Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Back Art LaPella • Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking (Log · Page History)
User Art LaPella (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 130
Minor edits 7 (5.4%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 1 (0.8%)
atbe1 6
Added (bytes)2 65,181
Deleted (bytes) -18
Minor edits · 7 (5.4%)
Major edits · 123 (94.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 130 (100%)
Reverted edits · 1 (0.8%)
Unreverted edits · 129 (99.2%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2012-11-09 00:28 Diff · History 355 →Confusion over "particular relevance" and major cities.: trolling??
2012-11-07 22:42 Diff · History 364 →Confusion over "particular relevance" and major cities.: changing the example
2012-11-02 20:26 Diff · History 609 →Confusion over "particular relevance" and major cities.: civility
2012-10-24 19:40 Diff · History 0 →What generally should not be linked -- can we bring this to closure?: It says "editable", so I corrected a misspelling.
2012-07-07 23:33 Diff · History 558 →Policy question - red links: WP:REDLINK basics
2012-07-04 22:13 Diff · History 177 →Embedded citations: in that case
2012-07-04 19:35 Diff · History 241 →Embedded citations: systemic problem
2012-05-22 05:58 Diff · History 769 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): another round of answers
2012-05-21 21:29 Diff · History 13 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): clarify myself
2012-05-21 21:25 Diff · History 811 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): the main point is
2012-05-20 17:27 Diff · History 9 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): clarify myself
2012-05-20 17:02 Diff · History 1,011 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): the index
2012-05-20 05:17 Diff · History 1,008 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): randomly chosen
2012-05-20 04:37 Diff · History 256 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): previous discussion
2012-05-20 04:13 Diff · History 362 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): much more extreme
2012-05-19 17:52 Diff · History 941 →Expanding on the idea of reducing lead linking (without affecting body linking): Practically speaking
2012-05-11 16:44 Diff · History 738 →Major geographic regions: Ricky Martin
2012-05-11 13:46 Diff · History 434 →Major geographic regions: invisible disclaimer
2012-05-10 02:11 Diff · History 24 →Major geographic regions: remove "s" and show the link
2012-05-10 02:09 Diff · History -18 →Major geographic regions: "liner" is a bad example, because "ocean liner" is previously linked
2012-05-10 01:50 Diff · History 369 →Major geographic regions: refitted
2012-05-10 01:31 Diff · History 781 →Major geographic regions: QE2
2012-05-01 20:11 Diff · History 381 →Link Lank Lunk: No links wouldn't please anyone.
2012-04-30 20:56 Diff · History 943 →Link Lank Lunk: replies
2012-04-29 19:15 Diff · History 130 →Link Lank Lunk: another sentence
2012-04-29 19:13 Diff · History 1,285 →Link Lank Lunk: its own assumptions
2012-04-29 03:54 Diff · History 1,142 →Link Lank Lunk: oppose all links?
2012-04-27 16:57 Diff · History 409 →Linking sense: thank you
2012-04-27 14:13 Diff · History 332 →Linking sense: ask it this way
2012-04-27 05:34 Diff · History 397 →Linking sense: Easily fixed
2012-04-27 01:45 Diff · History 627 →Linking sense: not breaking enough laws
2012-04-26 14:22 Diff · History 375 →Linking sense: it makes a difference
2012-04-25 23:39 Diff · History 725 →Linking sense: enemy of the good
2012-04-25 23:24 Diff · History 324 →Linking sense: overwhelming majority
2012-04-25 20:20 Diff · History 737 →Linking sense: hundredth time
2012-03-30 22:04 Diff · History 159 →100 links to The Observer?: 600 miles
2012-03-30 20:37 Diff · History 193 →100 links to The Observer?: I'll admit it
2011-10-29 22:36 Diff · History 263 →Repeated links okay: lead and first occurence?: comes closer
2011-10-28 23:21 Diff · History 800 →Linking United States: two answers
2011-10-28 00:40 Diff · History 610 →Linking United States: area, population, language
2011-10-15 06:23 Diff · History 625 →removed overlinking in image captions edit: I don't think ...
2011-09-08 20:53 Diff · History 399 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: sockpuppetry?
2011-09-08 00:15 Diff · History 616 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: left side of the page
2011-09-04 21:59 Diff · History 465 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: well no,
2011-09-04 20:49 Diff · History 234 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: Oh well.
2011-09-03 18:04 Diff · History 485 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: every word
2011-09-02 03:59 Diff · History 252 →Moved: explain how
2011-09-02 03:16 Diff · History 350 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: any other word?
2011-08-31 21:28 Diff · History 760 →Overlinking vs. overpolicing: extreme
2011-08-26 13:50 Diff · History 449 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: Economy of Austria
2011-08-25 23:56 Diff · History 792 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: I think so.
2011-08-25 20:48 Diff · History 44 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: forest
2011-08-25 20:44 Diff · History 158 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: 1%
2011-08-25 20:35 Diff · History 1,039 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: point by point
2011-08-25 17:11 Diff · History 4 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: "why", after rereading the previous post
2011-08-25 17:10 Diff · History 995 →Underlinking - places, languages and geographic features: United States
2011-08-15 01:07 Diff · History 228 →Multiple links in a table?: recognizes Chicago
2011-08-14 23:10 Diff · History 233 →Multiple links in a table?: OVERLINK
2011-08-14 17:25 Diff · History 109 →Multiple links in a table?: big cities
2011-08-04 05:01 Diff · History 236 →nbsp in wikilinks: EMPTY BOXES
2011-08-04 00:27 Diff · History 94 →nbsp in wikilinks: still nothing
2011-08-04 00:23 Diff · History 145 →nbsp in wikilinks: still nothing
2011-08-03 06:48 Diff · History 522 →nbsp in wikilinks: nothing
2011-08-03 04:11 Diff · History 743 →nbsp in wikilinks: above my knowledge
2011-08-02 21:42 Diff · History 1,494 →nbsp in wikilinks: 2 paragraphs
2011-06-05 16:17 Diff · History 211 →Needs clarification: hyphen (also corrected unintended typo by the previous editor on a third editor's comment)
2011-06-02 03:06 Diff · History 354 →Needs clarification: change the guideline?
2011-05-31 04:06 Diff · History 281 →Needs clarification: mantle
2011-03-23 20:37 Diff · History 1 I edited OhConfucius's post so it wouldn't add the whole page to the Falun Gong category. I assume OhConfucius didn't intend to do that.
2011-02-10 22:39 Diff · History 324 →Oppose delinking inside templates: 850 files
2011-01-05 22:44 Diff · History 470 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): Or in principle,
2011-01-05 02:31 Diff · History 181 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): actually count
2011-01-04 22:56 Diff · History 1,258 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): point by point
2011-01-04 22:09 Diff · History 747 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): and nothing else?
2011-01-04 21:25 Diff · History 120 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): link mini-survey
2011-01-04 21:17 Diff · History 725 →Arbitrary break (sect. "Parent–child links"): Chumbawamba
2010-12-31 20:06 Diff · History 354 →Arbitrary break: comments like this
2010-12-30 22:49 Diff · History 6 →Arbitrary break: past perfect tense
2010-12-30 22:30 Diff · History 833 →Arbitrary break: At the other extreme
2010-12-28 22:09 Diff · History 107 →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: another sentence
2010-12-28 22:06 Diff · History 1,406 →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: waves
2010-12-28 07:06 Diff · History 21 →Arbitrary break: paper
2010-12-28 07:02 Diff · History 522 →Arbitrary break: experiment
2010-12-28 02:48 Diff · History 216 →Arbitrary break: Flobots
2010-12-26 20:28 Diff · History 498 →Recent change that removed the "relevance" qualification: agreement
2010-12-24 23:40 Diff · History 541 →Arbitrary break: If you mean
2010-12-24 23:15 Diff · History 375 →Arbitrary break: Napoleon
2010-12-24 19:20 Diff · History 294 →Parent–child links: Me too!
2010-12-24 08:55 Diff · History 450 →nerdy piping: examples
2010-12-24 04:41 Diff · History 357 →Parent–child links: the serious answer
2010-12-14 01:40 Diff · History 957 →Parent–child links: 3 bullets
2010-12-13 06:04 Diff · History 559 →Parent–child links: I can't.
2010-12-13 03:30 Diff · History 492 →Parent–child links: no-brainer?
2010-12-12 17:31 Diff · History 316 (reverted)  →Parent–child links: gently
2010-12-04 21:38 Diff · History 458 →nerdy piping: more specifically
2010-11-27 08:00 Diff · History 385 →Parent–child links: Pacific again
2010-11-27 05:24 Diff · History 328 →Parent–child links: escalating
2010-11-23 21:40 Diff · History 140 →Archive frequency: joke
2010-10-30 03:45 Diff · History 634 →Organization here re external link syntax guidelines: "can"
2010-10-26 01:01 Diff · History 204 →Poodle/dog?: Anacortes Ferry
2010-10-09 04:09 Diff · History 612 →"Most articles" vs "Nearly all": Italy
2010-10-07 22:58 Diff · History 1,565 →Comments/response (no threaded discussion please): yes
2010-10-06 20:35 Diff · History 1,213 →Past discussions and clarity?: meditate
2010-10-06 20:01 Diff · History 964 →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: particularly relevant
2010-10-06 04:35 Diff · History 228 →Consensus/common terms - arbitrary break #1: I heard you
2010-10-06 04:30 Diff · History 291 →Pros and cons: I suppose
2010-10-05 22:23 Diff · History 490 →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: answering my own section
2010-10-04 20:53 Diff · History 1,436 →Consensus and arbitrary removal of relevant common terms. Again: more answers
2010-10-03 20:01 Diff · History 346 →Pros and cons: RfC
2010-10-01 02:44 Diff · History 471 →Break: once
2010-09-30 21:30 Diff · History 167 →The real dispute: Relevance (explanatory vs. navigational linkage): that part?
2010-09-30 18:32 Diff · History 270 →The real dispute: Relevance (explanatory vs. navigational linkage): remind
2010-09-29 20:24 Diff · History 490 →The real dispute: Relevance (explanatory vs. navigational linkage): circles
2010-09-29 04:12 Diff · History 535 →The real dispute: Relevance (explanatory vs. navigational linkage): back up
2010-09-29 02:31 Diff · History 679 →The real dispute: Relevance (explanatory vs. navigational linkage): better
2010-09-28 20:48 Diff · History 429 →Link "dilution": seldom clicked
2010-09-28 05:42 Diff · History 435 →Link "dilution": semantics
2010-09-27 22:18 Diff · History 338 →Link "dilution": ideal
2010-09-27 18:23 Diff · History 285 →Link "dilution": chocolate
2010-09-25 01:42 Diff · History 151 →Summing up the linking dispute: another sigh
2010-09-24 20:38 Diff · History 1,338 →Summing up the linking dispute: list of answers
2010-09-24 02:01 Diff · History 768 →Summing up the linking dispute: mandate
2010-09-22 06:24 Diff · History 167 →Dispute: another sentence
2010-09-22 06:09 Diff · History 357 →Dispute: quarantine
2010-09-20 20:29 Diff · History 338 →Summing up the linking dispute: this?
2010-09-20 00:20 Diff · History 297 →Summing up the linking dispute: (linking)
2010-09-19 22:59 Diff · History 1,139 →Dispute: show the change
2010-09-19 06:59 Diff · History 779 →Dispute: 8, 9, 10, 11 again
2010-09-17 21:36 Diff · History 1,720 →Dispute: from Art
2010-09-17 05:56 Diff · History 941 →Dispute: REPEATLINK
All times are in UTC.