Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:Female genital mutilation (Log · Page History) |
| User | Atomaton (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 91 |
| Minor edits | 12 (13.2%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 15.5 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 102,564 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -206 |
Minor edits
·
12 (13.2%)
Major edits
·
79 (86.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
91 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
91 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-08-17 00:21 | Diff · History | 554 | →Male genital cutting: comment reply |
| 2010-08-09 19:48 | Diff · History | 568 | →Male genital cutting: very different things |
| 2010-04-18 22:13 | Diff · History | 262 | →Double standard?: Read the articles |
| 2010-04-16 14:55 | Diff · History | 415 | →"Medical reasons": comment asking to work it out |
| 2010-03-16 16:03 | Diff · History | 245 | →Moving the article: sp |
| 2010-03-16 15:47 | Diff · History | 634 | →Moving the article: Do not move the article |
| 2008-09-01 01:50 | Diff · History | -30 | nest, rate for WP Sexuality |
| 2008-08-12 22:53 | Diff · History | 114 | →Removed image: Distress alone not sufficient. |
| 2008-08-12 21:44 | Diff · History | 1 | →Removed image: change word |
| 2008-08-12 21:42 | Diff · History | 377 | →Removed image: comment |
| 2008-08-12 21:35 | Diff · History | 0 | →Removed image: sp |
| 2008-08-12 21:33 | Diff · History | 1,267 | →Removed image: opposed to placing the image |
| 2008-08-10 22:10 | Diff · History | 731 | →Statements: comments |
| 2008-08-10 21:53 | Diff · History | 2,795 | →Improper use of NPOV/POV tag on Female Genital Cutting 2: comments |
| 2008-08-10 18:21 | Diff · History | 69 | →Improper use of NPOV/POV tag on Female Genital Cutting 2: Update link |
| 2008-08-10 16:49 | Diff · History | -25 | →Improper use of NPOV/POV tag on Female Genital Cutting 2: change link |
| 2008-08-10 16:48 | Diff · History | 35 | →Discussion: sp |
| 2008-08-10 16:46 | Diff · History | 0 | →Statements: sp |
| 2008-08-10 16:44 | Diff · History | 58 | →Statements: sign |
| 2008-08-10 16:41 | Diff · History | 1,301 | →Discussion: I respect your view on that |
| 2008-08-10 16:33 | Diff · History | 1,107 | →Improper use of NPOV/POV tag on Female Genital Cutting 2: new section |
| 2008-08-10 16:11 | Diff · History | 816 | →Statements: opinion |
| 2008-08-10 16:00 | Diff · History | 1,216 | →Discussion: comment |
| 2008-08-10 15:41 | Diff · History | 3,707 | →POV tag: comment |
| 2008-08-10 00:09 | Diff · History | 0 | →POV tag: sp |
| 2008-08-10 00:07 | Diff · History | 1,622 | →POV tag: opinion |
| 2008-08-06 23:25 | Diff · History | 501 | →Atomaton's "Hypothetical": Irony would probably not be ther term I would use. |
| 2008-08-06 22:26 | Diff · History | 194 | reply |
| 2008-08-06 20:59 | Diff · History | 2,034 | Survey allowed for closure on the matter, or so is the perspective of many. In most cases, discussion is open ended unless a consensus is found. |
| 2008-08-06 19:50 | Diff · History | 9 | →Atomaton's "Hypothetical": sp |
| 2008-08-06 19:48 | Diff · History | 3 | →Atomaton's "Hypothetical": indent |
| 2008-08-06 19:48 | Diff · History | 1,253 | →Atomaton's "Hypothetical": *I don't understand what you mean. |
| 2008-08-06 18:52 | Diff · History | 2,262 | more natter |
| 2008-08-06 00:26 | Diff · History | 1,441 | time for moving on |
| 2008-08-05 22:03 | Diff · History | 1,513 | →POV tag: no incivility, comment had nothing to do with you |
| 2008-08-05 21:46 | Diff · History | 1,029 | →POV tag: Dispute |
| 2008-08-05 21:32 | Diff · History | 734 | →POV tag: if you fail to gain consensus for your change, you remove your own tag. |
| 2008-08-05 20:29 | Diff · History | 1,910 | →POV tag: hypothetical, did not happen, but expresses my view |
| 2008-08-05 19:50 | Diff · History | 4 | →POV tag: indent |
| 2008-08-05 19:49 | Diff · History | 0 | →POV tag: sp |
| 2008-08-05 19:49 | Diff · History | 462 | simply |
| 2008-08-05 19:29 | Diff · History | 213 | Okay, so what consensus exists if there is no consensus to change? |
| 2008-08-05 19:18 | Diff · History | 3,309 | →POV tag: tag discussion |
| 2008-08-04 23:43 | Diff · History | 2,164 | →Removal of POV tag: more opinion |
| 2008-08-04 22:51 | Diff · History | 656 | →Removal of POV tag: I wasn't seeking your agreement or approval -- I was explaining why you are not applying NPOV correctly. No need to agree. |
| 2008-08-04 22:37 | Diff · History | 1,396 | →Removal of POV tag: Their currently is no dispute about the title, as that was just resolved. There currently is no dispute about the content either. There is no valid reason for a POV tag |
| 2008-08-04 22:08 | Diff · History | 1 | →Removal of POV tag: sp |
| 2008-08-04 22:08 | Diff · History | 1,254 | →Removal of POV tag: Need other editors to enforce rules too -- remove NPOV tag too. |
| 2008-08-04 21:59 | Diff · History | 1,864 | →Removal of POV tag: Putting POV tag on the article with no complaint is an attempt to disrupt, and not welcome |
| 2008-08-04 13:34 | Diff · History | -117 | →RFC on rename of article: remove RFC as survey ended |
| 2008-08-04 04:01 | Diff · History | 425 | we asked for his opinion, he gave it. |
| 2008-07-30 23:31 | Diff · History | 1,787 | →Survey: still need cite, your cite disproves your point. |
| 2008-07-30 17:26 | Diff · History | 850 | →Survey: comments |
| 2008-07-30 17:14 | Diff · History | 1,690 | →Survey: comments |
| 2008-07-30 16:39 | Diff · History | 3 | →Discussion: sp & grammar |
| 2008-07-30 16:17 | Diff · History | -34 | →Survey: rm Extraneous text, spaces |
| 2008-07-27 13:35 | Diff · History | 65 | →Discussion: cleanup and edit |
| 2008-07-27 13:32 | Diff · History | 4,414 | →Discussion: responses |
| 2008-07-26 23:02 | Diff · History | 237 | →RFC on rename of article: comments in move section please |
| 2008-07-26 21:15 | Diff · History | 3,423 | →RFC on rename of article: new section |
| 2008-07-26 20:28 | Diff · History | 5,568 | →Discussion: If we are going to use most common term, then we should change it the Female Genital Mutilation, rather than using the neutral FGC term for the article title. |
| 2008-07-26 19:58 | Diff · History | 2,202 | →Discussion: of course there is a difference -- and of course I have a non-neutral POV. Eliminating POV is not our goal. is removing male foreskin different than infibulation?? YES |
| 2008-07-26 19:09 | Diff · History | 1,211 | →Survey: more accurate, scholar database, and more recent, shows recent usage rather than archaic usage |
| 2008-07-26 18:56 | Diff · History | 1,639 | comments |
| 2008-07-16 01:21 | Diff · History | 1,586 | reply |
| 2008-07-16 00:42 | Diff · History | 1,494 | →Survey: rebut |
| 2008-07-16 00:14 | Diff · History | 1,888 | →Survey: rebut |
| 2008-07-14 21:06 | Diff · History | 79 | →Survey: date |
| 2008-07-14 21:00 | Diff · History | 788 | →Discussion: recent references |
| 2008-07-14 17:51 | Diff · History | 1,527 | →Survey: Oppose name change as of the three terms, FGC is most neutral, and most used by current researchers. |
| 2008-07-14 12:59 | Diff · History | 1,546 | →Removal of POV tag: new section |
| 2008-06-24 20:31 | Diff · History | 1,498 | →Article Title: respond to Blackworm |
| 2008-06-24 00:48 | Diff · History | 2,866 | →Article Title: Res Blackworm - People can look for themselves |
| 2008-06-23 17:39 | Diff · History | 1,384 | reply |
| 2008-06-22 22:33 | Diff · History | 1,149 | respond |
| 2008-06-22 03:22 | Diff · History | 95 | →Mutilation: signed |
| 2008-06-22 03:20 | Diff · History | 281 | →Mutilation: example given |
| 2008-06-22 03:13 | Diff · History | 2,471 | →Mutilation: Date explaining FGC as most common used term by scholars in recent past. |
| 2008-06-22 01:29 | Diff · History | 940 | →Mutilation: Female Genital Cutting the most common term -- which is why the article was named that previously |
| 2008-06-22 01:17 | Diff · History | 1,099 | →Article Title: admit I missed the debate |
| 2008-06-21 16:32 | Diff · History | 4,047 | →Article Title: reply |
| 2008-06-21 15:03 | Diff · History | 1,192 | →Article Title: new section |
| 2007-01-25 23:15 | Diff · History | 3,171 | →UN vs WHO: ''official'' adds nothing valuable |
| 2007-01-25 17:29 | Diff · History | 2,808 | →UN vs WHO: discussion |
| 2007-01-25 15:50 | Diff · History | 1,376 | →UN vs WHO: No "official" term used by UN and WHO. FGC and FGM both used, as appropriate towards the goal. |
| 2007-01-09 23:09 | Diff · History | 322 | →Ethiopia: need cite |
| 2006-11-06 13:08 | Diff · History | 244 | →Survey: add |
| 2006-11-06 12:56 | Diff · History | 381 | →Survey: Use term that United Nations uses, FGC |
| 2006-10-05 22:48 | Diff · History | 1,205 | →Main Page: ‘Circumcision’ to include Male Genital Mutilation (MGM): response |
| 2006-10-04 00:51 | Diff · History | 1,194 | →Main Page: ‘Circumcision’ to include Male Genital Mutilation (MGM): more opinion |
| 2006-10-02 20:57 | Diff · History | 319 | →Main Page: ‘Circumcision’ to include Male Genital Mutilation (MGM): combining would be a mistake |
All times are in UTC.