Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chellaney
- Chellaney (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Harshray (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Legaleagle86 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: A
- Supporting evidence: Same vandalism interest on a very specific article and very specific content. The editor Chellaney vandalized specific information from the article for which the editor was warned. After restoring and warning, the IP appears and the very first edit from it is vandalism of exactly the same article and information. This vandalism was caught, reverted and warned by ClueBot and then a very soon a new account Harshray appeared whose very first edit on wikipedia is vandalizing exactly the same content as done by Chellaney and IP within a few days of the first vandalism. ClueBot caught this again], reverted and warned Harshray. Harshray vandalized the same content again. I've reluctantly added Legaleagle86, because I myself somewhat doubt he is among the other three, but he seems to have problems with the same report and had deleted it from other article. --Roadahead ★ 05:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- While the blatant vandalism from Harshray continues, another IP Roadahead ★ 20:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC) has appeared on the same article (forgot to log on?). I'm adding this IP to the list as well to check the possibility. --
Likely that Chellaney, Harshray and the IP are the same user. Very Unlikely that LegalEagle86 is involved. [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 15:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk note: blocked the users indef (except LegalEagle86), the IPs for a week. -- lucasbfr talk 10:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
In email, HR asserts he is a colleague of C, not a sock. I decided to believe him and set the block on HR to 24h (for 3RR). I've left the C account alone, err, though it doesn't make sense for it to be blocked as a sock of the other if the other isn't also blocked. Ah well William M. Connolley (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Bill, in that case HR is meatpuppet of C because HR is deleting over and over again - the same sourced content and from the same article. --Roadahead ★ 17:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)