Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Nimrod (Log · Page History) |
| User | Doug Weller (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 48 |
| Minor edits | 4 (8.3%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 21 (43.8%) |
| Reverted edits | 4 (8.3%) |
| atbe1 | 66.8 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 52,282 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -5,423 |
Minor edits
·
4 (8.3%)
Major edits
·
44 (91.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
21 (43.8%)
Manual edits
·
27 (56.2%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (8.3%)
Unreverted edits
·
44 (91.7%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 13:33 | Diff · History | 3,110 | Restored revision 1131967764 by 79.97.25.152 (talk): These belong |
| 2022-09-08 13:32 | Diff · History | -228 | Restored revision 1105277958 by Arrrmand (talk): Trivia, a very minor mention |
| 2022-05-22 14:29 | Diff · History | -158 | Reverting edit(s) by Markelliotbergman (talk) to rev. 1088668843 by Halbared: Reverting good faith not cited properly, it's Ted Gioia, no r, we avoid "however", and he's not a reliable source for this (RW 16.1) |
| 2022-01-24 07:28 | Diff · History | 56 | Restored revision 1067335583 by 80.3.238.120 (talk): Version by IP seems correct, “other” makes no sense as no non-biblical source is mentioned |
| 2022-01-16 15:55 | Diff · History | 4 | Restored revision 1065974111 by 80.246.137.53 (talk): This is the longstanding text. I don't see Genesis 10 confirming this in any case |
| 2020-11-14 15:44 | Diff · History | 0 | Protected "Nimrod": Persistent vandalism ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 15:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 15:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC))) |
| 2020-08-01 09:22 | Diff · History | 141 | Reverted to revision 970312162 by Doug Weller (talk): "Attempts to match Nimrod with historically attested figures have failed. Nimrod may not represent any one personage known to history" seems a better way of expressing the situation (TW) |
| 2020-07-30 15:27 | Diff · History | 29 | →See also: restoring this, not sure it belongs |
| 2020-07-30 15:23 | Diff · History | 112 | Reverted to revision 970188533 by El C (talk): Content changes not an improvement (TW) |
| 2020-07-28 17:51 | Diff · History | 137 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 968473110 by Kerplunk1972 (talk): Not an improvement (TW) |
| 2020-05-27 09:11 | Diff · History | -88 | →Evil Nimrod vs. the righteous Abraham: song is linked, we don't need to tell them to read the article |
| 2020-05-27 09:09 | Diff · History | -150 | →Evil Nimrod vs. the righteous Abraham: dl something that isn't actually a source |
| 2020-05-27 09:07 | Diff · History | -816 | A website of the Cooperative Office for Dawah in Rawdah, it considers neither sunnis nor shiites to be true muslims and thus is clearly not a reliable source - replacing with cn tag, removing some old cn tagged material |
| 2020-04-18 10:41 | Diff · History | 2 | Reverted edits by 216.137.234.236 (talk) to last version by El C |
| 2020-03-01 16:44 | Diff · History | 45,349 | Reverted to revision 938225536 by ClueBot NG (talk): Pov, inappropriate, and copyvio (TW) |
| 2019-01-29 11:57 | Diff · History | -24 | Reverted to revision 880605026 by Doug Weller (talk): They've failed - there's clearly no consensus, that's failure (TW) |
| 2019-01-28 10:00 | Diff · History | 1 | →top: grammar |
| 2019-01-06 15:14 | Diff · History | 14 | →top: rewording |
| 2018-12-28 15:53 | Diff · History | 482 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 875589320 by Dimadick: There is no "writer", there are several different sources in the article - our articles are based on sources meeting our criteria, not an editor's opinion. (TW) |
| 2018-08-23 08:00 | Diff · History | 44 | Reverted to revision 855032560 by Sheila1988: This is a summary of the article, which backs the text that was repliaced with a pov statement putting forward a religious view as fact. (TW) |
| 2018-05-31 16:12 | Diff · History | -30 | →top: we don't even have to mention historians in the lead, I've revised the sentence to match the text |
| 2018-05-30 20:25 | Diff · History | 504 | Reverted to revision 839297064 by SingAMighty (talk): Sources are in the body of the article, and this is part of the lead, a summary of the article . (TW) |
| 2018-04-03 05:15 | Diff · History | -7 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 833802081 by ClueBot NG (talk): Where is that in the sources? (TW) |
| 2018-01-11 11:38 | Diff · History | -107 | Undid revision 819809014 by 85.65.222.253 (talk) unsourced |
| 2017-11-18 16:25 | Diff · History | -29 | Undid revision 810852242 by AmYisroelChai (talk) this is a summary of the article and "by who" is answered in the article |
| 2017-09-25 18:19 | Diff · History | 66 | Reverted edits by 109.154.115.132 (talk) to last version by אלימיט |
| 2017-07-05 13:20 | Diff · History | -7 | stick with those suggested as part of a conflation in the article's sources |
| 2017-06-01 12:36 | Diff · History | 565 | →Historical interpretations: quote |
| 2017-06-01 12:29 | Diff · History | -1,211 | →Historical interpretations: some of this looks like original research, none of it seems necessary |
| 2017-06-01 12:26 | Diff · History | -223 | →top: just realised this was a duplicate reference, so we don't need it in the lead as well |
| 2017-06-01 11:39 | Diff · History | 673 | Undid revision 783247116 by 172.58.224.132 (talk) partial undo, add another and a source, I'll check to make sure the others are sourced in the article |
| 2017-05-30 05:46 | Diff · History | 674 | (reverted) Undid revision 782900045 by talk) it's sourced. To liking what it says isn't a reason to delete it |
| 2017-03-18 16:58 | Diff · History | 13 | →Traditions and legends: reword bit about Josephus |
| 2017-03-18 16:50 | Diff · History | 21 | →top: describing him as a biblical figure rather than fictional |
| 2017-03-18 13:15 | Diff · History | 18 | →top: change firest sentence of this paragraph to match body of text |
| 2017-03-18 13:13 | Diff · History | -9 | /* top *dl 'However |
| 2017-03-18 13:12 | Diff · History | -20 | →top: chagne "most probable to these include, not that this bit of the lead actually reflects the bodyof the text and shouldn't be removed simply because an IP,- a block evading sock - doesn't like it |
| 2017-03-18 12:54 | Diff · History | 724 | BRD says " Making bold edits is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article, or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again. Instead, begin a discussion with the person who reverted your change to establish con |
| 2017-03-18 12:02 | Diff · History | 0 | →Biblical account: lowe cae |
| 2017-03-18 12:01 | Diff · History | 724 | Undid revision 770856153 by 172.56.37.208 (talk) IP cited BRD, so we shouild do that - IP boldly removed text, another editor restoed it, time to discuss at talk page, that's what BRD sa |
| 2017-02-01 11:17 | Diff · History | -70 | would fail as an RS, it's just another literalist site, maybe spam |
| 2016-06-08 05:20 | Diff · History | -393 | Reverted good faith edits by 213.74.186.109 (talk): Blog Gail's criteria for sources at WP:RS. (TW) |
| 2016-06-03 16:53 | Diff · History | -594 | Reverted edits by 12.249.89.66 (talk) to last version by I dream of horses |
| 2015-12-06 10:38 | Diff · History | -1,141 | Reverted 3 edits by 1STALFBT: Only when other academic sources have discussed this, hopefully more mainstream than Petrovich - note that this editor is promoting Petrovich - username refers to a claim by him. (TW) |
| 2015-08-04 04:52 | Diff · History | 1 | As per the source |
| 2015-06-13 12:06 | Diff · History | 0 | Undid revision 666748672 by 81.132.39.153 (talk)good faith edit but broke link |
| 2015-02-10 11:20 | Diff · History | -125 | not a reference for what the Bible doesn't say |
| 2014-04-01 08:46 | Diff · History | 111 | →top: we need to say something in the lead about failure to identify him as historical - this may need rewording |
All times are in UTC.