This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Commonwealth This page is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CommonwealthWikipedia:WikiProject CommonwealthTemplate:WikiProject CommonwealthCommonwealth

Archives

March 2008 Archive 1 (2008) Archive 2 (2009) Archive 3 (2010)

A vote to move Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom to Elizabeth II is being held at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. —what a crazy random happenstance 02:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I invite WikiProject Commonwealth members to signup to support a Proposed Commonwealth Games WikiProject. The Commonwealth Games series of articles are much in need of attention. The first task of this project would be to standardise article, template and category naming and to format all existing results and medal tables using Template:MedalistTable and Template:RankedMedalTable for example. Additionally an audit of the results is needed - as an example many of the swimming results show mm:ss and should show mm:ss.00 in the time column. Add your support here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Commonwealth Games. Yboy83 (talk) 11:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Though this proposal had enough endorsement to go ahead, no one stepped up to create it, so it has been archived as not going ahead. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning infoboxes at articles such as Prime Minister of Canada, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Prime Minister of Australia etc. GoodDay (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, someone has WP:PRODded the Commonwealth Winter Games article for deletion. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 09:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is presently a dipute going on at Talk:Monarchy of Canada regarding a particular sentence in the article. There are only two or three editors involved and progress seems, well... unlikely, at the moment. Some additional input would be appreciated. Cheers, --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 01:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, several maps of the British Empire have been nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 14.

70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am making here an appeal for help at Monarchy of Canada, where both more opinion and enforcement is needed before Hell breaks any more loose than it already has. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 20:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, {{Commonwealth military ranks}} has been nominated for deletion. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI {{Commonwealth portal}} has been nominated for deletion. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now replaced with {{portal|Commonwealth}}. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should WP:WikiProject British Empire be merged here? That project is inactive, and the topic is the historical predecessor and partial overlapping sister organization to the Commonwealth. The name might need to be expanded to WP:WikiProject Commonweath and British Empire.

I suggest a merge since that project is tagged as inactive, and because of the overlap and being historically related.

70.29.212.131 (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha... it's kind of funny considering that the Empire project was born from a similar suggestion. I don't believe it should be merged. There is plenty of room for both to operate. The problem with WP:WikiProject British Empire is that the topic is massive and a lot of the most dedicated editors to the subject never signed up. I think it could live again. --- MichiganCharms (talk) 22:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, on second thought, maybe a merger is for the best? The membership overlap is so high and the scope of this project has been expanded enough since the Empire project was launched that it could work. - MichiganCharms (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Strongly oppose. The two subjects aren't particularly related. The overlap in the membership of editors is primarily due to this project previously having been called 'WikiProject Commonwealth realms'. Under its current objective, to improve coverage of the Commonwealth itself, few of the editors listed above are actually active, as suggested by the irrelevance of the areas they've listed themselves as being interested in. Bastin 22:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I'd note that since the Commonwealth is, at it's core, an evolved form of the British Empire, there is still a lot of overlap there. --MichiganCharms (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of the WikiProjects are unrelated, with perhaps only articles related to the military history of the Commonwealth belonging to both. That is a very small subsection. Bastin 00:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose - The subjects aren't related; the Commonwealth is nothing like the British Empire. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. As others have pointed out, the two projects are different enough to make a merge seemingly unhelpful. It is true that currently the British Empire project doesn't seem to be very active, but I am going to join and see if I can gradually get it started up again and continue the good work that has already been done. Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 18:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Two diffrent related projects is not a good combo, the wikiproject does have some things going for it, I see some FA acrticles over there. It just needs new members is all - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This merge debate has been going on for two months now, seeing all I see are oppose consensus I wil lremove the merge tags now if nobody has issue with it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened an RfC on what to do with the date formatting across the entire series of biographies on Canada's governors general: Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#RfC on date format for GG bios. Input is requested so as to bring this issue to a resolution. Cheers. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 16:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, WikiProject Multi-sport events, which was set up on 8 October, currently intends to set up a Commonwealth Games taskforce under the project. As your WikiProject is highly related in this regard, we would love to hear your views and opinions on the matter. Cheers, ANGCHENRUI _WP:MSE♨ 10:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems to have passed the poll for creation at MSE. Does anyone want to help in creating this task force? (Perhaps it can be double flagged? {{WikiProject Commonwealth|Games=yes}} and {{WikiProject Multi-sport events|Commonwealth=yes}} 76.66.203.138 (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not the former. We can't have {{WikiProject Commonwealth|Games=yes}} and {{WikiProject Multi-sport events|Commonwealth=yes}} at the same time. Two taskforces that deal with the exact same topic? Nope. So just {{WikiProject Multi-sport events|Commonwealth=yes}}. ANGCHENRUI _WP:MSE♨ 08:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it does happen, just look at {{WPJAPAN}}, where several task forces are double flagged, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Japanese military history task force being {{WikiProject Japan|milhist=yes}} as well as {{WikiProject Military history|Japanese=yes}} The task force itself lies under WPMILHIST, but flagging occurs on both templates, the WPJAPAN template is optional, the WPMILHIST template is required for tagging articles. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 14:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Commonwealth of Nations is being proposed to be renamed. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 14:10, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...how does one delete his Username from the Members Template? GoodDay (talk) 06:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image File:EIIR-Canadian Parliament.jpg, which is listed as being within the scope of this project, has been tagged for deletion. The related discussion is here. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 14:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes were made to citations templates (such as {{citation}}, {{cite journal}}, {{cite web}}...). In addition to what was previously supported (bibcode, doi, jstor, isbn, ...), templates now support arXiv, ASIN, JFM, LCCN, MR, OL, OSTI, RFC, SSRN and Zbl. Before, you needed to place |id={{arxiv|0123.4567}} (or worse |url=http://arxiv.org/abs/0123.4567), now you can simply use |arxiv=0123.4567, likewise for |id={{JSTOR|0123456789}} and |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/0123456789 → |jstor=0123456789.

The full list of supported identifiers is given here (with dummy values):

• {{cite journal |author=John Smith |year=2000 |title=How to Put Things into Other Things |journal=Journal of Foobar |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=3–4 |arxiv=0123456789 |asin=0123456789 |bibcode=0123456789 |doi=0123456789 |jfm=0123456789 |jstor=0123456789 |lccn=0123456789 |isbn=0123456789 |issn=0123456789 |mr=0123456789 |oclc=0123456789 |ol=0123456789 |osti=0123456789 |rfc=0123456789 |pmc=0123456789 |pmid=0123456789 |ssrn=0123456789 |zbl=0123456789 |id={{para|id|____}} }}

Obviously not all citations needs all parameters, but this streamlines the most popular ones and gives both better metadata and better appearances when printed. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm coming here with an appeal for some outside input at Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal, which falls within the scope of this project. There seems to be a few problems, but proper resolution of them is being hampered by a disruptive anonymous editor who persistently reverts and refuses to engage in discussion at the talk page. I don't want to here promote any one side of the disputes; I would just like more eyes on the page and/or input in the discussions. Cheers. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 15:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC has been started at Talk:Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal#Article arrangement. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 17:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how much passion this will envoke, but I have recently created an article on a Commonwealth Games sports-person who was awarded a medal. I have now been told that the article is up for deletion as the Commonwealth Games is not a major international competition and therefore medal holders can be deleted unless they have 'done something else'. The argument hangs on the Commenwelalth Games not being a 'major international'. Opinion is heavily requested. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Anglo-African#Proposed move to British in Africa. Helen (talk) 17:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Commonwealth ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Commonwealth Games Federation Logo.svg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 08:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:British Empire Games 1950 Silver Medal.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 07:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if editors can create the following articles and also work on improving/expanding other articles in the series?

• 1955 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• 1956 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• 1962 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• 1964 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• 1965 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• January 1966 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference
• September 1966 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference

Imperial Preference (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have an interesting image of a conference of 1984 of Commonwealth Nations. Many politicians of various nations can be found here... Please help identify them. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See talk:British Empire in World War II on whether this is the Commonwealth or Empire -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 03:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Royal Assent to be moved to Royal assent. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Order of Merit to be moved to Order of Merit (Commonwealth realm). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:14, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Would you consider the Colonial and then the Imperial Conferences come under the scope of this project? It's not clear to me, as the Commonwealth as such came into existence in 1926, but those conferences go back to 1887. Schwede66 21:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for British Empire in World War II to be moved to Military History of the British Empire in World War II. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for British Empire in World War II to be moved to something else. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for British Royal Family to be moved to British royal family. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Can someone please reorganise the articles for the Ambassadors & High Commissioners for the following countries?;

Fiji, The Gambia, Ireland,the Maldives, Pakistan, South Africa, and Zimbabwe.

Ambassadors were accredited from these countries until Fiji, Pakistan, and South Africa all returned to their memberships of the Commonwealth.

The Gambia, Ireland, the Maldives, and Zimbabwe were represented by High Commissioners until their withdrawal from the Commonwealth in 2013, 1949, 2016, and 2003 respectively, when Ambassadors have since been accredited to these 4 countries.

Of course, the categories for Ambassadors & High Commissioners in relation to all of those countries need to be merged, and the articles retitled to match the categories. - (119.224.80.18 (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Organizations" "Sports" "Pacific islanders"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 11:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Commonwealth Stadium (Edmonton) to be moved to Commonwealth Stadium. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

User:NadirAli and I have had a disagreement about whether the Dominion of Pakistan was a part of the British Empire, and as a result which wikiprojects it should be placed in, see Talk:Dominion of Pakistan#British Empire. The same issue applies to the Dominion of India and possibly to other articles in Category:Former Commonwealth realms. Advice please. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for British High Commission, Abuja to be moved to British High Commission Abuja. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Monarchy of the United Kingdom to be moved to British Monarchy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Can someone please create articles for each country titled '(Name of country) and the Commonwealth of Nations'?

There is one which is titled Zimbabwe and the Commonwealth of Nations.

Other countries that articles should include are The Gambia and the Commmonwealth of Nations, The Maldives and the Commonwealth of Nations, The Republic of Ireland and the Commonwealth of Nations, and South Sudan and the Commonwealth of Nations. - (101.98.104.241 (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Ghana (Commonwealth realm) to be moved to Dominion of Ghana. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I have started a discussion here regarding the necessity of a large number of templates related to sports events (including the Commonwealth Games), and as it is in this project's purview I am looking for opinions. Please join in the conversation. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   10:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Elizabeth II to be moved to Queen Elizabeth II. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II to be moved to Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Can someone please create articles that link to [[1]], so that there are articles about each country's relationship to the Commonwealth? - (101.98.104.241 (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC))[reply]

There is an open Request for Comment at Talk:Monarchy_of_Australia#Request_for_comment_on_terms on whether Queen Elizabeth II should be described as the monarch or the head of state. One term is undisputed, the other not so much. --Pete (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The options of using both terms in the article is also being discussed, as well. GoodDay (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wowsers, I thought this WikiProject became dormant years ago, along with Wikipedia:WikiProject British Empire. -- GoodDay (talk) 05:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Flag of the Governor General of Canada to be moved to Flag of the governor general of Canada. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I have nominated British Empire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Quality posts here (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 'Embassy of The Gambia, London' needs to be retitled 'High Commission of The Gambia, London, as The Gambia returned to its membership of the Commonwealth on 8 February 2018. - (124.197.55.28 (talk) 04:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC))[reply]

I have nominated Royal assent for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 18:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Commonwealth Stadium (Edmonton) to be moved to Commonwealth Stadium. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for British Empire to be moved to History of the British Empire. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Template:Use Commonwealth English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. - - mathmitch7 ^{(talk/contribs)} 20:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Order in Council to be moved to Order in council. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Order in Council to be moved to Order in council. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A discussion is taking place at Australia's notice board, which relates to describing the role of governors general. Also a discussion on whether or not, Australian state governors are heads of state is ocurring. Input would be welcomed. GoodDay (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Crown to be moved to British Crown. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Monarchy of Barbados to be moved to Queen of Barbados. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

An RM is open at Queen of Nigeria. Please comment there to generate a clear consensus. Peter Ormond 💬 05:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Monarchy of the United Kingdom for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently created an article on Take-note Debates, focussing primarily on the federal Canadian Parliament, with some comments on the British Parliament. I don't know if there are similar provisions for Take-note debates in other Commonwealth parliaments? Would be great if editors with knowledge of other Commonwealth Parliaments could take a look at the article and add to it. Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Queen of the Gambia to be moved to Monarchy of the Gambia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Queen of Malta to be moved to Monarchy of Malta. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Queen of Mauritius to be moved to Monarchy of Mauritius. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A move discussion about many articles is open at Talk:Queen of Ghana#Requested move 7 June 2022. Please comment there to generate a clear consensus. Thanks. Peter Ormond 💬 08:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Coronation of the British monarch for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An example Monarchy of the Bahamas page. The section heading should read only "The crown and its aspects", not "The Bahamian crown and its aspects". We already know which crown it is (by the article title), so why repeat it in a section heading? GoodDay (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Explained at User talk:Peter Ormond. Peter Ormond 💬 20:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just an observation. I've looked through the primary & secondary residences of governors-general, across the 14 realms that have them. I've noticed that only Canada lists the monarch (along with the governor general) as an official resident. But the monarch isn't listed in the other non-UK countries' viceregal residences, which show 'only' the governor-general as an official resident. GoodDay (talk) 04:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sri Lankan High Commissioner to India to be moved to List of High Commissioners of Sri Lanka to India. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Commonwealth realm to be moved to Commonwealth Realm. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

I have nominated Elizabeth II for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. John (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) to be moved to Princess Charlotte of Wales. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals/Archive 7#Deprecated language in citations for UK honours about whether citations should be updated to today's language, eg changing the 1980 "For service to the disabled." to "For service to disabled people." Members of this Wikiproject may have a view: please comment there. PamD 07:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 06:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Charles III to be moved to Charles III of the United Kingdom. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 10:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Elizabeth II to be moved to Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of High Commissioners of the United Kingdom to Australia to be moved to List of high commissioners of the United Kingdom to Australia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Elizabeth II to be moved to Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) to be moved to Princess Charlotte of Wales. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

An editor has requested that Guayana Esequiba be moved to Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. --WMrapids (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has requested that 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis be moved to 2023 Guyana–Venezuela crisis, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion.--WMrapids (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Tory to be moved to Toryism. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Monarchies in the Americas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, would welcome input at this discussion. -- GoodDay (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Monarchy of Australia to be moved to Monarch of Australia. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Input is welcome at Talk:Order of Grenada#Monarch as sovereign of order. Peter Ormond 💬 21:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#MOS:POSTNOM for discussion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan da Cunha has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:16, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]