This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 06:51, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

"Pseudowallerian" is a nice term which gets zero google hits. Delete. Sjakkalle 11:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nomination since it is a real term. BTW what is the difference between "Pseudowallerian" and "Wallerian"? Sjakkalle 06:30, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's a term used in neuroscience. I wouldn't expect to find many google hits. See here and here. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:26, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and admire Tony's knowledge of neuroscience. Kappa 15:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Actually I just looked it up on pubmed. Anybody can play at being a brain surgeon online. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:13, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Thanks Tony for the knowledge. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep needs expansion though. Klonimus 19:59, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and list as needing expansion.Capitalistroadster 22:17, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. Valid neuroscience topic. Megan1967 04:00, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.