Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Oppenheimer (film) (Log · Page History) |
| User | Coolcaesar (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 92 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (1.1%) |
| Reverted edits | 2 (2.2%) |
| atbe1 | 7.5 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 12,886 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -2,221 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
92 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (1.1%)
Manual edits
·
91 (98.9%)
Reverted edits
·
2 (2.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
90 (97.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-15 08:48 | Diff · History | 39 | Copyediting this into American English rather than British English. This is an American film by an American studio about an American topic, even though the current head of the studio and the director of this film are both British expatriates and the lead role was played by an Irish actor. |
| 2024-12-18 16:13 | Diff · History | 19 | Undid revision 1263711056 by MasterEditor8819 (talk) Revert undiscussed deletion. Take it to the talk page, please. The film is clearly in that category. |
| 2024-11-05 19:32 | Diff · History | 259 | Undid revision 1255508823 by 2601:2C1:C802:E93E:9415:804A:B798:2523 (talk) Revert disruptive edit after failure to engage in constructive discussion to develop new consensus. See WP:ONUS. Please discuss on talk page. |
| 2024-10-19 16:18 | Diff · History | 259 | →Plot: Again revert disruptive edits to article back to longstanding consensus version. See talk page discussion. The proponent of those edits has not sustained their burden to persuasively explain why the longstanding consensus version should be modified. See WP:ONUS. |
| 2024-10-11 20:47 | Diff · History | 250 | (reverted) →Plot: Again revert back plot summary to longstanding consensus version. The new version is severely flawed because it focuses on way too many irrelevant tangents and minimizes key plot points. See lengthy discussion on talk page. Under WP core policies, the editor disrupting the longstanding consensus version of an article has the burden of proof. |
| 2024-10-04 04:42 | Diff · History | 328 | (reverted) →Plot: Revert disruptive editing by 2601:2c1:c801:473d:dc69:1959:4e0:2e04 on 28 September 2024 which (1) disrupted the longstanding consensus version of this section without any warning; (2) violated WP:FILMPLOT (too long, too much information, too much detail; (3) incorrectly summarized various aspects of the plot; and (4) introduced at least one obvious spelling error and three serious grammar errors. |
| 2024-07-23 19:51 | Diff · History | 65 | →Accuracy and omissions: Removing inappropriate use of "whereas." I'm a lawyer. We use that term all the time. Clarifying the key point that is being made here. |
| 2024-06-25 17:40 | Diff · History | 66 | →Filming: Clarifying this |
| 2024-06-25 17:36 | Diff · History | 1,651 | →Filming: Expanding on this |
| 2024-06-25 17:18 | Diff · History | 1,087 | →Filming: Adding another key detail |
| 2024-06-25 17:12 | Diff · History | 843 | →Filming: Clarifying this, adding direct citation to book |
| 2024-05-07 15:40 | Diff · History | 510 | →Critical response: Adding another key point |
| 2024-04-02 14:36 | Diff · History | 4 | →Accuracy and omissions: Fixing obvious run-on sentence. |
| 2024-04-02 14:35 | Diff · History | 23 | →Accuracy and omissions: Adding link |
| 2024-03-19 13:02 | Diff · History | 62 | →Plot: Testimony is a mass noun. It doesn't take an article. Fixing other grammar issues. |
| 2024-02-28 15:33 | Diff · History | 3 | →Plot: Correcting more obvious errors. None of this has been introduced at this point in the article. |
| 2024-02-28 15:31 | Diff · History | -107 | →Plot: Reverting last paragraph back to last good version. "Consumed by the aforementioned chain reaction" sloppily conflates cause (the nuclear arms race) with effect (nuclear holocaust). Oppenheimer's vision depicts the latter. |
| 2024-02-28 15:27 | Diff · History | 5 | →Plot: Removing usage of terms of art used only in certain corners of mathematics in a narrative summary about a non-mathematics topic |
| 2024-02-18 18:05 | Diff · History | 4 | →Plot: Restoring link to arcane legal concept which is clearly not commonly understood. (I'm an attorney. We deal with testimony all the time.) This grammatical error keeps reoccurring. |
| 2024-02-18 18:02 | Diff · History | -14 | →Plot: Revert edit by User:Drumerwriter on 13 February 2024 which introduced multiple grammar errors. As any competent lawyer will tell you, testimony is a mass noun. See the source by Bryan A. Garner cited and linked to in that article. |
| 2024-02-05 02:53 | Diff · History | 5 | →Plot: Revising this to more closely follow the actual wording: "I believe we did." |
| 2024-02-03 19:02 | Diff · History | 234 | →Accuracy and omissions: Adding another key point |
| 2024-01-13 21:44 | Diff · History | 4 | →Plot: Fixing obvious grammar error introduced by User:Dcdiehardfan on 11 January 2024. Testimony is a mass noun (and always has been). See discussion on talk page proposing mass revert to eliminate additional errors. |
| 2024-01-01 20:51 | Diff · History | 9 | →Plot: Fixing this further |
| 2024-01-01 20:49 | Diff · History | 17 | →Accuracy and omissions: Fixing more grammar errors |
| 2024-01-01 20:48 | Diff · History | 14 | →Accuracy and omissions: Fixing more grammar errors |
| 2024-01-01 20:45 | Diff · History | 31 | →Plot: Counter edit which introduced grammatical error and is also a flatly incorrect statement of that plot point |
| 2024-01-01 20:43 | Diff · History | 41 | →Filming: Counter copyedit on 30 December 2023 which did not precisely track contents of cited source |
| 2023-12-03 20:55 | Diff · History | 23 | →Development: Correcting dialect. See MOS:TIES. |
| 2023-11-12 12:35 | Diff · History | 583 | →Production: Expanding on this point, adding source |
| 2023-11-10 21:35 | Diff · History | -667 | →Accuracy and omissions: See discussion on talk page. Reverting second violation of WP:NOR. Wikipedia is not a first publisher of original research. The cited source does not mention the film Oppenheimer and it does not claim that the film fails to mention or portray William Jacob Knox Jr. It is also a violation of WP:V to cite a source for an assertion it does not make. |
| 2023-10-31 14:38 | Diff · History | -2 | →Accuracy and omissions: Fixing obvious typo |
| 2023-10-31 14:37 | Diff · History | -765 | →Accuracy and omissions: Failed verification. Removing original research in violation of WP:NOR. The cited source does not state that this scientist was omitted from the film. Under NOR, Wikipedia cannot be the first publisher of original research. |
| 2023-10-22 22:18 | Diff · History | -126 | →Accuracy and omissions: Removing unsourced statement. See WP:NOR. |
| 2023-10-22 12:49 | Diff · History | 991 | →Filming: Adding more info and citation |
| 2023-09-25 02:49 | Diff · History | -41 | Fixing punctuation per MOS:TIES and MOS:US. Fixing excessive overlinking. |
| 2023-09-17 18:39 | Diff · History | -12 | →Filming: Further copyediting |
| 2023-09-17 18:37 | Diff · History | 37 | →Cast: Robb was in private practice at the time of the hearing. |
| 2023-09-16 15:45 | Diff · History | -31 | →Historical accuracy: Shortening this |
| 2023-09-10 04:59 | Diff · History | 5 | →Historical accuracy: "Palpable" is an adjective, not a verb. |
| 2023-09-07 12:24 | Diff · History | 441 | →Historical accuracy: Adding source |
| 2023-09-06 06:11 | Diff · History | 67 | Undid revision 1173990761 by PencilSticks0823 (talk) Revert improper deletion of grammatically correct sentence. That's not a run-on sentence, because it doesn't mash together multiple independent clauses. |
| 2023-09-06 06:09 | Diff · History | 2 | →Plot: Correcting clear punctuation error. The correct spelling in formal written American English is U.S., even when other three and four-letter abbreviations don't use periods. |
| 2023-09-04 23:23 | Diff · History | 113 | →Plot: Correcting another grammar error inserted by User:PencilSticks0823 on 3 and 4 September 2023. Testimony is a mass noun in American English. See the source cited in the article on testimony (which I added). |
| 2023-09-02 16:13 | Diff · History | -12 | →Post-production: Removing another inappropriate use of "had." |
| 2023-08-31 16:57 | Diff · History | 142 | →Plot: Reinserting key plot points. Also, Strauss is singular, so the possessive 's has to be used. |
| 2023-08-31 16:32 | Diff · History | 31 | →Critical response: LA Times has changed the article title |
| 2023-08-30 08:14 | Diff · History | 22 | →Filming: Clarifying this |
| 2023-08-30 08:13 | Diff · History | 3 | →Filming: Fixing this |
| 2023-08-30 08:04 | Diff · History | 987 | →Filming: Adding more information |
| 2023-08-27 01:42 | Diff · History | 260 | →Historical accuracy: Adding another key point |
| 2023-08-23 14:43 | Diff · History | 733 | →Critical response: Adding another key point |
| 2023-08-20 14:49 | Diff · History | 386 | →Casting: Adding another key point, removing date which appears to be incorrect (because the script wasn't written until a year later) |
| 2023-08-15 16:09 | Diff · History | 2 | →Plot: Change to American English. See [MOS:TIES. The correct idiom in American English is to "share with," not "share to." |
| 2023-08-08 07:26 | Diff · History | 6 | →Filming: Moving down two sentences so this makes more sense |
| 2023-08-03 14:35 | Diff · History | 106 | →Filming: Clarifying this |
| 2023-08-03 14:33 | Diff · History | 35 | →Filming: Clarifying this |
| 2023-08-03 14:28 | Diff · History | 162 | →Filming: Moving up further |
| 2023-08-03 14:24 | Diff · History | 241 | →Filming: Expanding on this point |
| 2023-08-03 14:16 | Diff · History | 397 | Adding another key point |
| 2023-08-01 16:27 | Diff · History | 29 | →Casting: Fixing this further |
| 2023-08-01 16:26 | Diff · History | 36 | →Casting: Fixing this mess. The Downey quote should be moved up. |
| 2023-08-01 16:24 | Diff · History | -29 | →Writing: Deleting a rather obvious factual error. The AEC didn't come into being until after the Manhattan Project. |
| 2023-08-01 15:51 | Diff · History | 0 | →Plot: That's a bit too informal. |
| 2023-08-01 15:30 | Diff · History | 11 | →Filming: Fixing this |
| 2023-08-01 15:29 | Diff · History | 830 | →Filming: Clarifying key point |
| 2023-08-01 15:14 | Diff · History | 70 | →Casting: Clarifying this |
| 2023-08-01 15:12 | Diff · History | -1 | →Casting: Removing excessive use of "had" and reinserting one which I had incorrectly taken out. |
| 2023-08-01 15:05 | Diff · History | -21 | →Filming: Copyediting this. |
| 2023-08-01 15:00 | Diff · History | -18 | →Writing: Copyediting this. Again, excessive use of "had". See talk page. |
| 2023-08-01 14:54 | Diff · History | -282 | →Development: Removing excessive use of "had" as noted on talk page. Fixing sequence of citations. |
| 2023-08-01 14:50 | Diff · History | -6 | →Development: Revising to track text of article more closely |
| 2023-08-01 14:48 | Diff · History | 173 | →Development: Clarifying this. As the cited source indicates, the film rights were merely optioned. |
| 2023-08-01 14:23 | Diff · History | 90 | →Plot: Copyediting further. |
| 2023-07-31 00:15 | Diff · History | 83 | →Filming: Fixing more bad grammar |
| 2023-07-30 22:00 | Diff · History | -67 | →Plot: Removing redundant language |
| 2023-07-30 21:57 | Diff · History | 35 | →Filming: Fixing this |
| 2023-07-30 21:51 | Diff · History | 13 | →Plot: Fixing this further |
| 2023-07-30 21:48 | Diff · History | -8 | →Plot: Shortening this |
| 2023-07-30 21:43 | Diff · History | 30 | →Plot: Clarifying further |
| 2023-07-30 21:39 | Diff · History | 93 | →Plot: Clarifying this |
| 2023-07-30 21:34 | Diff · History | -5 | →Plot: Pulling this out |
| 2023-07-30 21:34 | Diff · History | 155 | →Plot: Following up on this point |
| 2023-07-30 21:20 | Diff · History | -3 | →Plot: Clarifying this |
| 2023-07-30 21:16 | Diff · History | 44 | →Plot: Clarifying what this means |
| 2023-07-30 21:15 | Diff · History | 44 | →Plot: Revising this to American English per MOS:TIES. This is an American film about an American physicist who directed the construction of the atomic bomb for the American federal government. Correcting the plot summary. Hill was with Fermi in Chicago at the time (as shown in the film) and only later moved to Los Alamos. |
| 2023-07-24 02:47 | Diff · History | 33 | →Plot: That style of chaining clauses is legal in several other languages, but it's a run-on sentence in English. |
| 2023-07-22 17:12 | Diff · History | 4 | →Plot: Further revising this |
| 2023-07-22 17:06 | Diff · History | 65 | →Plot: Copyediting this mess |
| 2023-07-22 16:59 | Diff · History | 1 | Fix good faith edit by User:Jal11497 on 22 July 2023. Testimony is a mass noun in American English. This is an American film, filmed in the United States with a predominantly American cast and financed and released by an American studio. See MOS:TIES. |
| 2023-07-14 14:11 | Diff · History | -4 | →Marketing: "Debuted" doesn't take a "was" in that context. |
| 2023-02-27 05:38 | Diff · History | 18 | →Filming: Fixing link |
All times are in UTC.