Suspected sockpuppets

• Nrambeck (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An activist-editor is trying to add cherrypicked negative quotes into the article Margaret Sanger and is more or less editwarring and POV-pushing over it. This edits, Bob Enyart, is know as activist against planned parenthood. Unfortunarely for him, he does not get much help in getting the negative quotes into the text (about 2 for, 3 against). Suddenly, out of nowhere, a new user arrives on the talkpage stating his support for the changes. Next thing he does is a revert to reinstate the quote under discussion. Very advanced edits for a new user.

Interestingly, Nramback shows up as Nathan Ramback as somebody who interviews Enyart about the "American Right To Life"-team. So without doubt he is at least a meatpuppet, but maybe more. The Banner _talk 17:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'm new to Wikipedia editing, but this term Sockpuppet indicates the same person using multiple accounts. This CheckUser request doesn't even make that accusation. The accusation that I know BobEnyart is true. It should be obvious that I am not trying to deceive anyone since, instead of using an anonymous username, I use my regular username used widely on the internet so anyone can identify who I am. If there is a rule against contributing to the same article as someone you know, that rule certainly isn't intuitive. Nrambeck (talk) 02:14, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Likely, especially given BobEnyart's propensity to "forget" logging in to support his position. — Coren ^(talk) 19:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Sock indeffed and master blocked for a week. Closing. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]