link
Diff · History 0 move line break
Diff · History 11 use the more common name
Diff · History -22 not necessary to explain that Taipei is the Taiwanese capital
Diff · History -55 Undid revision 990710664 by 58.176.110.101 (talk) not the common name of the ideas
Diff · History -1 The comma is actually incorrect, since there is no subject in the second part of the sentence.
Diff · History -4 (reverted)  ce: remove "the"
Diff · History -19 Undid revision 982087683 by 142.114.196.125 (talk) the ROC is not part of the PRC, and these pages talk about the PRC
Diff · History -19 Information about the PRC shouldn't be included here
Diff · History 94 partial rv
Diff · History -421 The sources used don't describe the KMT as liberal-conservative. Instead, they mention a divide between more liberal factions within the KMT [not to say that these factions are purely liberal] and more conservative factions.
Diff · History -26 no access date without url
Diff · History -96 use jstor instead of url, since it's more accessible; remove unnecessary ref names
Diff · History -965 not sure if this is due. seems liike one small event in the long history of the KMT
Diff · History -424 "right-wing" is also not in this source [see https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Cs_Liu/publication/322311869_The_Spiral_of_Deinstitutionalization_Untangled_An_Observation_about_the_Field_Opinion_within_Kuomintang_against_Public_Opinion_during_the_2016_Presidential_Election_Campaign/links/5aae649b458515ecebe88632/The-Spiral-of-Deinstitutionalization-Untangled-An-Observation-about-the-Field-Opinion-within-Kuomintang-against-Public-Opinion-during-the-2016-Presidential-Election-Campaign.pdf]
Diff · History 67 more citation formatting
Diff · History -129 removed source that doesn't support claim [https://www.scmp.com/print/news/china/politics/article/3037183/former-taiwan-premier-chang-san-cheng-joins-kmt-ticket-vice]; format journal citation
Diff · History 3 Undid revision 972239826 by Vif12vf (talk) Infobox is too wide without the line break. I'd say that the line break looks okay here, since it's just so long.
Diff · History -310 removed a source [https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA334533/page/n35/mode/2up] because it's an interview with a DPP member and is specifically talking about factions within the KMT
Diff · History -3 I missed some spaces.
Diff · History 1 fix pipe trick
Diff · History -42 get rid of many double spaces in quote
Diff · History -651 not a good source for "right-wing" because [1] it's journalistic, not academic, and [2] it's not clear whether they intend to distinguish "right-wing" from "center-right"
Diff · History -29 Undid revision 970492242 by 70.49.10.82 (talk) There aren't any notes on this page.
Diff · History -143 also not a dead url?
Diff · History -549 not a dead url?
Diff · History -4 changed "firstly" and "secondly" to "first" and "second"
Diff · History 2 changed improper hyphen to en dash
Diff · History -234 (reverted)  Tried changing the political position to a possible compromise; I got no response when I proposed this on the talk page.
Diff · History 26 Line break looks better: the infobox is too wide without these line breaks
Diff · History -692 I don't think it's necessary to list both "liberal conservatism" and "national conservatism". Certain factions might be described as such, but overall, the best descriptor is "conservative". Additionally, listing only "conservatism" saves space in the infobox.
Diff · History -364 This source says, "since 2000 [the KMT] has reverted to the centre right stance of the early 1990s." When the source mentions right-wing, it is either describing the or the old (1991) positions held by the KMT, not the modern party.
Diff · History -1,078 (reverted)  If you don't want to have the KMT and the DPP at equidistant positions from the center on the political spectrum, I think it would be best to list the KMT as center-right and the DPP as center to center-left, since there are comparatively more sources describing the DPP as centrist than there are describing the KMT as right-wingn
Diff · History -533 rv: one source isn't enough to change the political position, especially when the source in question does not differentiate between "centre-right" and "right-wing"
Diff · History 17
Diff · History 1,335
All times are in UTC.
Bahnsport-Info

Kostenfrei
Ansehen