Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Djma12Vitamin C megadosage • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Vitamin C megadosage (Log · Page History)
User Djma12 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 92
Minor edits 11 (12%)
(Semi-)automated edits 3 (3.3%)
Reverted edits 1 (1.1%)
atbe1 4.5
Added (bytes)2 3,737
Deleted (bytes) -26,967
Minor edits · 11 (12%)
Major edits · 81 (88%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 3 (3.3%)
Manual edits · 89 (96.7%)
Reverted edits · 1 (1.1%)
Unreverted edits · 91 (98.9%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 2 Politics of vitamin C: removing POV wording
Diff · History 106 Common cold: Redoing for POV
Diff · History -105 Making intro less POV
Diff · History 8 Universal panacea hypothesis: Citation tagging
Diff · History -104 Undid revision 171820912 by 24.34.45.104 (talk) Removed unsourced statement
Diff · History -433 Chance of overdose: Removed text with null citation
Diff · History 17 Advocacy arguments: No citations
Diff · History 17 Advocacy positions: Still no citations
Diff · History 7 Cancer: per the same citation
Diff · History 162 Cancer: Balancing citation by quoting the author's opinion (per citation)
Diff · History -863 Removing redundancy in intro that is already addressed in its own section
Diff · History -10 see citation
Diff · History 12 Let's be specific
Diff · History -7 Please read the citations that are attached. Also, Phase I clinicals only assess saftey, not efficacy.
Diff · History -1,256 Undid revision 157653627 by Healthwise (talk) No additional support for WP:EL criteria given
Diff · History -1,256 (reverted)  Undid revision 157415147 by Lumos3 (talk)Please specify in talk why the inclusion of links would satisy WP:EL, esp undue weight
Diff · History 22 Advocacy arguments: Oops
Diff · History 78 Advocacy arguments: Flagging unsourced
Diff · History -3 word change
Diff · History 36 wikilink
Diff · History 23 Clarifying statement
Diff · History -1,358 Advocacy arguments: Removing weasel word, removing OR
Diff · History -2,319 Potential harmful effects: Removing statement that belongs in another section
Diff · History -55 Potential harmful effects: Removing weasel words
Diff · History -157 Potential harmful effects: Removing unsourced
Diff · History -1,413 Potential harmful effects: Removing unsourced and OR
Diff · History -4,327 Potential harmful effects: Removing sources based upon OrthoMed.com. Also trimming non-relevant information on magnesium, thiamine, etc...
Diff · History -111 Conflicts with prescription drugs: Removing unsourced
Diff · History -358 Possible adverse effects: Removing statement noted supported by supplied source
Diff · History -148 Chance of overdose: Removing unsourced
Diff · History -188 Possible adverse effects: Removing unsourced
Diff · History -318 Possible adverse effects: Removing statement that does not reflect source
Diff · History -101 Possible adverse effects: Removing unsourced
Diff · History 5 Viral diseases, and poisons: removing dead link
Diff · History -57 See also: Removing dead link
Diff · History -106 Universal panacea hypothesis: Removed OR
Diff · History -53 Universal panacea hypothesis: Removing internal link to deleted article
Diff · History -193 Universal panacea hypothesis: Removing internal link to deleted article
Diff · History -19 Side-effects: Removing internal link to deleted articles
Diff · History 154 Alright, adding another citation then.
Diff · History 29 (Please see discussion) Amending intro. Now it includes all sources and is not run-on.
Diff · History 8 Claimed therapeutic applications of high doses: labelling unsourced statement
Diff · History -108 Removing redundancy
Diff · History -47 Moving statement for readability
Diff · History 337 Wait, why was this source removed?
Diff · History 12 grammar
Diff · History -399 Editting intro for readability
Diff · History -49 Side-effects: Removed unsourced statement and corrected statement to reflect citation
Diff · History 115 Cancer: Clarifying what a Phase I trial is.
Diff · History -99 Cancer: Clarifying trial info
Diff · History 7 Cancer: formatting
Diff · History 269 Cancer: Amending claims to reflect citations
Diff · History -109 Removing image of a specifically branded product
Diff · History 0 Formatting
Diff · History 20 Adding summary to intro
Diff · History 4 Not every tolerates high doses...
Diff · History 8 Most of the claims are contentious and should be labelled as such
Diff · History -371 Viral diseases, and poisons: If the citation can be found, this statement can go back in.
Diff · History -723 Common cold: Removing violation of WP:NOR and WP:SOAP
Diff · History -618 Advocacy arguments: Genocide? Removing uncited, controversial claim
Diff · History -1,033 Regulation: Corrected uncited section and removed irrelevant citation
Diff · History -117 Regulation: No, health claims are allowed if they pass clinical trial.
Diff · History -765 Universal panacea hypothesis: Removed uncited section
Diff · History 23 Universal panacea hypothesis: fact tagging
Diff · History -586 Potential harmful effects: Removed a complete mis-citation. The link is actually to "When smoke gets in your genes"
Diff · History -110 Potential harmful effects: Removed citation to based upon the "Vitamin C Foundation", violates WP:V and WP:CITE
Diff · History -2,481 Removed completely unsourced section
Diff · History 5 grammar
Diff · History -597 Removed section that was based upon an unsourced statement
Diff · History -317 Removed gross miscitation. Article cited was a chemical association study -- inappropriate to use it as a causal study.
Diff · History -468 Removed section whose sole source violated WP:V
Diff · History 16 Heart disease: Clarifying
Diff · History -333 Common cold: Removing conflicts with WP:NOR
Diff · History 264 Common cold: Changing statements to better reflect the actual sources cited
Diff · History -566 Common cold: Again, removed gross miscitation. Article read: This same panel also cautioned that taking more than 1000mg of vitamin C daily could have adverse effects
Diff · History -108 Common cold: Removed gross mis-citation. Article read "great caution should be exercised in generalizing from this finding, which is based mainly on marathon runners."
Diff · History -710 Removing a section who's only citation violated WP:V (advocacy website)
Diff · History 154 Adding citation
Diff · History -162 Removing sentence more relevant towards lower sections
Diff · History -1,742 Removing sources contrary to WP:V. Rewording as the cited sources are neither extensive nor scientific.
Diff · History -287 Formatting
Diff · History 577 Adding citation
Diff · History 22 Cancer: Moving to more logical format
Diff · History 4 Cancer: grammar
Diff · History 313 Cancer: Adding American Cancer Society Statement
Diff · History 7 grammar
Diff · History 234 Adding more toward potential complications
Diff · History 17 Cancer: Clarifying tumor growth
Diff · History 425 Cancer: Adding more citations
Diff · History 58 Clarifying megadosing side effects
Diff · History 28 "Qualified" is an undefined term
Diff · History 132 Potential harmful effects: Adding citations
All times are in UTC.