Can someone explain why I can't use Flikr image with "Noncommercial" attribute? Wikipedia is free, isn't it? user:Ypcyc —Preceding comment was added at 12:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia text and images are supposed to be free for both commercial and non-commercial use. So a "non-commercial use only" image would not be completely free. --Timeshifter (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is crap? Why does it have to be available for commercial use on wikipedia? Can't we just note the same licence as the flickr pic and then it stops people from using it for commercial use? --Nzhamstar (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create this policy. It was discussed in detail years ago. I agree with it though now. It allows Wikipedia pages to be copied anywhere without complications. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:18, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the current policy at all. Wikipedia should be allowing itself the benefits of using non-commercial media. By not doing so, although it assures a convenience for commercial companies, Wikipedia creates no benefit whatever for itself. If this policy were repealed, the commercial companies would be well able to work around the encumbrance that some of the media is foreclosed to them. I need hardly tell you that loads of good media is around today, restricted to non-commercial uses, that would certainly enhance Wikipedia and could be used at Wikipedia right now except for this meritless policy. -- Seanwal111111 (talk) 23:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not really the place to discuss this. You can try one of the Village Pumps if you want to discuss changing policies. --Timeshifter (talk) 04:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by a Village Pump. Yesterday I spent time at Flickr searching for a suitable Creative Commons image for an article at Wikipedia, only to discover later that use of the image was prohibited by Wikipedia policy. If this is not the right forum to complain about that policy, I don't know what is. Anyway, I'd appreciate a pointer to a statement at Wikipedia that tries to defend the policy. I regard the policy as quite indefensible. -- Seanwal111111 (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the sidebar search to find the village pumps. Search also for image guidelines. --Timeshifter (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone to the page describing the policy that mandated that Wikipedia images must be available for commercial use as well. As it seems very relevant to this article. hAl (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the policy is described here: WP:Image copyright tags hAl (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is supposed to be an upload page, isn't it? So where are the 'browse...' button, the 'upload' button, the drop-down menus e.t.c.? --The Machine (talk) 18:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That link goes to Wikimedia Commons. I don't have an account there; and before you say, "Create one, then," I thought the whole point of this page was that it was for uploading images found on Flickr to Wikipedia. Am I wrong in that assumption? --The Machine (talk) 16:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Special:MergeAccount and your account will become usable on the Wikimedia Commons as well. It's much better to upload free images to the Wikimedia Commons because then Wikipedias in any language can use the images.

By the way, the link I gave you before was not ideal. [2] is what you want. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 01:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So is it possible to upload Flickr content to Wikipedia, rather than to Commons? Qqqqqq (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts on this? Qqqqqq (talk) 19:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all fair use files must be uploaded to Wikipedia and not to the Commons. Use [3] or a more specific upload form. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible (via Special:Upload), but discouraged. Stifle (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is stupid. Commons is annoying, and it takes twice as long to deal with all the crap uploading images there. Why does this not link to a wikipedia upload form? - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 00:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to be a user on Flickr, and I realize that Flickr does not yet have the public domain option for users unless they are affilated with the commons, which are museums who have accounts. BoL (Talk) 03:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm confused, your point is? —Giggy 03:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the link in the original comment in this section. Thanks for posting it! It is a great place to find public domain images. I have linked to it from other pages listing free image resources. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:18, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still no public domain license on Flickr... --Subfader (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a public domain license on Flickr now, finally! Flickr PD uses https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/--FeralOink (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What use is the main section on the page, below the "Go to Commons" banner? Users can't actually upload from here, and Commons has its own version of the main info section. It raises maintenance issues and possible contradiction (besides confusingly distracting from the Go to Commons message) to have it here as well - so what's the point? Rd232 ^talk 12:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a similar thing for Panoramio? --^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 02:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded "File:Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln.jpg" from Flickr. I had to upload it to Wikipedia instead of Commons because the subject of the photo requires a fair-use exception. However, the Flickr photo itself is free. How do I get an admin to validate the Flickr license like is done automatically on Commons in case the Flickr photo disappears one day? Thanks. —UncleDouggie (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When we upload an image from Flickr to Wikipedia instead of Commons, should the license be verified (Some Rights Reserved) the same way we do when we upload to Commons? Novice7 ^(Talk) 16:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What if an image was already put on wikipedia when the license was acceptable but then the license was changed? Would it be able to be proved one way or the other? Daniel Christensen (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't CC-BY-ND be used if the image is not altered? Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 18:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can we upload a screenshot of Flickr? Omkar1234 (talk) 07:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are two images on Flickr of historical advertisements of the girdles Playtex became well-known for in the mid-1900s.[4][5]

They both claim to have free licenses we would accept, but I find it hard to believe that an advertisement would be available under a free license. Do we just trust Flickr to have it right? And does anyone know about any specific rules to ads? Corporate 02:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page needs updating to reflect Flickr's redesign? They no longer seem to use the icons that we reproduce here, instead summarizing the license in text. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 07:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There are additional options no longer covered as the article stands. CoffeeGiraffe (talk) 19:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page says: "This guidance only applies to uploading a work found on Flickr created by someone else (not you)."

I have a Flickr account and an account on commons. It seems crazy to upload everything twice. Is there a way to upload my Flickr photos into my commons account? Lies Van Rompaey (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, recover the photo used in enwiki and uploaded from Flickr photo that has Public Domain Copyright

1)https://www.flickr.com/photos/148083379@N08/43103520695/in/dateposted-public/

2)https://www.flickr.com/photos/157145480@N04/41541966735/in/photolist-28TsDzL-29YXWzD-29YXWDB-28EUNZV-28XvxTf-LdWoWr-28Q5qtN-MVviTs-29stmuS-8yhBz3-26hVrpM Sry88 (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The images in question appear to be Flickr-washed; one is clearly scraped from Facebook. Both images were deleted as copyright violations. See the logs for File:Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul,WRTA.png and File:Professor Doctor Thitiporn Rangsitpol Suwatanapongched,Sukavich Rangsitpol ‘s Daughter.jpeg. —C.Fred (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I found some images in Flickr that are "all copyright reversed" and I want to use them in Wikipedia. What are the possible ways to upload them to Wikipedia. If geting permission from the owner is the answer then what are the steps to get permission and then prove to Wikipedia that the owner has allowed me to use his own work in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance --SharabSalam (talk) 10:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, after a break of little time on Wikipedia (RL got in the way). I’ve been getting back into the hobby/work and more active and have noticed a lot more images imported from Flickr being used since returning to more active participation. After searching various talk pages, I can’t find the answers to several questions:

• 1) Is there a precedent for using pictures of a subject from Commons vs from Flickr. I’ve noticed some pages using a Flickr-imported image in the infobox despite already uploaded Commons images. It would seem that if Image A (Commons) and Image B (Flickr) both show the subject equally well and are equally relevant to the article, if Image A is from Commons that it should be used in higher priority than/in replace of Image B from Flickr.

• 1A) I haven’t used Flickr in a long time but I remember the creator can change the license. If that is still an option on Flickr, that seems to be an added reason to have a precedent/policy to select images from Commons before Flickr and if no Commons image of the subject is available than used Flickr and other outside sources to find licensed pics.

I look forward to hearing thoughts, thanks. --Bhockey10 (talk) 20:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images are sometimes tagged with "All rights reserved" but when you scroll down it shows the Viewing Privacy to be on "Public viewing" for upload. Does this mean we can license it under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) because I've seen images on commons that have done this. Is this allowed? PreserveOurHistory (talk) 07:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I tried sharing a video from Flickr but I get an error – "File extension ".jpg" does not match the detected MIME type of the file (video/x-m4v)."

How could I share a video from Flickr? This first one was just a test, but can't figure out how to share good Flickr videos on Wikimedia. Learn new things in 2024 (talk) 01:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]