Wrong bishop

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

A wrong bishop in the situation of king, bishop, and rook pawn versus king

In a chess endgame, a wrong bishop is a bishop that would have been better placed on the opposite square color.^[1] This most commonly occurs with a bishop and one of its rook pawns, but it also occurs with a rook versus a bishop, a rook and one rook pawn versus a bishop, and possibly with a rook and one bishop pawn versus a bishop.

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

Rook versus bishop

V. Platov, 1925

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White wins because Black has the wrong bishop.

White wins in this position. The defender has the wrong bishop if it is on the same color as the corner where his king is confined. Black's bishop is on the wrong color of square for it to form a fortress in the corner (i.e. with the black king on the h8-square and the bishop on the g8- or h7-square). White wins:

1. Kf5! Kg8

2. Ra4!! The only way to win. If 2.Kg6? Kf8 and the black king is able to get out of the "dangerous corner" or "wrong corner" and head to a "safe corner" or "right corner" where he can set up the fortress.

2... Be1

3. Kg6 Kf8

4. Rf4+!, followed by 5. Re4, winning.^[2]

Rook pawn

There are some situations involving a rook pawn and the wrong bishop.

Bishop and rook pawn

Müller & Lamprecht

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White has the wrong bishop, draw with either side to move

In an endgame with a bishop and a rook pawn, the wrong bishop is one that does not control the promotion square of the pawn. This position is a draw with either side to move. Black simply keeps his king on the a8-, a7-, or b8-squares (or b7 if the pawn advances) to keep the pawn from promoting. A draw because of stalemate is also possible. If the bishop were on the other color it could force the black king out of the corner and the pawn could promote and win.^[3]

Rook and rook pawn versus bishop

Bernhard von Guretzky-Cornitz

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White wins, the bishop is on the wrong color.

A rook and a rook pawn always win against the wrong bishop, as in this position. The defender has the wrong bishop if it is the one on the same color as the pawn's promotion square. The winning procedure is to give up the pawn at the right time to get to a winning rook versus bishop endgame. If the bishop was on the other color, the defender may be able to form a fortress in the corner, as mentioned above.^[4]

Rook and bishop pawn versus bishop

de la Villa, diagram 13.19

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Black to move draws.

With a rook and a bishop pawn on the sixth rank versus a bishop, the bishop may be on the right color or the wrong color. In one case the rook and pawn win; in the other the bishop is able to draw. In this position Black is able to draw because his bishop is on the right color:

1... Be2

2. Kf4 Bc4

3. Kg5 Bd5!

4. Rc7 Ba2!

5. Kg6 Bb1+!

6. Kh6 Ba2!

7. Ra7 Bc4

and there is no way for White to make progress.^[5] This type of position was studied by Ercole del Rio around 1750.^[6]^[7] This case is similar to the case with a rook pawn (above), which also may be a draw.

Examples from games

Szabó vs. Botvinnik, 1952

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Position before 51...Rxa5!

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Position after 59...Bc4

In this 1952 game between László Szabó and World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik,^[8] Black was defending two pawns down – a position that would normally be a win for White. Botvinnik saw an opportunity to exchange his rook for a knight and two pawns and reach a drawn position (even without his pawn). The game continued:

51... Rxa5!

52. Nd7+ Bxd7

53. Rxa5 Bxg4

54. Ke3 Be6

55. Kf4 Bc4

56. Ra7 h5

57. Kg5 h4

58. Kxh4 Bb3

59. Kg5 Bc4

and reached the second position, which had been analyzed as a draw.

White was not able to make any progress. He promoted his pawn on move 76 and it was immediately captured by Black, resulting in a rook versus bishop endgame (see pawnless chess endings#Common pawnless endings (rook and minor pieces)) that was drawn two moves later.^[9]

Miladinovic vs. Beliavsky, 2001

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Black to move

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Position after 127.Bc5, draw

In this game^[10] between Igor Miladinović and Alexander Beliavsky, Black could have won by 99... Rxf3+, but instead played 99... gxf3?, reaching the theoretically-drawn position.

99... gxf3?

100. Bc5 Ke4

101. Kf2 Rc3

102. Ba7 Rc7

103. Bb6 Rc2+

104. Kf1 Rc6 (if 104...f2 then 105.Kg2! draws)

105. Ba7 Ra6

106. Bc5 Kf4

107. Bd4 Ra4

108. Bc5 Rc4

109. Ba7 Rb4

110. Bc5

The game was drawn on move 127.^[11]

Rook and pawn versus bishop and pawn

From Hawkins, p. 104

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Draw

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Black wins

In this type of position when the pawns are facing each other and blocked, the result often depends on which color the bishop is on. If the bishop is on the same color as its pawn, the rook almost always wins. If the bishop is on the color of the opposing pawn it has good drawing chances.^[12]

References

^ (Rosen 2003:61)
^ (Dvoretsky 2006:235, 366)
^ (Müller & Lamprecht 2001:96–100)
^ (Fine & Benko 2003:468–69)
^ (de la Villa 2008:219–21)
^ (Benko 2007:47–48)
^ (Giddins 2007:77)
^ Szabo vs. Botvinnik, 1952
^ (Giddins 2007:77)
^ Miladinovic vs. Beliavsky
^ (Makarov 2007:106–7)
^ (Hawkins 2012:90–93, 104)

Bibliography

Benko, Pal (2007), Pal Benko's Endgame Laboratory, Ishi Press, ISBN 978-0-923891-88-6
de la Villa, Jesús (2008), 100 Endgames You Must Know, New in Chess, ISBN 978-90-5691-244-4
Dvoretsky, Mark (2006), Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual (2nd ed.), Russell Enterprises, ISBN 1-888690-28-3
Fine, Reuben; Benko, Pal (2003), Basic Chess Endings (2nd ed.), McKay, ISBN 0-8129-3493-8
Giddins, Steve (2007), 101 Chess Endgame Tips, Gambit Publications, ISBN 978-1-904600-66-4
Hawkins, Jonathan (2012), Amateur to IM: Proven Ideas and Training Methods, Mongoose, ISBN 978-1-936277-40-7
Makarov, Marat (2007), The Endgame, Chess Stars, ISBN 978-954-8782-63-0
Müller, Karsten; Lamprecht, Frank (2001), Fundamental Chess Endings, Gambit Publications, ISBN 1-901983-53-6
Rosen, Bernd (2003), Chess Endgame Training, Gambit Publications, ISBN 978-1-904600-01-5

Fahrer / Team für die Suche eingeben: