This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography: History This page is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography This page is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Trump raised-fist photographs#Requested move 15 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 07:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Visible presentation of misleading content

Canon EOS 7D Mark II (right) has a 3.0" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

Canon EOS R6 (right) has a 3.2" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

My Canon EOS R5 Mark II has a visibly larger LCD screen than my Canon EOS R6, but the infobox says otherwise.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru and Kicar2:-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could find a reliable source for the screen size, and alter it yourself. -Lopifalko (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am calling in the experts. I see 3.2" and 2.95" as the first two results. I think it has to be 3.3 if the R6 is 3.2.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page states 3.2. Can you turn the screens on and compare active screen sizes? Kicar2 (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I added was taken from the manufacturer's website. Under "specs" it says here: "LCD Screen [...] Monitor Size: 3.0-inch (screen aspect ratio of 3:2), 2.95 in./7.5cm diagonal (2.44 in./6.2cm width, 1.65 in./4.2cm height)". As I don't have this cutie right now, I can't even compare it to my R5. --D-Kuru (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear from the pictures how much bezel there is to each screen of the cameras mentioned here. The R6 and R5 Mark II fold out screens might look the same size, but have different sized bezels and so different sized LCDs. The 7D Mark II screen seems to have a very slim bezel. Kicar2 (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at Antonio Martinelli and assess it since being a photographer seems to be the primary claim being made for Martinelli's Wikipedia notability. The article apparently is a translation of fr:Antonio Martinelli, but it's creator/translator/primary contributor also might be a relative of Martinelli. The article has a bit of a promotional feel to it, but that could be due to it being a translation, and some of the sources appear to be weak. The article's formatting/layout also seems to be mimicking the French Wikipedia version word for word, which might not be the best way to do things here on English Wikipedia. Maybe all that's need is someone more familiar with BLP articles about photographers to look it over and clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up and trim whatever needs to be trimmed. For reference, the French Wikipedia article was created by the same person and it too never appears to have been assessed for Wikipedia notability. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Image, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Treats! has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]