Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking (Log · Page History) |
| User | Ckatz (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 167 |
| Minor edits | 5 (3%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 1 (0.6%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (0.6%) |
| atbe1 | 9 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 283,408 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -1,858 |
Minor edits
·
5 (3%)
Major edits
·
162 (97%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (0.6%)
Manual edits
·
166 (99.4%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (0.6%)
Unreverted edits
·
166 (99.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-10-25 08:24 | Diff · History | 306 | →Discussion: r |
| 2012-05-21 21:11 | Diff · History | 407 | →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): comment |
| 2012-05-18 23:46 | Diff · History | 660 | →Major geographic regions: r.to OC |
| 2012-05-18 16:56 | Diff · History | 598 | →Major geographic regions: comment |
| 2012-05-18 16:50 | Diff · History | 771 | →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): comment to Masem |
| 2012-04-25 16:38 | Diff · History | 1,730 | →Linking sense: reply |
| 2012-04-24 21:43 | Diff · History | 795 | →Linking sense: comment |
| 2011-10-31 07:47 | Diff · History | 497 | →RfC: Can links be repeated after Lead section?: support |
| 2011-02-08 06:31 | Diff · History | 309 | →Geographic terms: r. |
| 2011-02-08 01:00 | Diff · History | 567 | →Geographic terms: r. to GFH |
| 2011-02-07 23:41 | Diff · History | 7 | →Geographic terms: rework |
| 2011-02-07 23:25 | Diff · History | 558 | →Geographic terms: reply |
| 2011-02-02 19:59 | Diff · History | 517 | →Geographic terms: link both |
| 2011-01-02 06:26 | Diff · History | -27 | (reverted) rv hide |
| 2011-01-02 01:28 | Diff · History | 893 | →Arbitrary break (sect. "Recent change that ..."): r. |
| 2010-12-30 08:22 | Diff · History | 221 | →Arbitrary break: date/sign |
| 2010-12-30 08:19 | Diff · History | -4 | →Arbitrary break: Putting it another way |
| 2010-12-30 07:14 | Diff · History | -4 | →Arbitrary break: spelling, eh? |
| 2010-12-30 07:13 | Diff · History | -147 | →Arbitrary break: and just a bit more |
| 2010-12-30 07:07 | Diff · History | 432 | →Arbitrary break: more to this |
| 2010-12-30 06:30 | Diff · History | 523 | →Arbitrary break: r. to Tony1; I welcome substantial, productive debate with you, but if you have nothing to offer other than misleading, borderline dishonest diversionary tactics, there is little point |
| 2010-12-30 03:56 | Diff · History | 830 | →Arbitrary break: r. to Tony1 |
| 2010-12-29 11:23 | Diff · History | 842 | →Arbitrary break: q to OC |
| 2010-12-29 08:58 | Diff · History | 571 | →Arbitrary break: r. to Tony1 |
| 2010-12-29 05:36 | Diff · History | 743 | →Arbitrary break: q. to Tony1 |
| 2010-12-29 05:30 | Diff · History | 260 | →Arbitrary break: rework |
| 2010-12-29 05:28 | Diff · History | 704 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: r.; moving arb. break to include current discussion |
| 2010-12-29 03:51 | Diff · History | 178 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: tweak (EC) |
| 2010-12-29 03:42 | Diff · History | 28 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: note |
| 2010-12-29 03:28 | Diff · History | 611 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: r. |
| 2010-12-27 22:56 | Diff · History | 520 | →Arbitrary break: r. to GF |
| 2010-12-27 19:10 | Diff · History | 422 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: r. |
| 2010-12-26 22:26 | Diff · History | 463 | →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: note |
| 2010-12-24 11:57 | Diff · History | 484 | →Parent–child links: r. to Tony1 |
| 2010-12-24 04:52 | Diff · History | 668 | →Parent–child links: comment |
| 2010-12-15 04:34 | Diff · History | 520 | →Parent–child links: r. to OCC; you said "intimidate", not me |
| 2010-12-14 22:35 | Diff · History | 33 | →Parent–child links: rewword |
| 2010-12-14 22:30 | Diff · History | 514 | →Parent–child links: r\ |
| History | 2,031 | →Parent–child links: r. re: cartoon | |
| 2010-12-14 09:40 | Diff · History | 310 | →Parent–child links: please address the concerns raised, instead of trying to distract attention from them |
| 2010-12-14 08:35 | Diff · History | 837 | →Parent–child links: r. |
| 2010-12-14 08:29 | Diff · History | -2 | →Parent–child links: fix |
| 2010-12-14 08:27 | Diff · History | 1,353 | →Parent–child links: r. to OC |
| 2010-12-14 08:17 | Diff · History | 168 | →Parent–child links: (edit conflict) |
| 2010-12-14 08:07 | Diff · History | 369 | →Parent–child links: r. to Tony |
| 2010-12-14 07:03 | Diff · History | 989 | →Parent–child links: the so-called "proof" of widespread acceptance is merely opinion |
| 2010-12-13 21:03 | Diff · History | 458 | →Parent–child links: reply |
| 2010-12-12 05:34 | Diff · History | 667 | →Parent–child links: not quite right |
| 2010-11-27 06:15 | Diff · History | 973 | →Parent–child links: r. |
| 2010-11-27 06:06 | Diff · History | 345 | →Parent–child links: r |
| 2010-11-27 06:02 | Diff · History | 345 | →Parent–child links: r. to yet another snarky comment |
| 2010-11-27 04:35 | Diff · History | 776 | →Parent–child links: reply |
| 2010-11-27 03:55 | Diff · History | 211 | →Parent–child links: sign |
| 2010-11-27 03:53 | Diff · History | 209 | →Parent–child links: object |
| 2010-11-23 08:12 | Diff · History | 560 | →Archive frequency: reply |
| 2010-11-23 07:52 | Diff · History | -155 | →Archive frequency: tweaks |
| 2010-11-23 07:49 | Diff · History | 519 | →Archive frequency: thanks |
| 2010-11-23 07:39 | Diff · History | 319 | →Archive frequency: note |
| 2010-11-23 07:35 | Diff · History | 250 | →Archive frequency: more |
| 2010-11-23 07:33 | Diff · History | -25 | →Archive frequency: fix |
| 2010-11-23 07:33 | Diff · History | 1,096 | →Archive frequency: reply - what is this nonsense about an ""agenda" |
| 2010-11-23 07:09 | Diff · History | 0 | missed one |
| 2010-11-23 07:08 | Diff · History | 650 | →Archive frequency: note re: change |
| 2010-11-23 07:05 | Diff · History | 0 | 30 days, commenting below. Kslotte spends a lot of time adjusting talk page archive settings, we can trust his/her judgement. |
| 2010-11-23 04:22 | Diff · History | 0 | This is fine; since when do we seek "consensus" for archive settings? (Certainly not when it was being reduced.) |
| 2010-11-16 03:36 | Diff · History | 355 | →Question about how to link in an article: reply |
| 2010-10-08 06:19 | Diff · History | 1,733 | →Comments/response (no threaded discussion please): No and no |
| 2010-10-07 09:41 | Diff · History | 517 | →Past discussions and clarity?: r. to Tony |
| 2010-10-07 05:10 | Diff · History | 601 | →Past discussions and clarity?: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." |
| 2010-10-06 19:08 | Diff · History | 499 | →Past discussions and clarity?: comment |
| 2010-10-05 21:53 | Diff · History | 1,415 | →Consensus/common terms - arbitrary break #1: r. to Greg |
| 2010-10-05 21:42 | Diff · History | -1 | →Consensus/common terms - arbitrary break #1: tweak |
| 2010-10-05 21:41 | Diff · History | 731 | →Consensus/common terms - arbitrary break #1: reply to Greg (edit conflict) |
| 2010-10-05 21:29 | Diff · History | -41 | →Arbitrary section break on delinking: break point moved to better spot, also as sub-section rather than section |
| 2010-10-05 21:28 | Diff · History | 51 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: moving arbitrary break point to better point |
| 2010-10-05 21:25 | Diff · History | 800 | →Arbitrary section break on delinking: reply to Greg |
| 2010-10-05 16:47 | Diff · History | 132 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: finish |
| 2010-10-05 16:45 | Diff · History | 695 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: expand |
| 2010-10-05 16:38 | Diff · History | 1,330 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: r to Greg |
| 2010-10-05 10:18 | Diff · History | 1,156 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: reply |
| 2010-10-05 09:21 | Diff · History | 1,229 | →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: comment |
| 2010-09-26 07:29 | Diff · History | 102,864 | restore, again - relevant to current discussions, many questions that remain unanswered re" delinking. If archiving is desired, more selective pruning is required. |
| 2010-09-21 09:50 | Diff · History | 421 | →Dispute: comment re: the previous post; that attitude is what causes so much friction on the MoS pages |
| 2010-09-20 09:20 | Diff · History | 505 | →Summing up the linking dispute: comment |
| 2010-09-18 09:00 | Diff · History | 877 | →Dispute: comment |
| 2010-09-18 08:56 | Diff · History | 92,077 | Undid revision 385327636 by Ohconfucius (premature archiving) |
| 2010-06-21 21:40 | Diff · History | 3 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: silly spelling fixes (typpng n tyne keybrds iss frustratn... <grin>) |
| 2010-06-21 21:39 | Diff · History | 476 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: forgot something |
| 2010-06-21 21:37 | Diff · History | 34 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: tweak |
| 2010-06-21 21:36 | Diff · History | 161 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: tweak |
| 2010-06-21 21:34 | Diff · History | 0 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: fix |
| 2010-06-21 21:34 | Diff · History | 532 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: reply |
| 2010-06-21 20:32 | Diff · History | 13 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: tweak |
| 2010-06-21 20:31 | Diff · History | -1 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: sp |
| 2010-06-21 20:29 | Diff · History | 607 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: note |
| 2010-06-21 18:55 | Diff · History | 1,047 | →I thought there was going to be a new effort at cooperation here: There is; this was based on the desire expressed earlier to avoid "loaded language" and should be self-evident |
| 2010-06-19 23:34 | Diff · History | 211 | →RfC?: fair enought, the issue was that the placement made it appear that you also wrote the "PS" above it. |
| 2010-06-19 23:14 | Diff · History | 364 | →RfC?: re: "sea of blue" |
| 2010-06-19 05:03 | Diff · History | 473 | →RfC?: reply |
| 2010-06-16 09:33 | Diff · History | 352 | →Discussion: reply |
| 2010-06-16 09:22 | Diff · History | 1,046 | →Discussion: reply |
| 2010-06-16 09:03 | Diff · History | 508 | →Discussion: reply |
| 2010-05-13 22:42 | Diff · History | 147 | →Discussion: clarify |
| 2010-05-13 22:40 | Diff · History | 7 | →Discussion: indent |
| 2010-05-13 22:39 | Diff · History | 486 | →Discussion: refactor to avoid confusion |
| 2010-05-13 22:17 | Diff · History | 385 | →Discussion: reply |
| 2010-05-13 19:00 | Diff · History | 0 | →Discussion: format |
| 2010-05-13 19:00 | Diff · History | 188 | →Discussion: mor |
| 2010-05-13 18:57 | Diff · History | 1,857 | →Discussion: reply |
| 2010-05-13 16:31 | Diff · History | 68 | →Discussion: tweaks |
| 2010-05-13 16:25 | Diff · History | 1,612 | →Discussion: comment |
| 2010-05-13 16:10 | Diff · History | 17 | →Specific recent examples: arbitrary section break (so that responses aren't all tagged as "Specific recent examples" |
| 2010-04-29 02:34 | Diff · History | 335 | →Arbitrary break 2: reply |
| 2010-04-29 02:22 | Diff · History | 42 | →Arbitrary break 2: tweak |
| 2010-04-29 02:15 | Diff · History | -2 | →Arbitrary break 2: sp fix |
| 2010-04-29 02:14 | Diff · History | 196 | →Arbitrary break 2: tweak |
| 2010-04-29 02:11 | Diff · History | 652 | →Arbitrary break 2: reply |
| 2010-04-22 03:31 | Diff · History | -21 | →Arbitrary break: tweak |
| 2010-04-22 03:08 | Diff · History | 550 | →Arbitrary break: reply |
| 2010-04-21 05:56 | Diff · History | 1,447 | →Arbitrary break: reply |
| 2010-04-21 04:43 | Diff · History | 453 | →Arbitrary break: reply |
| 2010-04-21 03:05 | Diff · History | 716 | →Arbitrary break: reply to HWV258 |
| 2010-04-21 00:05 | Diff · History | 597 | →Arbitrary break: reply |
| 2010-04-20 10:13 | Diff · History | -93 | →Arbitrary break: Meh |
| 2010-04-20 09:54 | Diff · History | 113 | →Arbitrary break: link the summary, just so we're clear |
| 2010-04-20 09:52 | Diff · History | 344 | →Arbitrary break: If you've got nothing nice to say... |
| 2010-04-20 07:53 | Diff · History | 639 | →Arbitrary break: more |
| 2010-04-20 07:46 | Diff · History | 1,085 | →Arbitrary break: reply |
| 2010-04-19 22:10 | Diff · History | -21 | →Arbitrary break: tweak |
| 2010-04-19 22:07 | Diff · History | 145 | →Arbitrary break: rework |
| 2010-04-19 19:10 | Diff · History | 3,523 | →Arbitrary break: comment |
| 2010-04-16 18:37 | Diff · History | 1,169 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: reply |
| 2010-04-16 16:42 | Diff · History | 1,850 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: comment |
| 2010-04-16 04:03 | Diff · History | 6 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: fix |
| 2010-04-16 04:02 | Diff · History | 16 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: fixes |
| 2010-04-16 04:01 | Diff · History | 2 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: sp fix etc. |
| 2010-04-16 03:58 | Diff · History | 7 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: fix |
| 2010-04-16 03:57 | Diff · History | 890 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: reply to Tony1 |
| 2010-04-15 22:19 | Diff · History | -1 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: tweak |
| 2010-04-15 22:18 | Diff · History | 525 | →Linking "New York City" in article on New York City subway: Definitely an appropriate link |
| 2010-04-08 01:49 | Diff · History | 1,052 | →'Germane' again: reply to Tony1 |
| 2010-04-07 03:10 | Diff · History | 587 | →'Germane' again: explanation (thought this went live hours ago, apologies for the inconvenience.) |
| 2010-02-20 23:23 | Diff · History | 1 | →Most overlinked article?: format fix |
| 2010-02-20 23:22 | Diff · History | 1,093 | →Most overlinked article?: reply to Dabomb87 |
| 2010-02-20 23:11 | Diff · History | 1,076 | →Most overlinked article?: reply to Tony1 |
| 2010-02-20 08:55 | Diff · History | -4 | →Most overlinked article?: tweak |
| 2010-02-20 08:55 | Diff · History | 1,845 | →Most overlinked article?: comment/statement re: concerns, as requested by Tony1/Colonies Chris/John/etc. |
| 2010-02-06 20:41 | Diff · History | 755 | →My reversion of a major change: reply |
| 2010-02-05 08:29 | Diff · History | 128 | →My reversion of a major change: more to this; not a major change |
| 2010-02-05 08:27 | Diff · History | 2 | →My reversion of a major change: format |
| 2010-02-05 08:26 | Diff · History | 1,329 | →My reversion of a major change: "relevant" seems to have been proposed as a means of maintaining the spirit of the guideline while making it more accessible; support on that basis |
| 2009-10-12 17:19 | Diff · History | 17 | →Sept update: tweak |
| 2009-10-12 17:17 | Diff · History | 1,668 | →Sept update: note |
| 2009-10-12 15:08 | Diff · History | 11 | →Sept update: tweak |
| 2009-10-12 15:07 | Diff · History | 674 | →Sept update: comment |
| 2009-10-06 22:43 | Diff · History | -1,336 | Reverted to revision 318006641 by A. di M.; spam. |
| 2009-07-24 22:59 | Diff · History | 1,255 | →"plain English words": comment |
| 2009-06-23 21:59 | Diff · History | 1,018 | →RfC: self-links to conform to title reiteration style: archive RfC (bot has closed, consensus is that this is over) |
| 2009-05-31 20:20 | Diff · History | 16 | →Summary for RFC of current !votes: restoring section heading (edit summaries, diffs link to it); moving HA's comment in chronological order |
| 2009-05-28 16:04 | Diff · History | 482 | →Summary for RFC of current !votes: comment |
| 2009-05-27 17:57 | Diff · History | 45 | →RfC: self-links to conform to title reiteration style: update |
| 2009-05-09 16:39 | Diff · History | 783 | →Over and under, the debate continues: new section |
| 2009-02-28 00:36 | Diff · History | 1,138 | →What generally should not be linked: comment |
| 2008-10-14 20:01 | Diff · History | 358 | →WP:OVERLINK as a main-article for just the over-underlink section of WP:MOSLINK: note |
| 2008-09-11 07:23 | Diff · History | 547 | →Changes to "Overlinking" section: more to this |
| 2008-09-11 07:12 | Diff · History | 530 | →Changes to "Overlinking" section: reply |
| 2008-09-10 23:49 | Diff · History | 1,497 | →Changes to "Overlinking" section: new section |
All times are in UTC.