The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ghislaine Maxwell (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template has nothing to offer but a list of her relatives, which are already included in the main article's infobox, and a single charity, which is discussed in the body of the main article. I think it serves no purpose in terms of grouping related articles and could possibly be deleted. Keivan.f^Talk 22:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Linguistic groups of the constitutionally recognised official languages of India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Can't see any reason for this to exist except an urge to link everything everywhere. PepperBeast (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Womens Rugby Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Boxing2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Boxing at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canoeing2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Diving2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Diving at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Equestrian2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fencing at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Judo2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Judo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting2004Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting2008Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Synchronizedswimming1992Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Table tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Taekwondo2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Taekwondo at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Weightlifting at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Wrestling2012Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Wrestling at the 2016 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All are no longer used as they have been substituted on the articles of relevance as single-use templates. No longer needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Literatures of the Indian constitutionally recognised official languages (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not sure what t he point of this template is, and a particular author has been inserting it into articles that already have the perfectly adequate Indian literature template. PepperBeast (talk) 13:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree that there's no need to have one template for the literatures of India and another just for those that are in the official languages. Whether a given language happens to have been included in the 8th schedule of the constitution isn't relevant here. – Uanfala (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).