Gripweed(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Always interested in literature about arts and social science. Mostly working on German wikipedia in the fields of music, movies and WW2. --Gripweed (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ealdgyth(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Mostly work on historical subjects with a few art sidelines. Working on medieval English ecclesiastical history, medieval English noblemen, and horse history. Over 100 GAs and 50 FAs. Ealdgyth - Talk21:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sagaciousphil(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) This was one of the partnerships I suggested as I have often paid to gain access to articles on this excellent resource. It covers many of the areas I research - the most recent article I purchased provided a lot of extra detail about a little known, yet significant garden and has also proved useful in other articles. SagaciousPhil - Chat22:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
RolandR(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) History, humanities, regional studies. Particularly material related to the Middle East and Jewish and Muslim history, as well as general political history, and general arts and literature sources. RolandR (talk)22:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers (talk· contribs) Access to T and F would be useful to me both for content writing (animal science, arts, art history, music etc) and for copyright investigation. As a single example, this article might help to improve Add MS 29987. I no longer have university/ alumnus access. If available, I'd like access to both collections; if I must choose, then arts and humanities for preference. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mayooranathan(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I am working on Tamil Wikipedia continuously for more than 11 years now. I have done more than 35,000 edits and started more than 4000 articles. I am particularly interested in Arts and Humanities topics. If I get the access it will be useful for me to improve the existing articles and writing better new articles. --Mayooranathan (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Racconish(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Editor since 2008, 74,000 contributions of which 36,000 to the French project and 11,000 to the English project. I am particularly interested in articles on social sciences. Thanks, — Racconish 📥06:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
JimRenge(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I am editing articles on Buddhism and religion/demography. Access to Taylor & Francis would help me to verify content and improve references. JimRenge (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Zigzig20s(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have been editing and creating pages on Wikipedia every day for years. I already have access to Jstor and quote academic articles accordingly to improve or create articles. By having access to Taylor & Francis, I could add in-line references to more articles. I would focus on history, politics, sexuality studies.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Eric Corbett(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Almost 200,000 edits since 2006. Access to the arts and humanities journals would be particularly useful for the types of article I tend to write. EricCorbett13:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay in replying. Yes I will make active use of it, but my recent editing has been interrupted by blocks. EricCorbett10:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How strange - I looked on their website under Humanities yesterday and it was in that category - odd that it isn't in the collection. But yes, it's still useful on account of International History Review and Journal for Maritime Research, thanks. —Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 12:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I will. I look in almost every day to consult my massive watchlist and keep an eye on things (as my contributions will show). I had thought I'd mentioned something about hoping to get back into the swing of editing but apparently not, sorry. —Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 11:38, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Smallchief(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I'm a content creator with 16,000 edits on more than 1,000 articles. I primarily work on U.S. and Latin American history with forays into agriculture and geography. The Arts and Humanities collection would be of most assistance to me. User:Smallchief (talk)
Waynejayes(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have written 56 WP articles and have made over 5000 edits. Been a WP editor since June 2012. Active in editing Anglican bishops and priests, naturism, South African schools, south african history and biographies. Arts & Humanities collection please Wayne Jayes (talk) 11:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wasted Time R(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have been here for 10 years with 67,000 edits and around 120 FA/GA/DYK credits, most centered on politics, history, economics, and academia. A number of times I have run across quality sources at Taylor & Francis, so access to the Arts & Humanities collection would be of great help. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:25, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jnestorius(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Would like Arts & Humanities collection access. Editor since 2004; subject areas history, geography, and politics (mainly Ireland-related); and to a lesser extent linguistics and sport. I did some DYK work a few years ago but now I mainly work improving reference and balance on shorter articles, and modestly expanding stubs. 15:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
LaMona(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) This would help greatly with AfD and AfC questions about authors, artists, and humanities academics. I work mainly on BLPs and other person-related pages, and there is little material online for anyone not working in digital media. I can't match the >10K edits of some others here, but I attempt to do diligent research (I am a librarian). Most poorly written articles exhibit a lack of resources at least as much of a lack of notability. It's heartbreaking to see a potentially notable article come up at AfD and none of us has access to prove otherwise. I would mainly make use of the arts and humanities, and hope very much that T&F eventually give us access to information science, which I really need. LaMona (talk) 15:54, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Farrtj(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have edited Wikipedia for over 9 years and have 16 GAs to my name. I am withing the top 3000 Wikipedians by number of edits. My areas of interest are largely in business, literature and culture. There have been many Taylor & Francis articles I have wanted to access to improves Wikipedia pages which have been behind a paywall. Access to this resource would greatly increased my ability to improve articles. Tom (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jamesmcardle(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have created WP articles since 2006, and made many edits. My interest is in art, particularly in history of photography. Since retiring from University Research & teaching, my contributions have increased. sinarau (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
gilgamesh(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) i am active on hebrew wiki for more then 11 years. my main field of interest is ancient history and i wrote a number of featured articles on this top i need an access to a relible sourses in order to improve my articles and write a new ones. Gilgamesh (talk) 04:32, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
kdammers - I edit on archaeology, cultural anthropology, and the Classical world, i.a. T&F publishes material that I could use but do not have access to on my own.Kdammers (talk) 22:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sitush (talk· contribs) Would be used primarily for further work relating to history, society and politics of India/Pakistan, which has long been my main area of interest on en-WP. I also dabble in aspects of British history. I've invariably had to turn to WP:RX or off-wiki requests for info from this source and can only stretch goodwill so far, so tend to limit my requests. - Sitush (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Social History is one I have requested a few times. FICH and the Sikh studies one also stand out. It's not as useful to me as JSTOR, to which I am already signed up, but there are journals in that list which appear quite frequently as refs in other sources etc. - Sitush (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, since I've just realised that there are only 30 accounts available, I'll withdraw this. I'm sure that other people have greater need/I can try to make do with WP:RX for a while yet. - Sitush (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Requesting access to the arts and humanities database. Would be useful for a variety of historical subjects, cultural studies, media studies, communication, and philosophy topics. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 03:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
praeceptorIP(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I create articles in arts. humanities, history, law, science, computer related matters. I have about 1600 WP edits/contributiona, member about 8 years. Thanks. {[User:PraeceptorIP|PraeceptorIP]] PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Peacemaker67(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I am active writing on Yugoslavia in WWII mainly, have over 38,000 edits and often find there are history sources on TANDF which are inaccessible to me as I don't have access through a uni or similar. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 03:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
loupgarous (talk) 20:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)vfrickey(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I've edited and researched pages for about 12 years now (first edit on 11 December 2003) with over 500 edits. In attempting to find good secondary sources on the career and other notability of Irish cartoonist Kenneth Mahood, I found a reference in Taylor and Francis not available in other databases. I'd like access to Taylor and Francis because they have good coverage of contemporary literature, an interest of mine. I have in the past also found sources in Taylor and Francis that would have helped my editing and research efforts in military history (with emphasis on developments in the 20th-21st centuries). Access to these sources would help me make wikipedia a more dependable source of information. loupgarous (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Victoriaearle(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Just realized this is full, but adding my name to the list anyway for the future. I'm working an article right now that has material hosted on T & F (I might hit up someone on the list for those) and realized this would be useful. Contribs are somewhere around 50,000, almost all in the humanities, 23 FA articles. Victoria (tk) 18:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikkimaria: yes absolutely. I keep pulling up sources there I can't see, so it be lovely to have access. I'm still around, mostly adding sourced content, but not quite as quickly as in the past. Thanks for the ping. Victoria (tk) 00:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KAVEBEAR(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Active in Hawaiian, Polynesia and American history, though not exclusively. I have created two FAs, 9 GA and countless DYKS. I write historical biographies and I put researching and the best reliable sources above all so using Yaris resource would help me in creating more article.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Prioryman(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) This would be extremely useful for work both on the Africa Destubathon and more generally to assist with the many articles that I've worked on in the arts and humanities topic area. To date I have 18 FAs, 37 GAs and over 200 DYKs, with over 70,000 edits between two accounts. Prioryman (talk) 21:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Biological, Environmental and Earth Science
Sasata(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Would be great to have access to the Biological, Environmental & Earth Sciences collection–they have several journals related to my areas of interest here. See userpage for content creation work. Sasata (talk) 00:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cwmhiraeth(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I create and expand articles on biological topics and access to T&F's Biological, Environmental & Earth Sciences journals would be most useful (I have really appreciated having jstor access). Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fenix down(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Would appreciate access to the Earth Sciences collection. I have created a large number of articles in the human geography space, particularly on arctic Russia. Access would be extremely useful, particularly to have access to Polar Geography, a key journal in this area. Fenix down (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
nikkimaria - Is it possible to have access to both collections? looking at the humanities listings you have posted, I think that at least to of the journals on the A&H listing would also be very useful, specifically Russian Studies in History and Revolutionary Russia? Appreciate there may be a need to share out the accounts, so would prefer access to the Earth Sciences collection where I assume Polar Geography is found if this is not possible. Fenix down (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fenix down You can apply for both, but given the level of demand you probably won't receive both unless the partnership is expanded - we'll prioritize what you indicate is your preferred collection. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See the talk page - I don't have it at the moment but I've asked. We're also clarifying the distribution process and requests for both vs one collection with T&F. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kopiersperre(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I write articles about pesticides and other chemical topics at dewiki (16000 edits there). I'm not affiliated with any university, which could give me access. I'm particularly interested in the CRC books.--Kopiersperre (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Achim Raschka(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I am active in the area of biology in the german wikipedia since more than 11 years now and wrote a lot of featured and good articles mainly on zoology, anatomy and biographies but also a huge base in the area of natural sciences and other areas. My editcount is more than 90.000 edits in der German Wikipedia by now with ~50% on articles. Therefore I am very interested to get access to the Biological, Environmental & Earth Sciences collection. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WeijiBaikeBianji(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I edit high-page view articles and recently was a co-winner in the 2015 Core Contest for revisions to English language that brought that article to good article status. I especially like to edit articles on psychology. I share citations to sources that are reliable sources by Wikipedia guidelines with other editors in online bibliographies in my user space, for example the Intelligence citations bibliography and the Anthropology and human biology citations bibliography. It looks like the Taylor and Francis Biological, Environmental & Earth Sciences collection is the better fit for my research interests among the two subject collections currently on offer to Wikipedians. The Taylor and Francis Social Science and Humanities collection would be an ideal fit if it later becomes available. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ceyockey(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) My primary focuses in Wikipedia are a) combating link rot, b) providing some online resource availability for those citations which lack any linkage to internet resources, c) enhancing company information (via WikiProject Companies) and d) enhancing general scientific content based on recently published materials, particularly in the biological sciences. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 05:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nikkimaria: I took a look at the list. I'm familiar with the topics covered, but seldom edit in those areas. However, given access, I'll make a point of using it to enhance or create some articles. So, it won't go to waste. It's just a matter of topic emphasis for my editing. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apokryltaros(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I have been written numerous articles and made hundreds of thousands of edits since 2005. I focus primarily on prehistoric and extinct organisms, as well as some mythology, plant, fish and animal articles. I often search for scientific papers to help with my reconstructions of prehistoric organisms, and getting free access to Taylor and Francis articles will make my search and reconstructions so much easier.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keri(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Big user of The Wikipedia Library's partners, as my contribs will demonstrate. Also a member of WikiProject Environment. The Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences collection will be the most useful to me in creating, expanding and RSing articles, but I'm also interested in a specific T&F journal, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology - so if that falls under the other collection I'll be looking to collaborate with someone on the other list above :) Keri (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah well, not to worry, I'll get hold of it eventually :) The Bio/Env/Earth collection will probably keep me so busy that I'll forget why I wanted that law review in the first place ;) Keri (talk) 16:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kevmin(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) It would be great to have access to the paleobotanical and paleoentomological libraries for my work on writing articles on extinct insects/arthropods and plants. I do not have any exterior access to the ToF libraries and have over 20,000 edits, plus over 300 articles written.--Kevmin § 16:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Shyamal(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) would definitely help in my work relating to birds, insects and the environment. I do not have access to good enough physical libraries. Shyamal (talk) 10:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Melly42(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Would be a great help to create zoological articles with the zoological and paleontological papers provided by Taylor & Francis --Melly42 (talk) 08:49, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Danimations(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) These topics and titles are right up my alley- I edit pages related to marine biology, ecology and pollution and look forward to using your collection to enhance relevant WP articles. --Danimations (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers (talk· contribs) Access to T and F would be useful to me both for content writing (animal science, arts, art history, music etc) and for copyright investigation. As a single example, this article might help to improve Add MS 29987. I no longer have university/ alumnus access. If available, I'd like access to both collections; if I must choose, then arts and humanities for preference. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
JoJan (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC) I'm especially interested in the journal "Molluscan Research", as I am the founder and the main contributor in the WikiProject Gastropods, with more than 10,000 contributions in this field. JoJan (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IJReid(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I'm a member of the Dinosaurs wikiproject, and hundreds or thousands of related papers can be accessed through Taylor & Francis. With an account I could help verify and expand palaeontology-related articles on the wiki. I am quite active, and have many edits on wikipedia and other projects. IJReiddiscuss00:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Meloe(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I´m writig about biology, ecology and related issues in German wikipedia since 2010. Taylor and Francis journals are a main source of content in that area and would improve my work greatly.--Meloe (talk) 06:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Giantflightlessbirds(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email)I contribute to bird and snail pages, as well as doing Wikipedia outreach and training for museum workers and scientists; many of the journal articles I'm citing are T&F, and I work at an institution in a small city with no electronic journal access, and none at the local library or tertiary institution. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
scope_creep(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Working on German World War II military cryptography articles at the moment, including people and military, diplomatic, civilian organizations. These are some of them. B-Dienst, Cipher Department of the High Command of the Wehrmacht, Wilhelm Tranow, Pers Z SResearch Office of the Reich Air Ministry. Information for these articles are hard to find by definition, as they were secret by nature, so a lot of stuff you do find on the web is duplicated. Taylor and Francis has the Cryptologia magazine, which contain bagfuls of good salient info. Assuming this collection covers that period, and it's aligned with what I need. I can use the account for six months and hand it back, if needed. Scope creep (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is an example of an article I would like to source [[31]]. I can't locate the Strategic, Defence & Security Studies subject. The above article is within the Intelligence and National Security magazine, which may be a member of Defence...? Scope creep (talk) 14:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kges1901(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I do a large amount of work on Russian, Soviet and CIS military history, and having access to the Journal of Slavic Military Studies in this collection would improve articles as that journal has some useful articles. Kges1901 (talk) 08:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Buckshot06(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Work on a wide range of military and conflict issues worldwide: U.S., Europe, Middle East, Africa. Access would be really helpful. Previous work on the Russian military (such as previously getting Russian Ground Forces to Featured Article status), also Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FA), Liberia, Sierra Leone, etc benefited greatly from T&F journals, when I had previous access through work. It would be a great benefit to have such access assured. Buckshot06(talk)08:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nick-D(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I've developed 31 military-related articles to FA status, and am active in articles on modern miltaries and military history topics. I used many of these resources in articles when I had access to them through my university while completing a postgraduate qualification, and would like to put them to use again. The Military Balance would be particularly useful, as I used it extensively as a core reference for articles on modern military forces. This would be useful for updating "my" FA's on the Australian Defence Force and Timor Leste Defence Force, for instance. Nick-D (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Jbhunley(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) This would be a great help in adding and validating sources at new page review. I have a access to a good selection of material on my own but this would fill a hole. JbhTalk19:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Zigzig20s(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Very useful to add in-line references to existing articles and create new ones as I have been doing with other Wikipedia Library resources like Jstor, etc. I would focus on Africa and Israel.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Prioryman(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) I've been a prolific contributor on military articles, focusing particularly on military history (6 FAs, 6 GAs and numerous DYKs in that topic area). This would be extremely useful to help further that work, and also to improve referencing in existing articles. Prioryman (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
JFG(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email) Veteran wkipedian. Current areas of activity include spaceflight, astronomy, geopolitics and music. I am passionate about digging out precious nuggets of information to broaden the coverage of complex topics beyond what is popular in the news. — JFGtalk10:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wasted Time R(talk· contribs · central auth ·count· email)) Longtime contributor with 68,000 edits and 135 total FA/GA/DYK credits. I got an account a year and a half ago for Arts & Humanities but I think it may have expired. In any case, lately I have been working on articles about international relations doctrines, security studies, and the academic institutions in this area, as well as biographies of U.S. ambassadors. So having access to the Taylor & Francis journals in the Strategic, Defence & Security Studies area would be very helpful (they often seem to have articles that JSTOR does not). Wasted Time R (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]