The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:County routes in Genesee County, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:County routes in Niagara County, New York (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have merged the articles that this navbox serves the purposes of. No reason to keep them. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 20:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there was no reason to notify the creator, User:TwinsMetsFan. I know him well, he is never going to read it or comment. He is retired for good. Mitch32^{(The many fail: the one succeeds.)} 20:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. –Fredddie™ 20:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom as unused/unneeded. Imzadi 1979 → 00:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both - Per nom. Dough4872 01:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete useless templates.  VC  14:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:03, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Metadata population AT-0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have fixed the code in Template:Infobox Town AT to bypass this template. originally, when the key lookup failed, it would fallback with this template, but there were technical problems with that approach, which have been addressed in the infobox template. this one is no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:O'Higgins Supercopa Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Irrelevant template, not allowed through WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG guidelines. MYS77 ^✉ 14:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Kante4 (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:O'Higgins 2013–14 Apertura Champions squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Irrelevant template, not allowed through WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG guidelines. MYS77 ^✉ 14:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Kante4 (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Stagecoach Devon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, contains no links anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sputnik program (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, would fail WP:NENAN if used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This was the navigation template for the Sputnik articles when created in 2008. In 2010 the {{Orbital launches by year}} templates were created and added to the articles. Sometime in 2011 the Sputnik program template was removed from the articles (probably as no longer necessary) and doesn't seem to have been used since. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Spotlight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Spotlight working (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused, Wikipedia:Spotlight went defunct in 2008. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RealToons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no parent article. G8 declined. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• "No parent article" is not a valid deletion criterion. This is why I declined the G8. I have no other comment. --Izno (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  @Izno: "No parent article" is exactly what a G8 is. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  There are many navboxes without parent articles. G8 basically is never applicable. --Izno (talk) 11:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Text Santa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inappropriate for Navbox. Presenters fail WP:PERFNAV, remainder are charities that correctly do not have this template transcluded. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, basically article content hidden in a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Language with name2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-en-AU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-en-NZ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus here, but feel free to continue the discussion elsewhere. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Location map+ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I believe this template has been superseded by {{Location map many}} and so could be replaced by it. (Note that I am not proposing that the template be deleted immediately after the discussion ends; I am proposing that its transclusions be replaced by another template with minimal change in display.) Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The syntax of these two templates is quite different. The "many" version uses numbered locations which makes maps difficult to modify as you may need to renumber many of the locations. For example, it's quite easy to copy-and-paste locations between two "+" maps, and a lot harder to do it between two "many" maps (as you may need to renumber all the locations you copied). -- Dr Greg  talk  18:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• comment, Dr Greg makes a very good point. I do believe that (1) {{Location map+}} is less efficient than {{Location map many}} since it requires multiple module invocations, and (2) {{Location map+}} can be fragile since it requires specifying the name of the map multiple times, but (3) the whole numbering requirement for {{Location map many}} is a pain. one idea would be to create an alternative the same spirit as Template:Routemap so you could quickly generate these maps without the drawbacks listed above. Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Frietjes: Seems like a good idea; as few different separators as possible would probably be best for users (possibly \-separated entries one on each line, wherein the first and last entries are the name and the coordinates). This could also use Module:German coord convert. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 07:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-en-GB2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lang-en-US2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one Manual of Style page, meaning that these templates' inclusion does not reflect current practice and that they are unnecessary. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 06:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unnecessary. While "does not reflect current practice" doesn't apply here (these are utility templates for displaying something like "lorry (British English)" instead of "British English: lorry", and don't have anything to do with any prescribed practices), there's no need for them to exist as separate templates. Their functionality has been merged into the original templates (without "2" in their names) as a |paren=y parameter. So, just replace the extant uses of, e.g., {{lang-en-GB2|content here}} with {{lang-en-GB|content here|paren=y}} and delete the "2" versions of the templates.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  06:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Maile66. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

• Template:Joey B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one link which is an redirect which fails EXISTING. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 06:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn't aid navigation. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Orphan Black ratings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Normally graphs for such a series would be used, but it makes no sense to use a graph like this for this particular series, given the scale of the viewer ratings which are all under a million and lie under the single axis line; the template cannot be modified to add lines in for fractions. -- Alex^TW 04:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment AlexTheWhovian, would it not be better to modify the underlying graph template to allow for a better vertical scale? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: Yes, it would be, but how so? As I stated: the template cannot be modified to add lines in for fractions. -- Alex^TW 06:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: Nope. Broke {{Orphan Black ratings}}; Scale attribute 'increment' invalid. Specify positive integer. As I said, the template doesn't take fractions or decimals for intervals, the EasyTimeline extension's syntax doesn't support it. -- Alex^TW 07:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTheWhovian: I've made the module convert everything to thousands if maxviewers is equal to or less than 1.5 million. Should the statistics be allowed to be input in thousands? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's one way of fixing it. However, the consensus for the television project is to list viewer figures for series in the millions, even if no episode has yet breached one million (then we list three decimals instead of two). This means that the format for listing the viewers is now out of sync with List of Orphan Black episodes; that's why I didn't try something like this first. -- Alex^TW 07:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Despite the lack of functionality of the graph software, the conversion to thousands should suffice until someone figures out how to make the module draw the graphs in Vega instead. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 11:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The recent changes address the issue. - Brojam (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I accept that it should indeed be kept for now, until the recent changes are modified to restore the correct manner of using millions rather than thousands, for conformity, and until a better solution is put forward. -- Alex^TW 17:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Twin Peaks ratings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Makes no sense to use a graph like this for this particular series, given the scale, especially of the ratings of 1x01 compared to 3x03. -- Alex^TW 03:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and split it into two separate graphs, one for the 1990s series and one for the current series (since Wikipedia treats them as separate). Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 07:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Only include seasons 1 & 2. The season 3 comparison doesn't make sense. Seasons 1 and 2 were on primetime network television in the years before the cable boom and streaming services. Season 3 is on a premium cable network, and a lot of the people watching season 3 are streaming it. Twin Peaks is essentially airing on a different medium now. -- Danny (talk) 01:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Danny:  Done I guess this discussion can be closed now. -- Alex^TW 02:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RSN Organisation Chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused hardcoded ASCII chart from 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Quints by Surprise (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, everything links to the main article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Public Art article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused hardcoded template to create articles. No need. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC) keep per Redrose64. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}[reply]
  to reply to me 10:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
• It's "unused" because it's always WP:SUBSTituted. Examples included: Acton (Turrell); Chinese Souls; Eden II; Moulin Rouge: La Goulue; Reflections (Dove); Team Building (Align); The Flight of Europa; The History of Constantine; The Holy Family with the Dragonfly; The Love Song (Rockwell); and many more. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added {{subst only}} to the template. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me 10:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ProposedTransition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no proof that it was ever used. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pre-requisites (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlikely to be used, there are better templates that say the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 31#Template:Prerequisites. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• What are the better templates that say the same thing, TenPoundHammer? – Uanfala 00:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pokeanime (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused hardcoding from the ancient days; no foreseeable use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Please Add The Perfect Time (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, vastly improper in its formatting; if this is an issue, just use a better template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Photograph info (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template from 2005; we have much better templates that do the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Philadelphia Experiment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, navigates only two articles Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pfitzner operas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, would violate WP:NENAN if used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pfizer M&A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, just hardcodes a bunch of sources Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Personal thoughts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to {{Essay-like}} and other similar templates Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Pathfinder topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2014, everything on it is redlinked Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ParanormalTasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused to-do template, not updated since 2007. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, again as it has not been used. Doug Weller talk 14:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PageProperties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PageInfo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Omaha Wiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no reason to keep content from an old wiki that no longer exists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nota bene (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New Edition timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded timeline; unused now that we can make them on the fly Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, duplicates New Edition#Members and lineup chronology

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nationalhistory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific, overly wordy, unused. Talk page discussion from 2009 shows that it was never really supported and was considered confusing even then. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Musicals COTM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since 2008. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Motivational (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unlikely to be used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:More recent citation needed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't seem to be relevant anymore Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ludmilla (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and total WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:List of Pokémon episodes/Header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused transclusion of an old version of a list. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kamen Rider Hibiki (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, would blatantly fail WP:NENAN even if used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 06:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Justcurious (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The template is only 15 days old and is already used on at least 4 talk pages. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 02:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - much needed. ^{Atsme📞📧} 19:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^{Just curious...why delete it? It helps neutralize hard questions and is quite useful for that purpose. Atsme📞📧 19:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

• Keep. Potentially useful, and not breaking the wiki. --Tryptofish (talk) 01:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, add to Template:Done/See also, add standard {{Documentation}}. It seems quite harmless and essentially consistent with the various other comment / reply templates in that list. Heavy usage is not an expected characteristic of this type of template immediately after creation. Murph9000 (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Josh Sundquist (author) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to the main article; wouldn't even pass WP:NENAN regardless Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; pointless. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 16:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 16. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jeremy Sims (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jack City Shows (current and upcoming) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Investigation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template from 2005, doesn't appear to have ever been used either. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Intermediate-risk template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused protection template; there are better ones that do the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Informative template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; there are now much better templates that do the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• redirect to Template:Documentation, the template which replaced it. Frietjes (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox motor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't seem to be working anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Created in February and doesn't seem to have been finished. If an infobox is needed for electric motors at some point one can be created, and should be {{Infobox electric motor}} since there are other types of motors. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox horse trainer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; I don't think there are enough notable horse trainers to warrant their own infobox. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; unused. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as redundant to Template:Infobox horse person. there are clearly notable horse trainers but they are using Template:Infobox horse person instead. Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).