Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mariah Carey

Welcome to the discussion page of the Mariah Carey WikiProject!

Great job guys

I have made many many a WP and this one by far got of the grown the quickest .....thanks to all involved and to our founder Peter for even thinking of all this. Ps Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Mariah Carey articles by quality statistics will be up soon ...will need someone to check it in a few days i guess.Moxy (talk) 04:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Projects pages

If you have any question on how it all works just ask. Add this to your watch list pls

WP pages
portal pages

Pages to make ...Would need to update "max=" to new total for its {{Random portal component}} on the portal main page.

  1. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected album/3
  2. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected article/3
  3. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected performance/3
  4. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected picture/3
  5. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected song/3
  1. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected album/4
  2. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected article/4
  3. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected performance/4
  4. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected picture/4
  5. Portal:Mariah Carey/Selected song/4

We could also make a new box for some Portal:Mariah Carey/Did you know? when we are ready.Moxy (talk) 06:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butterfly World Tour

PLEASE fix the article on MC's 1998 Butterfly World Tour. Parts of information are absolutley incorrect. Please read the Butterfly World Tour discussion page for more information!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Butterfly_World_Tour — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.62.134.121 (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Background sections

Seriously, the background section of "Boy (I Need You)" consists of 700 irrelevant words. It goes into more detail than the Charmbracelet article! It says that she won an award in 2000, stripped and threatened to commit suicide in 2001, and there are critical reviews for a movie and it says that her father died of cancer... how is any of this relevant to this song?! "Through the Rain", and pretty much every Mariah Carey GA, have the same problem. This has to stop. Pancake (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RSN

Team members I have raised a concern at WP:RSN about the two book sources used continuously for the articles, in here. Hope we can assess the copyvio and plagiarism concerns that I have raised. —IB [ Poke ] 14:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone subscribe to Billboard? I need to know some boxscore data for a tour.

Please ping me here or post on my user talk. Thanks.  — Calvin999 14:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article had a resurgence of traffic and IP edits as part of the #JusticeforGlitter campaign. This has led to inclusion of a lot of bare urls, questionable sources, questionable content, etc. I think members of the project should work on cleanup so that the article can retain its GA status (Ping: Petergriffin9901, Moxy, 11JORN).--NØ 14:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most viewed stub in this Wikiproject

Theme from Mahogany (Do You Know Where You're Going To) 3,259 108 Stub--Coin945 (talk) 14:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source question

I posted a question at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Argenson, Jim (2008), Mariah Carey Concert Tours about a source used in various Carey-related articles. Renata3 16:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Carey listed for FAR

I have nominated Mariah Carey for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ScarletViolet (talk • contribs) 00:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]