Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Scientific method (Log · Page History) |
| User | Cosmic Latte (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 54 |
| Minor edits | 14 (25.9%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 0 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 1,661 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -586 |
Minor edits
·
14 (25.9%)
Major edits
·
40 (74.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
54 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
54 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-09-22 16:14 | Diff · History | 3 | →Confirmation: word choice |
| 2010-09-22 16:11 | Diff · History | 28 | →Confirmation: and what we mean by "NSF" is, of course... Ninja Strike Force! |
| 2010-09-22 16:08 | Diff · History | 16 | →Confirmation: ce |
| 2010-09-22 16:03 | Diff · History | -1 | →Experiments: rm redirect |
| 2010-09-22 16:00 | Diff · History | 0 | ce |
| 2010-09-22 15:11 | Diff · History | 42 | →DNA example: ce; wikilink |
| 2010-09-21 17:59 | Diff · History | -71 | on the other hand, deliberately seeing if one's own results can be falsified sounds like intellectual honesty. but, uh, I get it now. this is the _other_ meaning of "falsify" |
| 2010-09-21 17:49 | Diff · History | -36 | →Data sharing: rm cuteness |
| 2010-09-21 17:48 | Diff · History | 70 | →Documentation and replication: cmt |
| 2010-09-21 17:46 | Diff · History | -11 | →Peer review evaluation: parallelism and repetition |
| 2010-09-21 17:45 | Diff · History | 26 | →Peer review evaluation: "crackpot".. now there's an encyclopedic word for ya |
| 2010-09-21 17:42 | Diff · History | -6 | →Communication, community, culture: nice alliteration, but the first two words get the point across just fine. and they, at least, are etymological cousins |
| 2010-09-21 17:39 | Diff · History | -4 | →Pragmatic model: aha--_here's_ where the article (finally) gets down to "truth".. but the templated link seems to warrant Template:Main, I'd think |
| 2010-09-21 17:33 | Diff · History | -28 | →Introduction to scientific method: rm bizarre pipelink |
| 2010-09-21 17:32 | Diff · History | -18 | →Introduction to scientific method: rm internal cross-reference; fix link |
| 2010-09-21 17:30 | Diff · History | 2 | →Introduction to scientific method: missed one |
| 2010-09-21 17:29 | Diff · History | -68 | →Introduction to scientific method: does all of this "we-we" amount to a Freudian slip? hehe. also rm internal cross-reference |
| 2010-09-21 17:25 | Diff · History | 1 | →Introduction to scientific method: ce; fix mile-long wikilink |
| 2010-09-21 17:21 | Diff · History | -23 | tighten |
| 2010-09-21 17:20 | Diff · History | -8 | more overlinking |
| 2010-09-21 17:18 | Diff · History | 6 | "this" what? |
| 2010-09-21 17:15 | Diff · History | 4 | methodology is the study of method. so, a "methodology of knowledge" would be a "study of method of knowledge"... or something |
| 2010-09-21 17:11 | Diff · History | -49 | rm verbiage |
| 2010-09-21 17:08 | Diff · History | 15 | avoid later contradiction |
| 2010-09-21 17:07 | Diff · History | 0 | split infinitive |
| 2010-09-21 14:26 | Diff · History | 499 | →Observation and belief: flip-flop subsections; add transition paragraph ("A pristine science...") |
| 2010-09-21 14:05 | Diff · History | 79 | →Certainty and myth: actually, passage probably belongs in the article, but perhaps not in this subsection |
| 2010-09-21 14:01 | Diff · History | 18 | →Certainty and myth: wut? maybe this has got something to do with parsimony; but I haven't read the source, so I dunno |
| 2010-09-21 13:58 | Diff · History | 3 | →Certainty and myth: the ghost of the "climb" metaphor comes back to haunt us |
| 2010-09-21 13:56 | Diff · History | 100 | →Beliefs and biases: honestly, though, I don't completely get it... |
| 2010-09-21 13:53 | Diff · History | -42 | →Beliefs and biases: already noted |
| 2010-09-21 13:50 | Diff · History | 15 | →Beliefs and biases: tweak |
| 2010-09-21 13:49 | Diff · History | 11 | →Beliefs and biases: ce |
| 2010-09-21 13:42 | Diff · History | 0 | →Certainty and myth: rm contradiction (falsified/verified) |
| 2010-09-21 13:41 | Diff · History | -37 | →Certainty and myth: a "climb"? like, upwards and onwards?! rm scary metaphor. ("leap" could be an allusion to leap of faith, but even then the metaphor is debatable) |
| 2010-09-21 13:30 | Diff · History | 6 | →Beliefs and biases: "this" what? |
| 2010-09-21 13:29 | Diff · History | 5 | →Beliefs and biases: I think a word was missing here? |
| 2010-09-21 13:28 | Diff · History | -12 | →Beliefs and biases: ...and the other half of the preceding edit |
| 2010-09-21 13:26 | Diff · History | 112 | →Beliefs and biases: what does falsification have to do with cognitive biases (except for a negative "ring" to complement the affirmative "ring" of "confirmation", as in "confirmation bias")? |
| 2010-09-21 13:06 | Diff · History | 1 | →Beliefs and biases: ce |
| 2010-09-21 13:06 | Diff · History | 42 | →Beliefs and biases: ce |
| 2010-09-21 13:03 | Diff · History | -18 | →Certainty and myth: already linked just a couple paras earlier |
| 2010-09-21 13:02 | Diff · History | 23 | →Certainty and myth: further reduce redundancy |
| 2010-09-21 12:40 | Diff · History | 120 | →Certainty and myth: cmt out line w/ explanation |
| 2010-09-21 12:36 | Diff · History | 57 | →Certainty and myth: attempt to fix grand oversimplification; rm redundancy (i.e., "the obviously false is shown to be false") |
| 2010-09-21 12:28 | Diff · History | 330 | →Certainty and myth: wording is a tad too strong. tone down phrasing and add a couple hidden comments |
| 2010-09-21 12:13 | Diff · History | 2 | →Certainty and myth: tone |
| 2010-09-21 12:11 | Diff · History | -62 | →Certainty and myth: this out-of-the-blue comparison probably will cause more confusion than clarification for most readers |
| 2010-09-21 12:09 | Diff · History | -9 | →Truth and belief: I don't see where this section actually takes upon itself the monumental task of illuminating "the truth" |
| 2010-09-21 12:02 | Diff · History | 16 | →Certainty and myth: ever observed or experienced a theory? .....no, a "scientific theory" is not, in and of itself, "empirical" |
| 2010-09-21 11:55 | Diff · History | -54 | →Philosophy and sociology of science: one link is enough.. |
| 2010-09-21 10:36 | Diff · History | 9 | →Certainty and myth: rm truism (essentially, "narratives that exist are more appealing than those that don't") |
| 2010-09-21 10:25 | Diff · History | -25 | fix more overlinking |
| 2010-09-21 10:19 | Diff · History | -4 | quantum physics? good example of why it can help to check links out before actually adding them... |
All times are in UTC.