Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Colin • Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates (Log · Page History)
User Colin (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 87
Minor edits 2 (2.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 68.7
Added (bytes)2 83,727
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 2 (2.3%)
Major edits · 85 (97.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 87 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 87 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2023-05-15 16:41 Diff · History 1,856 →Script to highlight reading difficulty: Reply
2023-05-15 15:33 Diff · History 649 →Script to highlight reading difficulty: Reply
2023-05-15 14:55 Diff · History 1,237 →Script to highlight reading difficulty: Reply
2021-10-27 15:49 Diff · History 1,093 →The role of FAC co-ordinator: re
2021-10-27 14:17 Diff · History 649 →The role of FAC co-ordinator: cmt
2021-10-25 20:12 Diff · History 400 →Potential new coordinators: re
2021-10-25 12:59 Diff · History 714 →Potential new coordinators: re Graham
2021-10-25 10:25 Diff · History 883 →Potential new coordinators: cmt
2012-05-09 09:14 Diff · History 991 →Moving Forward: ??
2012-05-07 16:16 Diff · History 1,239 →Ketogenic diet: reply to Sandy/Tony
2012-05-06 20:58 Diff · History 1,208 →SME review form: my 2p
2012-05-06 20:41 Diff · History 3,485 →Subject matter experts and reviews: Ketogenic diet
2012-05-04 21:34 Diff · History 1,141 →Subject matter experts and reviews: brief point
2012-05-03 09:39 Diff · History 2,143 →Wikipedia's brave new world: volunteers as the guardians of values in a binary system: some thoughts
2012-01-13 09:40 Diff · History 1,104 →Straw poll: What should be the target takt for FAC?: is this desirable?
2012-01-12 09:33 Diff · History 1,822 →Essay on FAC from a statistical process control perspective: comment
2012-01-06 22:48 Diff · History 651 →Bottom line straw poll on electing a Director, keep discussion above please: elections
2011-07-22 15:58 Diff · History 308 →More options: Eubilides
2011-02-16 08:21 Diff · History 481 →Guideline: Make technical articles understandable: could someone with common sense please help here.
2011-02-15 10:34 Diff · History 502 →It's all about love: guideline restored
2011-02-15 08:36 Diff · History 1,910 →It's all about love: doesn't happen
2011-02-14 21:22 Diff · History 1,669 →How FA influences WP: sacred cows
2011-02-14 19:40 Diff · History 1,938 →How FA influences WP: agree: not everything can be an FA
2011-02-14 12:41 Diff · History 2,090 →How FA influences WP: that soundbite is a lie
2011-02-14 12:14 Diff · History 905 →How FA influences WP: reply
2011-02-13 19:15 Diff · History 1,288 →How FA influences WP: on starting or restoring a guideline on WP's audience
2011-02-13 15:48 Diff · History 486 →How FA influences WP: further: this article is not the catalyst for this discussion, it has been brewing elsewhere...
2011-02-13 15:39 Diff · History 1,170 →How FA influences WP: the issue is WP:NOT, not the actual wording of any given article
2011-02-13 11:41 Diff · History 1,545 →How FA influences WP: reply
2011-02-13 10:07 Diff · History 5,003 →Some thoughts from an FA-newbie: why this is important
2011-02-12 17:46 Diff · History 517 →Some thoughts from an FA-newbie: editorial restraint is not just a matter of trees
2011-02-12 16:29 Diff · History 1,134 →Some thoughts from an FA-newbie: opinions
2011-02-12 14:16 Diff · History 1,189 →Some thoughts from an FA-newbie: reply to EdChem
2011-02-12 11:01 Diff · History 1,221 →Some thoughts from an FA-newbie: thoughts on readership
2010-11-01 21:20 Diff · History 686 →Supplying too many refs: agree it is bad, but why do we need more rules at FAC
2010-10-12 16:40 Diff · History 289 →Sources reviewing: concern
2010-06-23 11:00 Diff · History 1,003 →Alt text (yet again): please help
2010-04-16 18:09 Diff · History 435 →External peer review: Medicine and Google.org announcement
2010-04-15 18:47 Diff · History 1,702 →Journal article labels FAC a failure: comment
2010-03-16 00:22 Diff · History 326 →WP:ALT under discussion: I guess I'm mistaken.
2010-03-15 21:47 Diff · History 126 →WP:ALT under discussion: *sigh*
2010-03-15 21:24 Diff · History 705 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: WP:ALT is now "under discussion"
2010-03-15 19:22 Diff · History 385 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: moaning in the wrong place
2010-03-15 17:58 Diff · History 566 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: re colour
2010-03-15 14:06 Diff · History 297 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: I like my red herrings half-baked with a drizzle of lemon juice
2010-03-15 13:51 Diff · History 752 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: argument doesn't hold, otherwise we'd be knee deep in WP:V arguments
2010-03-15 13:13 Diff · History 910 →This issue needs to be sorted, and quickly: please take this to WT:ALT. how many times must this be repeated?
2010-03-12 19:37 Diff · History 252 →Alt text back to the basics: right, I really must go and do something else....
2010-03-12 19:22 Diff · History 917 →Alt text back to the basics: had to peek
2010-03-12 14:23 Diff · History 1,293 →Alt text back to the basics: sad
2010-03-12 14:08 Diff · History 6 →Alt text back to the basics: not sure who charles is immediately replying to but his comments came after mine so double indent to make it clear I'm responding to Dahn
2010-03-12 13:43 Diff · History 1,874 →Alt text back to the basics: re captions and the plot example
2010-03-12 09:21 Diff · History 640 →Alt text back to the basics: reply to Dahn
2010-03-12 08:39 Diff · History 1,106 →Alt text back to the basics: good grief
2010-03-11 21:04 Diff · History 811 →Alt text back to the basics: have a look at our FA plot summaries
2010-03-11 20:25 Diff · History 149 →Alt text back to the basics: re picking it apart
2010-03-11 19:50 Diff · History 582 →Alt text back to the basics: alt-text & plot summary -- why one not the other?
2010-03-11 18:01 Diff · History 757 →Alt text back to the basics: query OR claim
2010-03-09 13:20 Diff · History 660 →Alt text in FA images: reply
2010-03-09 11:18 Diff · History 300 →Alt text in FA images: the FA criteria are discussed at WT:FA?
2010-03-09 11:01 Diff · History 527 →Alt text in FA images: keep this relevant. The guideline doesn't "recommend", it mandates (in as much as any guideline can)
2010-03-09 09:20 Diff · History 246 →Alt text in FA images: take this to WT:ALT
2009-12-10 20:22 Diff · History 369 →Tiny images significantly compromising FACs: "our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of ... presentation"
2009-12-10 19:57 Diff · History 619 →Tiny images significantly compromising FACs: images are different
2009-06-26 08:14 Diff · History 620 →Alt text in images: support
2009-04-06 17:15 Diff · History 571 →Guild of Copy editors: my 2p
2009-04-05 17:47 Diff · History 413 →Reviewing FACs can be a thankless task: re "helpful attitude"
2009-04-05 16:56 Diff · History 421 →Reviewing FACs can be a thankless task: preparation
2008-05-17 11:29 Diff · History 1,947 →Featured list to featured article: re Jimfbleak
2008-05-16 18:55 Diff · History 977 →Featured list to featured article: re Dulcem
2008-05-15 21:06 Diff · History 771 →Featured list to featured article: re
2008-02-13 08:09 Diff · History 359 →List articles as FA versus FL again: clarify
2008-02-12 19:53 Diff · History 712 →List articles as FA versus FL again: re episode lists
2008-02-12 09:43 Diff · History 1,597 →List articles as FA versus FL again: several responses
2008-02-11 22:23 Diff · History 1,024 →List articles as FA versus FL again: response and suggested rule
2008-02-11 19:57 Diff · History 721 →List articles as FA versus FL again: re
2007-12-30 16:24 Diff · History 1,417 →Request for Comment: Vote-stacking: FLC thoughts
2007-12-24 18:53 Diff · History 549 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: re
2007-12-24 17:28 Diff · History 438 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: move it
2007-12-24 17:22 Diff · History 518 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: FLC is quite capable of reviewing "Neutrality and accuracy"
2007-12-21 18:10 Diff · History 328 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: do we have consensus
2007-12-21 17:42 Diff · History 1,530 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: suggest Monahan moved to FLC ASAP. Others may be controversial.
2007-12-20 19:16 Diff · History 0 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: typo
2007-12-20 19:08 Diff · History 1,923 →List articles as featured articles versus featured lists: comment
2007-08-01 12:57 Diff · History 1,800 →Intention to add anti-chaos requirements to the instructions: comment
2007-07-20 08:15 Diff · History 809 →What can be done when an "Oppose" asks for copyediting by someone unfamiliar with the article?: yes, copyediting takes a long time
2007-01-04 12:02 Diff · History 371 Help on Featured list candidates
All times are in UTC.