A banner year, but it pales in comparison with the ambitions of WP:100K.--75.37.14.57 (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:100K should have focused on B-class or Good Articles. That number of featured articles was never realistic. Carcharoth (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice report, Marskell. The first four paragraphs could maybe be made more interesting with some links? You could link "Featured article process" for example, and you could link to full lists of FAs for 2005 and 2006 if they exist. You could also link "removals process", "featured topics", and you could link to the featured topics for "hurricane related coverage" (I actually make it four separate topics listed) and "Solar System coverage". Finally, you use the abbreviations FA and FAC - it would be worth spelling those out in full the first time you use them, and then sticking the abbreviation in brackets after that first use. Even with that, I regretfully have to Oppose Featured Signpost article status... :-) Carcharoth (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very droll :-) --kingboyk (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, I had meant to dab it all. Looks like Ral got to it. Marskell (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]