The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/6/0); ended 16:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC) by non-bureaucrat Neurolysis per NOTNOW

fuzzyhair2 (talk · contribs) – Vote me in!

Okay, fine. I have a wierd name. So what? That can't prevent me from sucess. I think I should be like an admin. I will edit and create pages like neva before! I lot of people like me. I think you should too. --Fuzzyhair2 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I want to take part in creating pages and preventing "bad language". There are a lot of kids out there that use Wikipedia. It pops up in almost every search engine.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contribution to Wikipedia is the ecomotions. I added plenty of new ones.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I hane not been in any conflicts over editing. Swearing over Wikipedia is stressful. I had enough of the day. I wish to delete them and notify the contributer.

• Links for Fuzzyhair2: Fuzzyhair2 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Fuzzyhair2 can be found here.

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Fuzzyhair2 before commenting.

• WP:NOTNOW? GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 15:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose. Couple dozen edits, total. Needs a couple thousand more and several more months of content-building and admin-related experience. Apparently unfamiliar with our policies of citing sources. Basically, a "not now" case. Tan | 39 15:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose per not now. Thanks for the enthusiasm Fuzzyhair, but you'll need a lot more experience at Wikipedia before applying for adminship. Please see this page for more information. All the best, FlyingToaster 15:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Oppose Not now. --Neskaya _talk 15:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
4. Oppose per "I just wandered across RfA and I have a compulsion to vote". Get a better feel for the place before you decide that adminship is what you really want :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Because trust me: it's not nearly as fun and/or exciting and/or powerful as you may think it is[reply]
5. Oppose You created two RfA pages: "Fuzzyhair2" and "fuzzyhair2", so you obviously don't understand how this process works. You need to get a few more months of experience before applying. GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 15:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   Also, I don't like the fact that you have added the {{User contrib|600,000}} userbox to your user page as you have less than 100. GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 16:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6. Oppose: the lack of experience worries me, too. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 16:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.