• Wng4699 (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts have exclusive interest in the article Rape myth, and both showed up at nearly the same time. They are each re-adding the same content. [1][2][3][4] Note that the edit summary in the last one describes bringing back a paragraph, but it was the other account that actually brought back the paragraph - this one merely modified it.

Wng4699's different citation style in their earlier edits is likely an act, as that account later switches to the correct style. Additionally, much of the content these accounts are adding has problems like WP:Synthesis, WP:Editorializing, and so on.

Requesting CU for stronger confirmation and to turn up sleepers. Crossroads ^-talk- 03:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DeltaQuad, what are you seeing that behaviorally suggests they are different users? How do two separate people just happen to show up at some random article within 2 days of each other, and edit war over the exact same content? And WP:MEAT is still under WP:SOCK. Crossroads ^-talk- 06:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I checked for different reasons, but I see enough to suggest behaviorally they are different users. That said, they are  Inconclusive headed directly towards  Unrelated if there wasn't any potential confusion. Given this, I'm closing w/o action. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]