Back
66.217.118.38
•
Talk:Sentence spacing
•
en.wikipedia.org
Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:Sentence spacing (Log · Page History) |
| User | 66.217.118.38 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 9 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 0 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 7,297 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -1 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
9 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
9 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
9 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-21 14:06 | Diff · History | 909 | →Neutrality Tag 2: POV use of individual sources |
| 2011-01-21 13:03 | Diff · History | 770 | →Distinction between manuscript and print: massive problem |
| 2011-01-21 12:04 | Diff · History | 618 | →definition of font(2): new subsection |
| 2011-01-21 11:13 | Diff · History | 1,742 | →Neutrality tag: re-iterate significance of Loh 2002 and provide text, add Bringhurst text |
| 2011-01-21 08:58 | Diff · History | 740 | →Slate.com: it is satire, not scholarly |
| 2011-01-21 07:51 | Diff · History | 7 | →Neutrality tag: clarification |
| 2011-01-21 07:44 | Diff · History | 1,496 | →Neutrality tag: and do you agree that WP:UCS is also generally considered to be policy? |
| 2011-01-21 06:27 | Diff · History | -1 | →Neutrality tag: fix inconsistency |
| 2011-01-21 06:24 | Diff · History | 1,015 | →Neutrality tag: no objective evidence of being "obsolete" half of survey respondents are still use double-spacing, it is current APA manuscript style, MLA it is option, science supports |
All times are in UTC.