Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Focus on the Family (Log · Page History) |
| User | Belchfire (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 24 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 5 (20.8%) |
| Reverted edits | 7 (29.2%) |
| atbe1 | 6.2 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 955 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -2,637 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
24 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
5 (20.8%)
Manual edits
·
19 (79.2%)
Reverted edits
·
7 (29.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
17 (70.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-12-19 00:32 | Diff · History | -17 | Undid revision 528673114 by Bradyculous (talk)rv good faith edit - creates redundancy |
| 2012-10-07 04:15 | Diff · History | -523 | (reverted) →Option Ultrasound Program: Bachmann's misstatement is not relevant to this article. |
| 2012-10-07 04:14 | Diff · History | -241 | →Option Ultrasound Program: the source clearly shows that this is a fringe opinion, not worthy of mention here. |
| 2012-10-07 02:16 | Diff · History | -56 | (reverted) neutral wording |
| 2012-08-14 02:47 | Diff · History | 9 | remember, it's VERY important to say what the sources say! |
| 2012-08-14 02:46 | Diff · History | -141 | Undid revision 507307948 by Still-24-45-42-125 (talk)This is already in the very next sentence. No need to mention it twice. |
| 2012-08-14 01:53 | Diff · History | 264 | conforming to sources (edited with ProveIt) |
| 2012-08-14 01:49 | Diff · History | -227 | rm misquoted sources pending creation of more accurate wording. |
| 2012-08-12 18:48 | Diff · History | -231 | (reverted) rm undue weight, reorganize for flow and coherence per wp:lead |
| 2012-08-06 17:09 | Diff · History | -15 | (reverted) Undid revision 506091275 by Insomesia (talk)synth, and not relevant in this context anyway. pick one thing SPLC is known for and go with that. and it isn't going to be "monitoring hate groups" |
| 2012-08-06 00:55 | Diff · History | -158 | c/e - edited for UNDUE and to restore agreed wording from DRN resolution |
| 2012-07-28 01:49 | Diff · History | -256 | 1st citation is an editorial, not a usable RS. 2nd citation doesn't support change to article text. again, seek consensus before changing lead after you already took this through DRN |
| 2012-07-28 01:46 | Diff · History | 123 | restoring unexplained removal of content |
| 2012-07-28 01:44 | Diff · History | -280 | no consensus for this addition. rm for undue weight. get agreement before adding this again |
| 2012-07-27 23:47 | Diff · History | -66 | misrepresenting research is an allegation made by an outside party, not a FotF policy. rm to avoid undue weight. |
| 2012-07-27 23:37 | Diff · History | 7 | No sourcing for generic opposition to gay rights. opposition to same sex marriage, more narrowly, IS supported. |
| 2012-07-27 20:08 | Diff · History | -756 | No interest in pursuing 3rd paragraph, so... implemented consensus version of new lead copy-pasted from Talk, including switch-out of Dobson for Daly in segment about radio broadcasts, and minus questionable bit about counseling |
| 2012-07-27 05:00 | Diff · History | -10 | Undid revision 504376623 by Still-24-45-42-125 (talk)Citation does say otherwise, in FotF's opinion. I think I made that clear. |
| 2012-07-27 04:30 | Diff · History | 552 | →Marriage and family: rv change, add citations, rm 'Dr.' per WP:CREDENTIAL (edited with ProveIt) |
| 2012-07-27 03:47 | Diff · History | -55 | →Boundless: rm statement not supported by source |
| 2012-07-24 18:15 | Diff · History | -25 | (reverted) Undid revision 503983908 by Still-24-45-42-125 (talk)These are non-controversial changes that remove no content. Stop editing disruptively based on your personal animus. |
| 2012-07-24 18:03 | Diff · History | -25 | (reverted) Rewrote and reorganized lead per WP:LEAD and WP:MOSINTRO (and common sense) |
| 2012-07-24 17:16 | Diff · History | -430 | Not really an open question per all relevant policy regarding leads and intros. Current lead lends far too much importance to SPLC, and too much weight to matters only briefly covered further down. |
| 2012-07-22 01:42 | Diff · History | -350 | (reverted) Removing unsourced content, fix cites |
All times are in UTC.