Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC

Two cases are currently open. The Committee opened or closed no cases during the week.

This week, further on-wiki evidence in excess of 4,000 words (~38kb) was submitted, while several proposals were also made in the workshop. Evidence submissions came to a close yesterday.

During the week, one party made several proposals in the workshop. Drafter Kirill Lokshin has not yet submitted a proposed decision on-wiki for arbitrators to vote on.

Today, a request for comment on the Wikipedia:Audit Subcommittee (AUSC) was opened by the Committee. AUSC is a subcommittee of the Arbitration Committee which should review and act upon concerns received by the community about CheckUser and Oversight activities. The Community has been invited to comment on AUSC, and the effectiveness of AUSC to date (if any).

Comments have also been invited about ongoing Community representation in AUSC. Currently, AUSC consists of three arbitrators and three community representatives elected by the Community. The Committee is considering a suggestion to abandon the election method in favour of the system that was used to appoint CheckUsers and Oversighters last year (see Signpost coverage from 16 August 2010, 23 August 2010 and 6 September 2010). A suggestion to appoint standby representatives is also being considered.

← Previous "Arbitration report"

Next "Arbitration report" →

In this issue

31 January 2011 (all comments)

News and notes

In the news

The Science Hall of Fame

WikiProject report

Features and admins

Arbitration report

Technology report

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

No comments yet. Yours could be the first!