Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/60.230.156.127/Archive
60.230.156.127
60.230.156.127 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
20 April 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
For about the last month I have had almost daily harassment by this serial sock ip user, who has also been previously blocked (temporarily) under 2 of these ip addresses by User:LessHeard vanU (1, 2). It began with him repeatedly using multiple ip's to place offensive White Army Propaganda Posters on my user page seen ---> here, here, and here (which subsequently had to be locked down) and since has spread to every sort of general harassment (i.e. WP:HOUND) you could think of. As for evidence, (1) All of his ip addresses have the same Latitude/Longitude geolocation of -37.814251 / 144.963169 in Melbourne, Australia, (except for one yesterday - 58.167.41.120 - where he ostensibly used a computer in with a Latitude/Longitude geolocation of -38.219106 / 145.038199 in Mornington, Australia). (2) All 13 of his ip addresses' ISP's are from Telstra Internet and (3) He now returns daily with a new ip address and makes the same reverts of me as the day before. I was hoping he would tire himself out and thus didn't file anything before now, but in the last few days he has really ramped it up and now follows most of my edits, reverts nearly everything I post, and has even made random reverts on my own talk page. As a result of his harassment of me, I have placed a template warning on all of his ip talk pages, but he has also tried to conceal these. Is there any way to block these 13 ip addresses, and possibly instill a range block? In the nearly 3.5 years I have been editing here, I’ve never come across anything like this before. Thank you. Redthoreau -- (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: There's really no feasible rangeblock I saw, sorry. Elockid (Talk) 19:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Clerk note: Not that I see either. I would be willing to discuss an Abuse Response case with the user, but would recommend stopping by my talkpage or emailing me. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)