The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HangonUse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Explaining how to use the deprecated {{hangon}} tag. This template doesn't have a use anymore and should be deleted. --Trialpears (talk) 22:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 27. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:0.7_set_nominee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lover (album) track listing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Even if transcluded into articles, it would just be for 4 songs, all of which are linked in the {{Taylor Swift songs}} navbox and the full track listing is readily available at Lover (album). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:09, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—NØ 09:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a needless duplication of song listings, plus there's a precedent against having these templates in the first place. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:30 de Febrero track listing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant navigation to the more complete {{Ha*Ash songs}} Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per my comments on the Lover tracklist template. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Originally a sub-template of {{Marriage}}, which has not used it for some years. I have just removed it from the seven articles that were its only use in mainspace (list on its talk page). Also buggy (again, see talk page) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems to be more problems than it's worth. It took me quite while to understand what it even was and was quite confused when looking at the articles that used to use it. There has been problems with the microformats and linter issues as well and no interest in using it as far as I can tell. --Trialpears (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 August 27. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kumkum_Bhagya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. Primefac (talk) 02:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikipediaOverview (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar rationale to {{ScienceNews}} below, but slightly different: again, not appropriate for article space – it was being used in project space in a couple instances, but I removed those partly due to the following problems. Collecting information like this in an essay or something might be okay, but this doesn't have any use as a template. The implementation is also mind-numbingly dense; it's just a wall of unformatted HTML/wiki markup; it doesn't include any sort of standard navbox meta-template; it links to a page in user space easter eggishly, etc... –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As OA of the {{WikipediaOverview}} template (also see template copy at original test site), I have no problem whatsoever with whatever consensus is reached with the template - original template was a personal study re template coding (& related) and, as such, may not be useful for an article after all - others may (or may not) agree that the template is useful in some way - Comments Welcome - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Thanks for the consideration. Drbogdan (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Userify If Drbogdan want it. Keeping it as is wouldn't be the end of the world, but I feel like user space would be more apropriate for reasons similar to those in WP:UBXNS. --Trialpears (talk) 23:26, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan, do you want these two moved to your userspace? czar 21:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: Thank you for your comment - and suggestion - I might just keep the templates as they are, at the moment - I may move them later however - Thanks again for your comment - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy to Drbogdan. These templates are not fit for use outside userspace, where the creator is free to experiment with them. czar 21:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: OK - you can move them if you want (I'm a bit unclear atm re your suggested move to my userspace; perhaps my template test site noted above, at "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drbogdan/sandbox-templates-04-WikipediaOverview", would suffice?) - in any case - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Trialpears: Thanks again for your comments - and help with this - created the following pages => "User:Drbogdan/WikipediaOverview" and "User:Drbogdan/ScienceNews" - should now be ok - please let me know if otherwise - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. Primefac (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ScienceNews (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Essentially unused (only on two user pages); can be kept in user space if really desired; doc suggests it's meant to be used on articles, but that would be very inappropriate. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As OA of the {{ScienceNews}} template (also see template copy at original test site), I have no problem whatsoever with whatever consensus is reached with the template - original template was a personal study re template coding (& related) and, as such, may not be useful for an article after all - others may (or may not) agree that the template is useful in some way - Comments Welcome - hope this helps in some way - in any case - Thanks for the consideration. Drbogdan (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Userify If Drbogdan want it. Keeping it as is wouldn't be the end of the world, but I feel like user space would be more apropriate for reasons similar to those in WP:UBXNS. --Trialpears (talk) 23:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Userfy to Drbogdan. These templates are not fit for use outside userspace, where the creator is free to experiment with them. czar 21:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: OK - you can move them if you want (I'm a bit unclear atm re your suggested move to my userspace; perhaps my template test site noted above, at "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Drbogdan/sandbox-templates-04-WikipediaOverview", would suffice?) - in any case - Thanks again for your comments - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Drbogdan: The idea is to move the entire template to User:Drbogdan/ScienceNews and then update the transclusions. --Trialpears (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Trialpears: Thanks again for your comments - and help with this - created the following pages => "User:Drbogdan/WikipediaOverview" and "User:Drbogdan/ScienceNews" - should now be ok - please let me know if otherwise - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).