The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Afghanistan national football team results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused following page merges, see Afghanistan national football team results. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ATC_code_C02 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ATC_code_J05 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ATC_code_L01 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ATC_code_P01 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Miss_Chile_winners_in_the_Big_Four_pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Miss_Canada_winners_in_the_Big_Four_pageants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lists of music by Ferruccio Busoni (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant navigation to Template:Ferruccio Busoni. the nice thing about using the footer/navbox for navigation is that it leaves more room for right-floating content like images, infoboxes, etc. Frietjes (talk) 21:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Central Coast LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Central Highlands LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Circular Head LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Clarence City LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Derwent Valley LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Devonport City LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Dorset LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Flinders LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:George Town LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Glamorgan-Spring Bay LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Glenorchy City LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Hobart City LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Huon Valley LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Latrobe LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Launceston City LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Meander Valley LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Sorell LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Southern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tasman LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Waratah-Wynyard LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:West Coast LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:West Tamar LGA InteractiveMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. These map templates have been replaced in relevant articles by calls to map data stored in individual subpages. For example, {{Sorell LGA InteractiveMap}} has been replaced in Sorell Council by a call to Wikipedia:Map data/Australian LGAs/Tasmania/Sorell. As such, these LGA map templates are no longer used and have no prospect of future use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. All unneeded maps. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95, I think you forgot to add Template:Circular Head LGA InteractiveMap, Template:George Town LGA InteractiveMap, and Template:Meander Valley LGA InteractiveMap to the batch when you merged the nominations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strange. Something went wrong with my text sorting. Fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unrelated to the nom but to the example given, shouldn't pages like Wikipedia:Map data/Australian LGAs/Tasmania/Sorell be changed in the content model to json (after moving the doc to the /doc)? Is there any issue which would prevent doing that? Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Waterbodies of Connecticut (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Appears to have been replaced by better templates, including {{Coastal waterbodies of Connecticut}} and {{Connecticut River}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the Connecticut River is not the same as the state of Connecticut, which is not entirely within its watershed. Do you mean {{Rivers of Connecticut}} and {{Connecticut lakes and ponds}} ? -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 04:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Weeks of Ordinary Time (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiBlame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no incoming links. Does not appear to be a subst only template either. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FAC2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per Wikipedia talk:Featured article review#Worth giving a periodic check?, this is unused and has been obsolete for years. Hog Farm _Talk 16:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just like the templates associated with Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Category:Wikipedia featured article review candidates (closed) and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 1#Category:Wikipedia featured article removal candidates, this is another template that is no longer needed, since Template:Article history was developed in 2008. See Taming talk page clutter and User:Maralia/FA templates (Maralia helped enormously in the effort when User:Gimmetrow and I built the Article milestones on Every Single FA). This particular one was created in 2005 by an editor who didn't really understand how the FAC templates should work, before we had frequent multiple nominations, and was trying to set up a second FAC nomination for the same article; it has never been widely used. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox time zone/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer in use!! Q28 remind you that pay more attention to TFD 11:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The information is in the revision history. Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 01:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:STV_Election_box_candidate2_with_custom_party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:State establishment decade-only century category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused category navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SeismicStructNavTemplate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused faux-navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Reversi diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused other than in 1 sandbox and 1 talk page and duplicates the in use Template:Reversi. Gonnym (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mancala 2x5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala 2x6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 0y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 1y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 2y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 3y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 4y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 5y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 6y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 12 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 14 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mancala hole 15 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above Mancala templates are all unused. The holes were replaced with a single Template:Mancala hole. Gonnym (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Good idea. I tidied up the merge target template and added some documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bowling-Stepladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused tournament bracket template. Gonnym (talk) 13:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Republic of China presidential elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was created today, but all the information it contains is already in either Template:Chinese elections (1912–49) or Template:Taiwanese elections. In general, I believe we treat the pre-1949 ROC government as a different entity from the modern government of Taiwan, and I don't see the value of a unified template which is on all the same articles as the above two templates.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Amakuru: The elections during 1949 and 1991 were not included in either template, and was created as they were indirect election which is a situation similar to Germany presidential elections. Two separate templates were created for German case. Cypp0847 (talk) 12:27, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• For reference: Template:German elections, Template:German presidential elections. Cypp0847 (talk) 13:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All links are already on the two templates. We don't need a third and any election article that isn't featured on either one should be added. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The elections during 1949 and 1991 were not included in either template as mentioned just above, and it is seemingly that indirect elections not adding to election template is a consensus on the Template:Taiwanese elections, as demonstrated in the aforementioned German example. Cypp0847 (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Unsorted list. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cleanup list sort (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Alphabetize (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (added as a merge candidate)
• Template:MOSLOW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (added as a merge candidate)

Unused, unclear usage ("sorted" how?) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant to {{Alphabetize}} or {{MOSLOW}}, depending on the situation. Both of those templates probably need better names, BTW. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment if the list is unorganized, any sort of systematic sorting could be intended, and thus suitable. Add a parameter to indicate what kind of sort is desired will fix the ambiguity problem, but it should be workable without one, since the cleanup editor can decide on a sort method (such as datesort) -- 22:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
• Probably keep and rename to {{unsorted list}}, and then merge in the other couple of templates. We don't fundamentally care how a list is sorted, but it is valid to call out that a list is indeed unsorted. --Izno (talk) 05:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused and merge the other two per Izno. Gonnym (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and tagging the other two templates for merge since the prevailing consensus currently seems to be to merge all of these into one "unsorted list" template.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are two motions emerging here; one for outright deletion and one for merging the three separate templates into one motion. In order to make that clearer, I have added in the other two templates to this nom.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).