Please leave me any messages here, or feel free to email me. Russavia (dyskusja) 12:53, 14 cze 2012 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Here, in Polish Wikipedia, we don't use names in other languages if Polish name exist. Otherwise tehere would be not 900 000 articles but, additionally, 90 000 000 redirects (from names in main languages). Why Polish Navy, but not Polskiy Wojennomorskij Fłot (+cyrylic)? Ciacho5 (dyskusja) 10:04, 10 sie 2012 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

My apologies Ciacho5, I know in some other projects redirects like that are made to make it easier for people to find specific articles. But if plwp doesn't do it this way, I can respect that. Thanks for letting me know. Russavia (dyskusja) 10:37, 10 sie 2012 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

• No problem. Another matter is responding. In Polish Wikipedia we have (shocking sometimes) custom to reply not on own talk page but on talk page of recipient. So, you should post reply on my talk page. There is messaging system and recipient receives info (orange field on top of open page You have new message on your talk page). When you post reply on your talk page, I can not notice it. Ciacho5 (dyskusja) 10:42, 10 sie 2012 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

I want you in my room. Now, and clean your desktop, you are fired. Krzysiu ✉ 22:52, 27 wrz 2012 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Пожалуйста: Plik:Konsulat Generalny Federacji Rosyjskiej w Poznaniu.jpg. Извините, я забыл загрузить файл. С уважением Poznaniak odpowiedz 20:34, 21 lis 2012 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Fantastico. Danke, very much. :) Russavia ✉ 09:58, 22 lis 2012 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Wraz z wprowadzeniem do Wikipedii wersji przejrzanych wszystkie edycje dokonywane przez początkujących i niezalogowanych użytkowników muszą zostać oznaczone jako przejrzane przez wikipedystę z uprawnieniami redaktora – takiego jak Ty :)

Mechanizm funkcjonowania wersji przejrzanych został opisany na kilku stronach:

• Wikipedia:Wersje przejrzane
• Wikipedia:Redaktorzy
• Pomoc:Wersje oznaczone
• Pomoc:FAQ/Wersje oznaczone

W skrócie: jako przejrzany oznacza się artykuł wolny od wandalizmów. Nie oznacza to, że artykuł musi zostać sprawdzony pod kątem merytorycznym. Celem wersji przejrzanych jest jedynie wychwycenie oczywistych nieprawidłowości, ale oczywiście warto poprawić np. literówki, jeśli się je zauważy. Mamy szansę poprawienia całej Wikipedii. Wykorzystajmy to.

Pamiętaj, aby szczególnie uważnie przeglądać artykuły, które są przeglądane po raz pierwszy (tzn. w prawym górnym rogu widnieje komunikat: „ Brak wersji przejrzanej”). Najlepiej jest zacząć od stron, które sam utworzyłeś lub posiadasz w obserwowanych (kliknij, by zobaczyć pełną listę stron, które obserwujesz).

Sprawdzenie artykułu, który posiada już wersję przejrzaną, polega najczęściej na porównaniu z nią ostatnio wprowadzonych zmian (tzw. szkicem). Zobacz też jak patrolujemy ostatnie zmiany.

Na stronie specjalnej zdezaktualizowane przejrzane strony znajduje się lista artykułów oczekujących na ponowne przejrzenie. Zaglądaj tam, jeśli tylko masz czas.

Jak oznaczać artykuły?

Na końcu każdego artykułu i szablonu oraz na stronie porównywania wersji znajdują się przyciski „Oznacz jako przejrzaną”. By oznaczyć wersję, należy po prostu kliknąć. Jeżeli chcesz odznaczyć wersję przejrzaną, musisz kliknąć „Wycofaj oznaczenie jako przejrzana”. Jeżeli chcesz najpierw przetestować wersje oznaczone, wejdź na Testową Wiki.

Cofanie zmian

Wraz z uprawnieniami redaktora uzyskałeś także możliwość szybszego cofania zmian. Oznacza to, że w przypadku ewidentnych wandalizmów możesz użyć przycisku „cofnij” (zamiast „anuluj edycję”), którego naciśnięcie powoduje natychmiastowe wycofanie edycji, bez konieczności wypełniania opisu zmian.

Jeżeli masz wątpliwości, zadaj pytanie . Postaramy się szybko odpowiedzieć.

Ten komunikat został wysłany automatycznie przez bota Beau.bot (dyskusja) 23:45, 4 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

John Belushi -- komentarz 18:01, 17 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Ok. I deleted the fragment about drawball. Sources aren't showing, that there is any connection between this situation and a meme: article in Cooltura says something like: "polish flag was drawn, everybody hated it and Polandball magically appeared". I deleted also part about Smoleńsk crash (there is no evidence that it made Polandball popular), and a fragment saying "Russians stopped all discussions with Polish of which country is better", which definitely doesn't fit in encyclopedia. Other changes were minor ones and after that I think the article can be kept Barcival (dyskusja) 13:50, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Well, it says that: "we saw the famous Smoleńsk tree with Order of the Smile, and the president Crashynski instead of Kaczyński". I have seen really many Polandball drawings and none of them included any tree or president. So I'm afraid that the author of this article misunderstood the meme and it shouldn't be used as a source at all. Barcival (dyskusja) 14:30, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

I can believe that comics exist. But if they are hidden deep in the internet, they couldn't have enough notability to make Polandball popular. The search interest on Know Your Meme, which is IMO better source in this subject than, unknown for me, hiro.pl, shows clearly that popularity of the meme was decreasing after that date. If you really want it, you can add this information to the article again, but I don't find it a good idea. Barcival (dyskusja) 21:53, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Bardzo proszę o stosowanie opisów zmian w języku polskim. A. Bronikowski zostaw wiadomość 15:43, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

I do apologise, but I can not into Polish, only into English, and Russian (intermediate). I see that you are en-3, so perhaps if you would like to ask the question in English, we could converse in a language in which are both able to understand -- being a native speaker I will keep in mind that you are not. We can then discuss whatever it is you would like to discuss; whether that is which is the better wodka -- Belvedere or Moskovskaya; whether kiełbasa or kotbasa is tastier; or the question that you are asking for an answer to. Is it ok to continue in Anglieski? Cheers, Russavia ✉ 16:10, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Well. So first of all - at Polish Wikipedia we used to answer on disputant's talk page. Second - please place {{user pl-0}} on your user page, to avoid confusion. And third - it would be much more convinient for all Wikipedia users, if you had used Polish not only in articles, but in edit summaries as well. Thanks in advance, A. Bronikowski zostaw wiadomość 11:17, 20 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

No worries, thanks for your arguments, which all in all help in making a better judgment and a better encyclopedia, as long as they stay meritocratic and not personal :) Pundit | mówże 19:25, 19 sty 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Hello! You are getting a very well-known person on Polish Wikipedia:-) We are trying to solve the problem with Polish files on Commons [1]. As you can guess easily, we would like to save the files, at least the most important ones. If you have suggestions how to fix it, they are welcome. I have noticed that you edit here. It is nice. Thank you for illustrating the articles. I hope you will continue. To avoid problems with administration, please try to use standard descriptions – they are under in the edititon window (light green squares). Ilustr. means dat you add or repair illustration in the article. Dr. techn. means small technical changes. Greetings. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 11:05, 14 lut 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

By the way. File = Plik in Polish. If you don't forget, please change it in description of an illustration in the article. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 11:14, 14 lut 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

• Thank you for your answer! During the discussion (I attached the link to the discussion above) I have already proposed to other Polish wikipedians to write a letter to the Sejm and ask for clarification and/or permission to use the photos, but somehow nobody reacted. I knew that you did like this and got the permission from Russian government. I still kept your ingenious idea in back of my mind, but, because I am not an expert in copyright, I was waiting for your answer and I am glad it has finally come today. Of course, I am willing to write a Polish version of your letter to the Sejm and advise you whenever you need it during writing. I hope we will get a satisfactory answer from the Sejm, but one never knows. At least it will be good to clear the whole situation with the photos. You can use my e-mail address hbukietowa(at)gmail.com, if it is easier for you to communicate via Gmail while working on the letter to the Sejm. But please note that my computer is not on line 24 hours a day. You can also use my talk page (in Polish dyskusja). In this case just press a blue link dyskusja next to my nick Hortensja. Greetings. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 13:26, 21 lut 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Ad:Ringo_Starr

"Ringo Starr w lipcu 2013" is nonsense (unless you have the time machine). W lipcu means in July (genitive form of lipiec - July).

Here [2], photo 'Ringo Starr and a fan backstage in Hamburg, July 2011a.jpg' was described as "Ringo Starr w lipcu 2011", because it WAS taken in July 2011. --WTM (dyskusja) 05:45, 25 lut 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Thanks my bad, it was simply an error in changing the date when I initially included the photo. It's now fixed. Cheers, Russavia ✉ 05:57, 25 lut 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Hey! Are you still interested to write a letter to Polish Sejm? I have already a sketch of it ready, but haven't heard anything from you. I am becoming a fan of Polandball, especially this episode is nice and funny, made my day, but unfortunatelly not everybody thinks the same. Anyhow, please do not revert the picture! In order to avoid problems with administration. Let somebody else do it. Greetings. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 13:25, 7 mar 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Hi Hortensja, thanks for the message. Let's get in touch with each other on email, and let's get this Sejm letter done. As to that image, I was asked by an editor to have it created to replace the deleted image from Commons for their WikiProject. I won't re-insert it, but will let that editor do it themselves. I will be in touch soon :) Cheers, Russavia ✉ 22:09, 9 mar 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Odp:Random act of kindness barnstar

What can I say? I was crying yesterday and I am crying right now. I hope the whole story will have a happy end and if not, let it be, I will stand by you. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 09:32, 17 kwi 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hello! I dedicated a small article about a traditional Dutch dish hutspot for you as a thank you for all you have done for me --Hortensja (dyskusja) 13:00, 30 kwi 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Witaj! Twoje głosy w wyborach do KA zostały skreślone, ponieważ nie spełniasz jeszcze wymagań do głosowania (potrzeba 500 nieusuniętych edycji w przestrzeni głównej). Pozdrawiam, MATEUSZ.NS _dyskusja 19:08, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

• Well, I've noticed Mateusz.ns is writing to you in Polish, so let me serve with a translation. Your votes have been crossed out because of your edit count; it seems you've got almost the amount needed to vote, but still - not enough (500 undeleted edits in main space). Regards, Grzegorz z Nyssy (dyskusja) 19:28, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST) In fact I hadn't checked your number of undeleted edits out before writing to you; I wasn't quite right then when saying "you've got almost the number". But nevermind, good luck on pl.wiki and anywhere else :) Grzegorz z Nyssy (dyskusja) 19:50, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST) [odpowiedz]

Thanks mate, appreciated, and you too :) Russavia ✉ 19:55, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hi guys, that's fine. I didn't realise it was 500 mainspace undeleted edits. There's no need for drama about this, strike the votes as required by the "rules" of the elections, and I am sure I'll have 500 edits for next time, so there shouldn't be a problem. Anyway, good luck to those I supported :) Cheers, Russavia ✉ 19:38, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Andrzej₁₉^@. 22:21, 12 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hello! I didn't know that you have already uploaded and categorised all the pictures from Kraków. It looks nice. You can add Commonscat to the article Juwenalia krakowskie. Each edit counts:-) Hortensja (dyskusja) 11:19, 14 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

I have almost forgotten. Lesson in wiki-Polish:-) Don't mix Lajkonik z wikipedian and administrator Lajsikonik , because of the possible conseqences. I warn you:-) Hortensja (dyskusja) 11:30, 14 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

LOL, I kinda see the similarity between the two. :)))) Russavia ✉ 10:21, 18 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

It is ready. You can, if you wish, illustrate the article and add Commons category. I am not an expert in biographies of politicians/diplomats and I do not know the exact vocabulary. There is very little information available about her, she has no decent biography in English and no decent biography in Polish. It makes it difficult, because I can not compare or complete informations. Greetings. Hortensja (dyskusja) 14:34, 18 wrz 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Andrzej₁₉^@. 10:07, 13 paź 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Why are you censoring Alan's statements? Marcgalrespons 20:06, 14 paź 2013 (CEST) OK, i get it, sry Marcgalrespons 21:53, 14 paź 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

No worries. :) Russavia ✉ 22:10, 14 paź 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hello! Please do not revert that description. Let it be as Mother Mary says:-) Greetings. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 10:18, 30 lis 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Hi Mother Mary, thanks for the message. Don't worry, I have no intention in reverting the change. Sorry for delay in replying, I've only just seen this message after re-visiting pl.wp. Hope all is well with you :) Russavia ✉ 06:53, 10 gru 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Thank you and may God's love be with you. Hortensja (dyskusja) 13:20, 10 gru 2013 (CET)[odpowiedz]

Odp:Louise Watkin

Hello Russavia! Of course, I will write her biography, but it will take more time, 2 up to 3 weeks, because firstly I must finish the article about potato sausage I am busy in my note book and it is almost ready, and secondly because I am not an expert in sport related subjects I will have to do some research and wiki-espionage:-) Greetings. --Hortensja (dyskusja) 18:39, 8 kwi 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

The biography of Louise Watkin is ready. I couldn't find any information about her swimming activities last year and currently. It looks like she stopped (temporarily of permanently) with swimming and that's a pity, because she is obviously talented. Nedops gave me a few good advices during writing the article. It was a "jump in at the deep end", because sport is not really my thing and I can't swim myself, despite my mother's efforts to teach me and my enthusiasm. Easter is coming, so I wish you a splendid Easter holiday. Hortensja (dyskusja) 12:17, 16 kwi 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Welcome. I see that you have added cool pictures from a trip to South Korea Francis and in addition two cool with the pope, where you just instantly improves mood. If you still have it let. You did not have to thank me for adding images to the article about the Pope. I waited a long time that someone gave some nice photos and also I myself wanted to add some but first I wrote to the authors of these photos of copyright, but end of it. I also thought that you are of Polish because I noticed that you have a page on Polish Wikipedia, and I wanted to write to you to Polish but I write in English for the first time from my work at Wikipedia to write to someone in another language. Yours sincerely.KamilQue ► 14:34, 18 sie 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

@KamilQue I am very pleased that you found the photos useful for articles on Polish Wikipedia. If there are any other subjects you need photos of, but are having trouble finding, feel free to drop me a line and I can see if I can help find them. Cheers, Russavia ✉ 09:26, 19 sie 2014 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Hey, please substitute {{ref}} with another template because at this moment it's suitable only for the deletion: it doesn't work and is no longer used. --ThePolish 22:38, 9 lis 2014 (CET)[odpowiedz]

User:The Polish thanks for letting me know. I undid this edit by you as if you look at the results, it has transcluded some sort of template with text and image, instead of the desired result you were looking for. I hope you can see it :)

But thanks for editing it, it reminds me I must get around to finishing it someday, it took me quite some time to do all the Polish names, etc. I was thinking it might make a nice list for here on pl.wp too. Cheers, Russavia ✉ 22:45, 9 lis 2014 (CET)[odpowiedz]