Oregon Portal Collaboration	About Us Maintenance Participants Our Blog Member activity DYKs Awards
Main Talk	Recent Talk Recent Changes Non-Article	Subprojects Assessment Featured Content Popular Articles Templates & Infoboxes Reference Desk

Archives

March 2006–December 2006 May 2006–September 2006 May 2006–October 2007 November 2007–January 2008 January 2008–March 2008 March 2008–May 2008 May 2008–August 2008 September 2008–November 2008 November 2008–January 2009 January 2009–April 2009 April 2009–August 2009 September 2009–December 2009 December 2009–March 2010 March 2010–August 2010 August 2010–January 2011 January 2011–June 2011 June 2011–October 2011 October 2011–March 2012 March 2012–June 2012 July 2012–December 2012 January 2013–October 2013 October 2013–June 2014 June 2014–January 2015 January 2015–November 2015 November 2015–March 2016 March 2016–September 2016 September 2016–September 2017 September 2017 – January 2019 January 2019 – July 2020 June 2020 – May 2021

This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present.

Teammates, can I get experienced Wiki-Oregon editors to assess new Frederick Prigg article? Prigg was pioneer physician and pharmacist in 1840s. He opened the first commercial drug store in the Oregon County. He also served as Secretary for the Provisional Government of Oregon, a position that eventually became the Oregon Secretary of State … our second highest state office today. The article’s DYK nomination is approved so hook will be published on Wikipedia’s main page sometime soon ... not sure when. I’d really like someone from WikiProject Oregon to do assessment before DYK appears on main page. Thanks! Orygun (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm avoiding my GIS homework by poking my nose in here: Talk:List of cities in Oregon#Proposed merge of List of cities and unincorporated communities in Oregon with List of cities in Oregon. Does anybody think we still need two articles or are we just being stubborn? I haven't looked at either to see what they even look like now. Is there a valid objection besides WP:IDON'TLIKEIT? Is there a reason to keep besides Valfontis likes it? @Ipoellet? @EncMstr? Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 05:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon seems to be the only state that has a combined list like this. While an index is useful, it is probably more confusing for readers than just maintaining the existing cities list and CDP list. The cities list definitely needs to stay separate to match with the other 49 states, while the unincorporated places can have their own list similar to Washington's. SounderBruce 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon is doing the right thing by combining carrots and potatoes and calling them all vegetables. The cities which have not combined them are not doing the reader a favor. It makes them have to look in two places instead of one. They are more likely to be surprised by the arbitrarily imposed distinction. —EncMstr (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporation is an important distinction, as it (at least in the Northwest; other states are weird) determines whether you have another layer of government and what services you can receive. An unincorporated community is under direct county rule and has limited representation and independence. Incorporated cities and towns have firm names and recorded histories; unincorporated communities may have been named by the Census Bureau (in the case of CDPs) or have no real name, and hardly enough history to warrant an article under GNG. An equivalent to List of populated places in Oregon (a better name for the combined list) would be an appropriate thing to have for all states as a supplement to the lists that are separated by incorporated/unincorporated status. SounderBruce 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat related, but I feel like something like Kansas City, Oregon ought to not have an article of its own. It probably doesn't meet NGEO. Graywalls (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's been some pushback against having articles about small communities and quite a bit of damage (and no cleanup afterward, usually) has been done by folks not doing WP:BEFORE. (I don't necessarily agree with the current state of NGEO, but that's what we have right now.) Have you done any checking? Kansas City might be notable. I'll do my usual recon and try to spruce it up. Valfontis (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hampton Lumber's smiley face forest in fall foliage, near Willamina Oregon

Perfect time of year for the forest. It might actually stand up as an article given the number of press mentions. Or create something for Hampton Lumber, which is part of a few historic railways that have articles. tedder (talk) 00:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently a page move request that I opened there about renaming a few MAX stations' names for accessibility. I would appreciate people here to leave their thoughts there. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:35, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wilsonville, Oregon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All, I have addressed the lack of more recent news and other clean-up items, but if someone could do a copy edit to clean anything up, that would be appreciated. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some clean up on the citations, but the text could still use a once-over. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Portland Firefighters Park new user from the David Campbell Memorial Association trying to change the name of the article in a crude editing way. I'm 3000 miles away, maybe a local might bring something to the discussion.Naraht (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]