Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Xubuntu (Log · Page History) |
User | 99.30.226.124 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 7 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 2 (28.6%) |
Reverted edits | 6 (85.7%) |
atbe1 | 2.4 |
Added (bytes)2 | 0 |
Deleted (bytes) | -393 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
7 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
2 (28.6%)
Manual edits
·
5 (71.4%)
Reverted edits
·
6 (85.7%)
Unreverted edits
·
1 (14.3%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2010-11-14 07:32 | Diff · History | -393 | (reverted) This is not vandalism nor warring. Original page has "intended." Edited page used Beta as "proof." This is illegitimate. Restored page to original intent. Burden is on otherwise. |
2010-11-07 18:52 | Diff · History | -393 | Undid revision 395329240 by Ahunt (talk) Once again this is NOT Vandalism. Greenman YOU do NOT accuse me of this again. You refuse to have a convers |
2010-11-07 09:21 | Diff · History | -393 | (reverted) Undid revision 395301702 by Greenman (talk) |
2010-11-07 00:56 | Diff · History | -393 | (reverted) I reverted it back. Do NOT ACCUSE me of vandalism again. Read the discussion board for more information. This is a legitimate revert against a biased poster. |
2010-11-06 20:18 | Diff · History | -397 | (reverted) Added comments are speculative and argumentative. Whether it is or not, is unimportant since it is "intended to use..." A discussion paragraph would be more appropriate for this information. |
2010-11-04 05:53 | Diff · History | -397 | (reverted) |
2010-10-28 12:30 | Diff · History | -397 | (reverted) |
All times are in UTC.