Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Devoter/Archive


Devoter

Devoter (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

08 May 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

When I nominated a biographical article on a Turkish-born British businessperson created by IntelisMust for AfD, they didn't find this fair and evidently tried very hard by spamming links and whatnot to prove his notability on AfD. Like another editor who voted "delete", I've started having some concerns on COI, because that when [they] see the news in TV, decided to write a page on him doesn't add up with someone starting to get aggressive on two disagreeing users. When I've pointed that out, IntelisMust, a relatively active user, stopped editing altogether. Their last edit is from April 19. A dismissive comment in Turkish from a 0-edit IP geolocating to London a day later only strengthened my suspicions on COI.

Weeks later, two editors, Hkkingg and Hukumat Namanzoor consecutively voted "keep" repeating IntelisMust's arguments. But I wasn't truly suspicious on sockpuppetry, until I found out some interesting details that tie these accounts together, other than their comments on the AfD:

  • The userpages of all three are very simple with just one sentence in each: [1][2][3].
  • Their interests are mostly on Indian and Pakistani people. They all create biographical articles, many of which get nominated for AfD with COI/PROMO concerns. They vote "keep" with similar reasons by spamming links and pointing out the person won "awards": [4][5][6]
  • Their edit summaries are very similar, almost always following an Object + Verb order instead of Verb + Object: [7][8][9][10] IntelisMust and Hukumat Namanzoor even make edits with the exact same summaries:
  1. "1 link added""1 link added" Aintabli (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. "details added""details added""details added""details added"
  3. "page published""page published and sent for submission""page published"
  • There is quite a bit of overlap in how Hukumat Namanzoor and IntelisMust approach other editors. Both ping the editors on their own talkpage and mention how and why they started the article with an emphasis on that they are not paid editors: [11][12]

This list is not exhaustive. I would be happy to provide more evidence if necessary, especially from their talkpage entries. Aintabli (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another 0-edit London-based IP promptly replied to an editor's comment on possible sock/meatpuppetry on the AfD page. [13] Added both IP's to the sock list. Aintabli (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hukumat Namanzoor has changed their name to "Devoter". This is not the first time they renamed their account, see User talk:Maj Gen PA. Aintabli (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


16 May 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

This account was created one to two days after the confirmed socks were blocked. This user voted keep and made almost the same argument on the AfD page the sockpuppets had commented on before. They have a similar userpage with just one sentence as the other socks. The way they spelled the Muslim greeting as-salamu alaykum there is almost exactly the same as the way IntelisMust spelled it on my talkpage. Although this is a new account, they jumped right into AfDs, which currently constitutes all of their edits. They're not even trying to make this not obvious. Aintabli (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

A month-old account similarly interested in biographies of South Asian people and makes small changes to articles with simple summaries often involving a object + verb order, such as "Articles inserted", "preposition corrected", article added, and so on. (In previous reports, this was a prominent common feature between the confirmed socks.) More suspiciously, they have responded to a welcome message on their talkpage:

Hi! Thank you for a warm welcome. To tell you the truth, as I saw an alert, I got scared that I have been caught for some wrongdoing. Pleasantly surprised to see a welcoming note. Cheers!

Aintabli (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CU puts them in broadly the same location, but they are using a completely different set of IPs. I guess it could be the same person, but it seems unlikely. I don't see any disruption - all of the contribs I checked were clearly improvements to grammar and punctuation, so I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt. Closing without further action. Girth Summit (blether) 10:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

I had previously reported Hkkingg, but the CU evidence turned out to be inconclusive. @Spicy: mentioned that they were suspicious of Hkkingg overall, but there wasn't enough evidence. To be honest, at first, I was a little bit unsure, but now, I'm close to confident:

  1. Both IntelisMust (confirmed sock) and Hkkingg have a specific way of attempting to prove notability of articles they have created by "spamming" links on AfD nominations: [14], [15], [16], [17]
  2. Hkkingg is the only one who was not blocked for sockpuppetry on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemal Polat to vote "keep". (Note Shaikha Habiba, although their comment was not struck, was also blocked due to sockpuppetry.)
  3. Hkkingg tried to circumvent community's recent decision to delete Muhammed Majeed, an article they created, by creating it again under a slightly different title Muhammed Majeed (scientist) (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Majeed (scientist) for more information.) In the previous AfD discussion for Muhammed Majeed (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Majeed), it is safe to assume that Hkkingg tried to create an artificial consensus by voting "keep" logged out: An IP geolocating to India, like Hkkingg, voted "KEEP" in all capital letters and the same IP additionally edited Hkkingg's own talkpage: [18][19][20] Overall, Hkkingg doesn't appear to be a person with the urge to abide by Wikipedia's rules, just like IntelisMust/Devoter. Just in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemal Polat, we have 3 confirmed sockpuppets voting "keep". And one of them, Shaikha Habiba, was created right after when IntelisMust requested to be unblocked and evidently lied that CU evidence was a mere coincidence: [21][22]
  4. Hkkingg stopped being active after May 7, when they voted "keep" together with other sockpuppets on Cemal Polat's AfD. Then, between May 7 and 22/30, many of the confirmed sockpuppets were active: Devoter, Shaikha Habiba, IntelisMust. Hkkingg wasn't. Between June 14 and 24, Karmelhi was active. Hkking still wasn't. And on June 26, Hkkingg is back to editing.
  5. All of this is in addition to a great overlap in these accounts' interests, which are biographies of Indian people, all of which were often noted with possible WP:COI and WP:PROMO.

I have also added Karmelhi here, because:

  1. As pointed out above, Karmelhi, already an account I was suspicious of, stopped editing on June 24, and on June 26, Hkkingg became active again.
  2. There is a great overlap between this and previous accounts, per previous report. Aintabli (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not surprising that every aforementioned editor suspected of sockpuppetry declared that they are not paid editors, although most other editors, even IPs, have shown concern:
      • On 22 May, Hkking said: I would like to add that I am not an employee of the company or associated with them. I am simply a fan of this project and have been following it since the start. (Someone else did not believe Hkking and pointed at possible COI, PROMO, and so on.)
      • On 19 April, IntelisMust said: When I see the news in TV, I decided to write a page on him. (Despite apparent COI, PROMO per the AfD of Cemal Polat, as noted by several editors.)
      • On 19 November the previous year Devoter said: I created the draft two weeks ago No COI and no Paid to edit. (...) I was covering NYFW 2022 and saw this celeb and few others, When I searched Wikipedia I couldn't see her hence I decided to create article on her and few more celebs.
    • Hkking and other suspected parties in this case have accused other editors of being enemies when they noticed the promotional nature in their edits:
      • On 22 May, Hkking said: It seems to me that this project has a lot of enemies
      • On 10 May, after an editor showed concern on sockpuppetry (confirmed by this investigation), an IP (Devoter), out of nowhere, responded: surely you have a personal agenda against this individual
    I believe these to be poorly disguised quacks from a WP:DUCK I've initially missed in my first report. Aintabli (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Previous accounts are stale. The activity at AFD and the linking style is quite suspicious, although I'm undecided to act based on it. The account has just a few edits and has been inactive since this report was filed, so I'm no Closing without action, but feel free to re-open if it is active again and there is new evidence. MarioGom (talk) 17:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24 July 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

LOUTSOCK requested undeletion of their pages at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 July 24 and also posted this comments against me. For the record, this guy has issued me several off-wiki physical threats as well. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the master account is Dj1kamal. @Dj1kamal was attempting to create a PORMO BLP for DJ Kamal Mustafa per this. There are some other accounts listed here that also attempted to create a BLP for DJ Kamal Mustafa. I also have a strong feeling their other account are Memon KutianaWala and Static Hash because of their similar editing patterns such as this, this, this and this, this, this, this, this and this (hxxps://emeatribune[.]com/ DJ Kamal is founder of EMEA Tribune - see footer).

I would also appreciate knowing who created these BLPs on DJ Kamal Mustafa, Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker), Kamal Mustafa (DJ) - the director/producer/writer of this short film Operation Swift Retort (short film)/Operation Swift Retort (film)/Operation Swift Retort (2019 Film). And I'm unsure what's this about?Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib: Here you go. (Note that all of this is publicly-available data, though getting at it is obscure and inconvenient.) The creation by Tassedethe was a page move. —Cryptic 02:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cryptic, Thanks! So it appears that most of the creators of these pages are either SPAs or socks listed on this SPI. @Memon KutianaWala, has been identified as DJ Kamal Mustafa Dj1kamal, and the evidence has been submitted to ArbCom.Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
182.190.221.33 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) The IP address continues to threaten and abuse. --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
title creator timestamp
DJ Kamal Mustafa User:Rosemaryujoh 2015-06-13 19:10:48
DJ Kamal Mustafa User:FalakShabbir2 2015-10-09 07:12:16
Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker) User:Singhyala 2015-11-21 18:37:10
DJ Kamal Mustafa User:Hajisattar 2016-02-13 14:28:27
Kamal Mustafa (DJ) User:EmraanHashmiNawab 2016-08-30 12:19:25
Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker) User:103.12.120.122 2018-03-14 16:50:31
Operation Swift Retort (film) User:Memon KutianaWala 2019-09-08 14:13:49
Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker) User:Memon KutianaWala 2019-11-22 13:29:00
Operation Swift Retort (film) User:Memon KutianaWala 2020-01-14 09:57:41
Operation Swift Retort (film) User:Static Hash 2021-03-11 08:50:49
Operation Swift Retort (2019 Film) User:Tassedethe 2021-05-02 23:48:38
Operation Swift Retort (short film) User:Devoter 2023-05-05 09:51:32

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I have two more IPs to inform, as it looks like this is the same person. 202.47.52.131 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 182.190.220.97 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 17:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 August 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

I’m aware that @AboutMoiB is currently blocked, but I’m recording this here for future reference. @ST47: Can you please confirm the master account. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments