Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Kuomintang (Log · Page History) |
User | Ezhao02 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 73 |
Minor edits | 44 (60.3%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 9 (12.3%) |
Reverted edits | 6 (8.2%) |
atbe1 | 9.1 |
Added (bytes)2 | 3,639 |
Deleted (bytes) | -7,786 |
Minor edits
·
44 (60.3%)
Major edits
·
29 (39.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
9 (12.3%)
Manual edits
·
64 (87.7%)
Reverted edits
·
6 (8.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
67 (91.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-18 21:35 | Diff · History | 3,283 | (reverted) It's good to remove the citations from the infobox, but they should be retained in the article body; this section is also quite pro-KMT |
2021-08-03 16:13 | Diff · History | -36 | a one-party system isn't really an ideology |
2021-05-14 00:28 | Diff · History | -56 | Undid revision 1022882987 by 49.195.210.91 (talk) probably should discuss first |
2021-05-06 02:13 | Diff · History | -115 | not actually in the source, which only mentions a liberal–conservative divide [i.e., there are some members who are more liberal and others who are more conservative] within the party, which is completely different from saying the party itself is liberal-conservative |
2021-04-25 14:26 | Diff · History | 2 | en dash for page ranges |
2021-04-25 02:27 | Diff · History | 10 | →Party assets: copyediting the previous edit; can someone else determine whether the source is reliable? |
2021-04-20 01:15 | Diff · History | -51 | maybe this would be better, since it's less repetitive? [see talk for explanation] |
2021-04-19 03:31 | Diff · History | -35 | Restored revision 1018189450 by DrIdiot (talk): Revert good faith edit: the article makes it clear that the KMT had botha left wing and a right wing, and refs aren't necessarily needed in the infobox per MOS:INFOBOXREF |
2021-04-16 12:48 | Diff · History | -2 | maybe this wording in the infobox is better |
2021-04-15 13:30 | Diff · History | 50 | The KMT had both left and right wings while it was in the mainland. The wording can be changed if necessary. |
2021-04-15 13:20 | Diff · History | -10 | grammar |
2021-04-01 15:40 | Diff · History | -255 | Restored revision 1014665323 by Dabberoni15 (talk): Rv unnecessary edits |
2021-03-26 16:16 | Diff · History | 8 | it may be a bit confusing to use the present tense here |
2021-03-16 12:32 | Diff · History | 7 | i don't think this shoudl be capitalized |
2021-03-12 13:08 | Diff · History | 0 | period before <ref> tags |
2021-03-09 13:07 | Diff · History | -73 | Reverted 2 edits by 49.195.31.223 (talk): Please don't use the "year" parameter |
2021-03-08 13:13 | Diff · History | -78 | Undid revision 1010950816 by 49.180.124.159 (talk) Actually, you're supposed to use date instead of year [see Template:Cite web#Date]. Also, Chinese Nationalist Party is a more common English name. |
2021-03-06 21:53 | Diff · History | -26 | no notes |
2021-03-06 21:52 | Diff · History | -46 | Undid revision 1010648978 by 184.147.137.223 (talk) These sidebars aren't' really useful, since they only talk about the PRC |
2021-02-14 01:47 | Diff · History | 142 | Restored revision 1006371506 by Ezhao02 (talk): Revert to last good version |
2021-02-12 14:56 | Diff · History | 49 | fix citation formatting |
2021-02-11 13:30 | Diff · History | 113 | added back things that shouldn't have been removed |
2021-02-09 13:17 | Diff · History | -3,617 | (reverted) This is why I opposed adding any historical factions in the first place. All of these descriptors are accurate, but the infobox is intended to be a concise summary, and listing all of these clearly goes against that guideline. |
2021-02-08 17:59 | Diff · History | -33 | fix in-text reference |
2021-02-06 01:05 | Diff · History | -360 | fix citation formatting; remove unnecessary archive links |
2021-02-06 00:59 | Diff · History | -57 | these are my intended formatting fixes |
2021-02-06 00:58 | Diff · History | 1,479 | Undid revision 1005107115 by Ezhao02 (talk) not what i intended to do, sorry |
2021-02-06 00:58 | Diff · History | -1,479 | (reverted) fix formatting |
2021-02-03 01:39 | Diff · History | -976 | Reverted 3 edits by 2A02:8388:7045:8480:B0E3:DC0E:825A:DDFA (talk) |
2021-02-02 14:24 | Diff · History | -17 | copyediting |
2021-01-24 18:40 | Diff · History | -2 | copyediting |
2021-01-24 02:23 | Diff · History | 5 | Undid revision 1002226965 by Turguniev600 (talk) not the common name of these ideas |
2021-01-22 12:54 | Diff · History | 0 | fix per sources |
2021-01-21 13:24 | Diff · History | 214 | copyediting |
2021-01-21 03:09 | Diff · History | -6 | remove extra word |
2021-01-10 14:45 | Diff · History | 4 | →Founding and Sun Yat-sen era: more copyediting |
2021-01-10 14:44 | Diff · History | -20 | copyedit the section addressed by IP's edit [which was not a copyedit] |
2021-01-09 02:07 | Diff · History | -35 | simplify link |
2021-01-06 19:36 | Diff · History | 0 | move line break |
2021-01-06 19:35 | Diff · History | 11 | use the more common name |
2020-12-07 12:45 | Diff · History | -22 | not necessary to explain that Taipei is the Taiwanese capital |
2020-11-27 14:05 | Diff · History | -55 | Undid revision 990710664 by 58.176.110.101 (talk) not the common name of the ideas |
2020-11-22 20:07 | Diff · History | -1 | The comma is actually incorrect, since there is no subject in the second part of the sentence. |
2020-11-22 13:54 | Diff · History | -4 | (reverted) ce: remove "the" |
2020-10-06 12:14 | Diff · History | -19 | Undid revision 982087683 by 142.114.196.125 (talk) the ROC is not part of the PRC, and these pages talk about the PRC |
2020-10-01 16:52 | Diff · History | -19 | Information about the PRC shouldn't be included here |
2020-10-01 16:50 | Diff · History | 94 | partial rv |
2020-09-26 00:29 | Diff · History | -421 | The sources used don't describe the KMT as liberal-conservative. Instead, they mention a divide between more liberal factions within the KMT [not to say that these factions are purely liberal] and more conservative factions. |
2020-09-20 01:24 | Diff · History | -26 | no access date without url |
2020-09-20 01:23 | Diff · History | -96 | use jstor instead of url, since it's more accessible; remove unnecessary ref names |
2020-09-17 17:48 | Diff · History | -965 | not sure if this is due. seems liike one small event in the long history of the KMT |
2020-08-12 16:22 | Diff · History | -424 | "right-wing" is also not in this source [see https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Cs_Liu/publication/322311869_The_Spiral_of_Deinstitutionalization_Untangled_An_Observation_about_the_Field_Opinion_within_Kuomintang_against_Public_Opinion_during_the_2016_Presidential_Election_Campaign/links/5aae649b458515ecebe88632/The-Spiral-of-Deinstitutionalization-Untangled-An-Observation-about-the-Field-Opinion-within-Kuomintang-against-Public-Opinion-during-the-2016-Presidential-Election-Campaign.pdf] |
2020-08-12 16:20 | Diff · History | 67 | more citation formatting |
2020-08-12 16:18 | Diff · History | -129 | removed source that doesn't support claim [https://www.scmp.com/print/news/china/politics/article/3037183/former-taiwan-premier-chang-san-cheng-joins-kmt-ticket-vice]; format journal citation |
2020-08-11 00:58 | Diff · History | 3 | Undid revision 972239826 by Vif12vf (talk) Infobox is too wide without the line break. I'd say that the line break looks okay here, since it's just so long. |
2020-08-04 02:28 | Diff · History | -310 | removed a source [https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA334533/page/n35/mode/2up] because it's an interview with a DPP member and is specifically talking about factions within the KMT |
2020-08-04 01:13 | Diff · History | -3 | I missed some spaces. |
2020-08-04 01:12 | Diff · History | 1 | fix pipe trick |
2020-08-04 01:11 | Diff · History | -42 | get rid of many double spaces in quote |
2020-08-04 01:04 | Diff · History | -651 | not a good source for "right-wing" because [1] it's journalistic, not academic, and [2] it's not clear whether they intend to distinguish "right-wing" from "center-right" |
2020-08-01 21:49 | Diff · History | -29 | Undid revision 970492242 by 70.49.10.82 (talk) There aren't any notes on this page. |
2020-07-27 13:58 | Diff · History | -143 | also not a dead url? |
2020-07-27 13:57 | Diff · History | -549 | not a dead url? |
2020-06-17 14:04 | Diff · History | -4 | changed "firstly" and "secondly" to "first" and "second" |
2020-05-28 02:32 | Diff · History | 2 | changed improper hyphen to en dash |
2020-05-25 02:37 | Diff · History | -234 | (reverted) Tried changing the political position to a possible compromise; I got no response when I proposed this on the talk page. |
2020-05-17 14:49 | Diff · History | 26 | Line break looks better: the infobox is too wide without these line breaks |
2020-05-12 21:14 | Diff · History | -692 | I don't think it's necessary to list both "liberal conservatism" and "national conservatism". Certain factions might be described as such, but overall, the best descriptor is "conservative". Additionally, listing only "conservatism" saves space in the infobox. |
2020-05-12 15:30 | Diff · History | -364 | This source says, "since 2000 [the KMT] has reverted to the centre right stance of the early 1990s." When the source mentions right-wing, it is either describing the or the old (1991) positions held by the KMT, not the modern party. |
2020-05-09 20:32 | Diff · History | -1,078 | (reverted) If you don't want to have the KMT and the DPP at equidistant positions from the center on the political spectrum, I think it would be best to list the KMT as center-right and the DPP as center to center-left, since there are comparatively more sources describing the DPP as centrist than there are describing the KMT as right-wingn |
2020-04-12 21:09 | Diff · History | -533 | rv: one source isn't enough to change the political position, especially when the source in question does not differentiate between "centre-right" and "right-wing" |
2019-12-26 02:17 | Diff · History | 17 | |
2019-12-26 02:16 | Diff · History | 1,335 |
All times are in UTC.