Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back ColinTalk:Cass Review • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Talk:Cass Review (Log · Page History)
User Colin (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 181
Minor edits 8 (4.4%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 1 (0.6%)
atbe1 0.9
Added (bytes)2 215,769
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 8 (4.4%)
Major edits · 173 (95.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 181 (100%)
Reverted edits · 1 (0.6%)
Unreverted edits · 180 (99.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 866 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 260 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 282 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 1,217 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 2,300 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 1,735 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 5,389 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 1,042 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 3,410 Downplaying facts: Reply
Diff · History 2,103 Rephrasing BMA's initial paragraph: Reply
Diff · History 1,617 Rephrasing BMA's initial paragraph: coatrack?
Diff · History 1,199 Rephrasing BMA's initial paragraph: cmt
Diff · History 1,510 Rephrasing BMA's initial paragraph: cmt
Diff · History 1,282 Scotland: new section
Diff · History 813 BMA (percentage): Reply
Diff · History 1,489 BMA (percentage): Reply
Diff · History 1,115 Rephrasing BMA's initial paragraph: re Retal
Diff · History 2,135 BMA (percentage): cmt
Diff · History 802 BMA (percentage): cmt
Diff · History 956 The list of Recommendations is very very long, and lacks meaningful groupings: Reply
Diff · History 1,968 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 3,516 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 854 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 11 Consider the other side: add
Diff · History 1 Consider the other side: which
Diff · History 3,931 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 649 Consider the other side: add
Diff · History 218 Consider the other side: link
Diff · History 490 BMA Council response: Reply
Diff · History 667 BMA Council response: Reply
Diff · History 55 Consider the other side: add Snokalok's comment about atire
Diff · History 684 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 1,019 Consider the other side: Reply
Diff · History 1,760 BMA Council response: Reply
Diff · History 4,021 BMA Council response: Consider the other side
Diff · History 227 BMA Council response: Reply
Diff · History 732 BMA Council response: re Snokalok
Diff · History 1,502 BMA Council response: Reply
Diff · History 346 BMA Council response: add
Diff · History 0 BMA Council response: sentence in wrong place
Diff · History 2,209 BMA Council response: new section
Diff · History 659 Yale integrity project: Reply
Diff · History 2,083 Due weight: Reply
Diff · History 5,030 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 394 Peerage: Reply
Diff · History -418 (reverted)  rv comment by VintageVernacular. Probably BLP violation. If they are wrong, say what they got wrong and give evidence.
Diff · History 684 Peerage: Reply
Diff · History 1,336 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,099 Background: re Snokalok
Diff · History 1,596 Expand lede: Reply
Diff · History 1,091 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 310 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,581 Background: Reply
Diff · History 1,703 Background: Reply
Diff · History 191 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 1,325 Yale integrity project: Reply
Diff · History 1,171 Yale integrity project: Reply
Diff · History 2,672 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 957 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 671 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 2,105 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 437 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 18 Several international medical orgs: sp
Diff · History 162 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 2,123 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 1,143 Several international medical orgs: Reply
Diff · History 1,973 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 1,520 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 451 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 820 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 651 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 308 report to consider: clarify
Diff · History 914 report to consider: Reply
Diff · History 978 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 964 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1 Critical papers: ,
Diff · History 1,330 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 749 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,538 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,967 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,575 Critical papers: cmt
Diff · History 764 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 399 Critical papers: Reply
Diff · History 1,556 When referring to pre-pubescent females - is 'women' better than 'females?: Reply
Diff · History 184 widespread, false claims from critics of the report that it had dismissed 98% of the studies: Reply
Diff · History 1,208 widespread, false claims from critics of the report that it had dismissed 98% of the studies: Reply
Diff · History 804 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 262 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 691 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 2,337 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 2,671 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 2 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: fix indent to make it clear this is all Snokalok's comment
Diff · History 998 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 2,611 The view that "Cass is not a reliable RS on biomedical facts and claims": a snapshot of the For and Against from Talk so far: Reply
Diff · History 1,531 Refactoring the Reception -> Final report subsection: Reply
Diff · History 3,093 Refactoring the Reception -> Final report subsection: cmt
Diff · History 1,097 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 2,207 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 2,932 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 916 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 581 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 1,162 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 426 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 269 GenderGP Response: Reply
Diff · History 1,061 Cass q&a: add
Diff · History 2,892 Cass q&a: Reply to Loki
Diff · History 1,452 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 181 We should remove several responses to the report: Reply
Diff · History 0 Cass q&a: audio
Diff · History 1,242 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 2,508 Mostly news articles?: Reply
Diff · History 519 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 298 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 1,490 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 1,119 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 589 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 870 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 533 Mostly news articles?: Reply
Diff · History 44 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: add
Diff · History 7 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: fix
Diff · History 886 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 2,098 Social transition: new section
Diff · History 1,435 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 4,591 NPOV, MOS:CLAIM, and BLP oh my!: Reply
Diff · History 572 Cass q&a: Reply
Diff · History 2,787 More International Responses: Reply
Diff · History 924 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 2,598 More International Responses: Reply
Diff · History 1,025 Recommendations: Reply
Diff · History 720 Report used AI generated images of children: Reply
Diff · History 244 Report used AI generated images of children: Reply
Diff · History 332 Recommendations: Reply
Diff · History 717 Mostly news articles?: Reply
Diff · History 3,631 Condensing the individual responses: Reply
Diff · History 2,915 Condensing the individual responses: Reply
Diff · History 1,039 Kamran Abassi: Reply
Diff · History 362 Don't use sources by The Telegraph and The Times: suggest close
Diff · History 1,429 Proposal: Reply
Diff · History 153 Don't use sources by The Telegraph and The Times: Reply
Diff · History 351 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 664 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 679 Don't use sources by The Telegraph and The Times: Reply
Diff · History 1,087 Proposal: Reply
Diff · History 447 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 813 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 991 Proposal: cmt
Diff · History 1,332 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 1,286 Proposal: Reply
Diff · History 769 Proposal: Reply
Diff · History 1,361 Separating 'Reception' into public and scientific responses?: Reply
Diff · History 1,410 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 2,241 Proposal: cmt
Diff · History 1,054 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 1,219 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 0 Cal Horton: typo
Diff · History 1,095 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 351 TransActual analysis of the Cass Review: Reply
Diff · History 2,113 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 511 Cal Horton: Reply
Diff · History 3,180 Request for review of a sentence: Reply
Diff · History 603 Request for review of a sentence: Reply
Diff · History 2,492 Cal Horton: new section
Diff · History 1,232 Request for review of a sentence: cmt
Diff · History 0 Criticism: y
Diff · History 1,382 Criticism: Reply
Diff · History 568 The Cass Review vs the Systematic Reviews: Reply
Diff · History 547 The Cass Review vs the Systematic Reviews: Reply
Diff · History 1,656 Criticism: Reply
Diff · History 861 The Cass Review vs the Systematic Reviews: new section
Diff · History 1,186 Criticism: delete Horton's opinion section
Diff · History 1 Exploratory: Council of Europe
Diff · History 1,559 Exploratory: Reply
Diff · History 1,391 Exploratory: Reply
Diff · History 258 Exploratory: Reply
Diff · History 718 Exploratory: Reply
Diff · History 253 Title: Reply
Diff · History 307 Title: add
Diff · History 650 Title: Reply
Diff · History 231 Title: Reply
Diff · History 1,005 Exploratory: new section
Diff · History 1,289 title
All times are in UTC.