User:Cyclonenim

   run at Sun Jul 13 15:20:38 2008 GMT

   Category talk:         1
   Category:              27
   Mainspace              1697
   Portal:                38
   Talk:                  1062
   Template:              38
   User talk:             585
   User:                  367
   Wikipedia talk:        32
   Wikipedia:             523
   avg edits per page     1.89
   earliest               20:20, 6 June 2006
   number of unique pages 2315
   total                  4370

   2006/6  4
   2006/7  2
   2006/8  22
   2006/9  0
   2006/10 10
   2006/11 27
   2006/12 9
   2007/1  10
   2007/2  4
   2007/3  0
   2007/4  0
   2007/5  36
   2007/6  0
   2007/7  1
   2007/8  1
   2007/9  9
   2007/10 0
   2007/11 0
   2007/12 27
   2008/1  430
   2008/2  175
   2008/3  49
   2008/4  671
   2008/5  2133
   2008/6  558
   2008/7  192

   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)

               Mainspace
   85 [2]Zygomycosis
   50 [3]Teardrop (band)
   42 [4]Subarachnoid hemorrhage
   38 [5]S�zary's disease
   35 [6]Chondrocalcinosis
   29 [7]Hypereosinophilic syndrome
   25 [8]Tolosa-Hunt syndrome
   24 [9]Adie syndrome
   22 [10]Ventricular hypertrophy
   20 [11]Alice in Wonderland syndrome
   18 [12]Pectus excavatum
   16 [13]Stroke
   15 [14]Trichlormethiazide
   15 [15]Kick (soft drink)
   15 [16]Rocket propellant

                        Talk:
   44 [17]Subarachnoid hemorrhage
   15 [18]Zygomycosis
   12 [19]Pectus excavatum
   11 [20]Subcutaneous emphysema
   8  [21]Physical therapy
   7  [22]Oil price increases since 2003
   7  [23]Stroke
   6  [24]Headache
   5  [25]Main Page
   5  [26]Ascending cholangitis
   5  [27]Lymphatic system
   5  [28]Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
   5  [29]Long-term effects of alcohol
   4  [30]2007-2008 Writers Guild of America strike
   4  [31]Rheumatoid arthritis

                  Category:
   3 [32]FA-Class neurology articles
   3 [33]Start-Class neurology articles
   2 [34]Stub-Class neurology articles
   2 [35]B-Class neurology articles
   2 [36]FL-Class neurology articles
   2 [37]Low-importance neurology articles
   2 [38]Unassessed-Class neurology articles
   2 [39]A-Class neurology articles

                    Portal:
   14 [40]Medicine/Did you know archive
   9  [41]Medicine/Did you know
   4  [42]Medicine/Selected article candidates
   4  [43]Medicine/Things you can do
   3  [44]Medicine/WikiProjects
   2  [45]Medicine/Quotes archive
   2  [46]Medicine/Selected article/49, 2007

           Template:
   8 [47]WikiProject Neurology
   6 [48]User Good Articles2
   5 [49]Vandalism information
   4 [50]WPN Navigation
   2 [51]RD-med
   2 [52]User Good Articles
   2 [53]Neurotrauma

                    User:
   240 [54]Cyclonenim
   21  [55]Cyclonenim/Sandbox
   20  [56]Cyclonenim/monobook.js
   10  [57]Cyclonenim/Icons
   8   [58]Pedro/Mentoring
   7   [59]Cyclonenim/Contributions/Archive2
   6   [60]Cyclonenim/Status
   5   [61]Cyclonenim/NavBox
   5   [62]Cyclonenim/huggle.css
   4   [63]Cyclonenim/Guestbook
   3   [64]Mdebets
   3   [65]Cyclonenim/RfA questions
   3   [66]Cyclonenim/QuiFriends
   2   [67]CycloneNimrod
   2   [68]AmiDaniel/VP/Approval

         User talk:
   66 [69]Cyclonenim
   33 [70]Delldot
   31 [71]Jfdwolff
   15 [72]KC Panchal
   12 [73]Stevenfruitsmaak
   9  [74]Ged3000
   8  [75]Stepshep
   8  [76]Pozilla
   8  [77]NCurse
   7  [78]Steve Crossin
   7  [79]Travellingcari
   6  [80]Pedro
   5  [81]Elncid
   4  [82]PeeJay2K3
   4  [83]J.delanoy

                        Wikipedia:
   150 [84]Reference desk/Science
   34  [85]Administrator intervention against vandalism
   18  [86]WikiProject Neurology
   14  [87]WikiProject Neurology/List of articles
   14  [88]Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim
   13  [89]WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Week
   12  [90]Bot requests
   11  [91]Requests for adminship/Travellingcari
   9   [92]Requests for adminship/PeeJay2K3 (2)
   7   [93]WikiProject Medicine/Participants
   7   [94]Miscellany for deletion
   6   [95]Sandbox
   6   [96]Requests for adminship/Aitias 2
   5   [97]Requests for adminship/Slp1
   5   [98]Requests for adminship/Jbmurray

                      Wikipedia talk:
   10 [99]Requests for adminship
   8  [100]WikiProject Neurology
   3  [101]Reference desk
   3  [102]About
   2  [103]WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Week

   If there were any problems, please [104]email Interiot or post at
   [105]User talk:Interiot.

• The edit count was retrieved from this link at 15:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC).

1. This user appears to need more training in the Wikipedia field. He seems confused and unready.--I Am The Great Editor in Chief (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   • This from an editor who has been with us for less than a month! MSGJ (talk) 16:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Honestly, it really does not matter how old an account is as long as it is not like 5 days. I admit that TGEIC's comment leaves something to be desired but Ad hominem oppose badgers are not the answer. -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 16:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Agreed. Ad hominem responses has no place here, even to flimsy arguments. - Mailer Diablo 16:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Please note the previous RfA from this editor that was closed per WP:NOTNOW by the candidate. Many thanks, Gazimoff ^Write_Read 16:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Struck after xenocidic's supplemental information about the RfA not being closed by the candidate and not appearing to be transcluded. Gazimoff ^Write_Read 17:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment: Confused about what? And I don't see how time per se is a factor--some people are quick learners. Cosmic Latte (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   • Comment. I haven't decided which way to go on this candidate yet, but this is clearly a bad-faith oppose, based upon Cycloneim's NOTNOW close comment on the !voter's RfA. S. Dean Jameson 16:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   That RFA is not closed and in fact doesn't appear to have ever been transcluded. –xenocidic (talk) 16:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My feeling is that the oppose vote by User:The Great Editor In Chief should struck down. The editor has been engaged in severely disruptive behavior in his short time on WP, he is now indef blocked and even his own talk page has been protected to disallow him further access. Basically a functional equivalent of a banned user. See the details at User talk:The Great Editor In Chief. Nsk92 (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a note, we'll have to leave it up to the crats to determine an appropriate weighting. I would also support the whole exchange being transplanted over here, leaving just his vote and my note. –xeno (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are probably right. Upon reflection, I also think it is a good idea to move the entire exchange regarding his vote here and to leave it to closing bureaucrats to deal with it. Also, a note to those who will look at his talk page: please check his block log as well. Initially that user was indef blocked for an inappropriate user name and then the block was modified to an indef block for disruption (the talk page does not make that very clear). Nsk92 (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, see above. –xeno (talk) 18:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not strike out any vote. Mark it so that for a deciding bureaucrat can decide. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]