Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Doug WellerTamil inscriptions • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Tamil inscriptions (Log · Page History)
User Doug Weller (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 10
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 2 (20%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 175.5
Added (bytes)2 0
Deleted (bytes) -15,627
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 10 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 2 (20%)
Manual edits · 8 (80%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 10 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -505 Reverted good faith edits by Tirukodimadachengunrur (talk): We need peer reviewed material for archaeology, not news articles
Diff · History -6,234 Restored revision 1208341321 by GreenC bot (talk): Main articles do not back these dates, media sources not reliable for the subject
Diff · History -594 2nd century BCE: dlunsource
Diff · History -498 3rd century BCE: one is media,.the other unidentifiable
Diff · History -1,173 3rd century BCE: even worse, that was an oped in the opinion section
Diff · History -3,004 Ancient Tamil Epigraphy: some cleanup, we can't use the media as a source for archaeolgoy
Diff · History -39 Reverting edit(s) by Theriyala (talk) to rev. 1130774550 by GhostInTheMachine: Reverting good faith edits source? and this is not a name "''Thisan dated 6th century BC''" (RW 16.1)
Diff · History -1,715 Reverted good faith edits by Ponmalaiganapathy (talk): Made a mess (TW)
Diff · History -1,118 6th century BCE: again we should not be using media sources - we're dealing with highly controversial claims here
Diff · History -747 6th century BCE: we need independent archaeological sources or at least independent discussion of these finds, not government publications or the media
All times are in UTC.