The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

(talk page) Final (0/1/0); ended 20:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC) - —GƒoleyFour— 20:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Per WP:NOTNOW[reply]

Ankitkool1988 (talk · contribs) – It is my pleasure to nominate myself for adminship. I have edited some articles and I still can do many if provided to do so.

Though, I have made less edits since I first started editing in February 2009.

Frankly, I don't see any compelling reason to deny me the tools. I am a knowledgeable, experienced user who isn't interested in creating drama but simply helping out at some administrative venues. I hope the community will come to the same conclusion to which I arrived: it's time.

Ankitkool1988 (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: I would ensure as an administrator, that the most true and correct to depth information is available on Wikipedia. My first and foremost work shall be to deal with Vandalism which is a big issue for a Editor-controlled encyclopedia. Though, Wikipedia is managed very well, but I would be happy to serve as an active part of Wikipedia Foundation as Administrator.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Though, I have not made more edits to Wikipedia, but if granted the tools, I can ensure speedy deletion of Vandalism articles, fast dealings in sock-puppets cases and Copyright policies cases. As an administrator, I would ensure Wikipedia remains a clean and knowledge full source of information.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Well, whenever i am in a conflict over deletion matters, I myself verified those information and then concluded afterwards. In most cases, the decision of Wikipedia Admin was final and binding so, no conflict appeared. Thanks for support, Wikipedia Admins!!

• Links for Ankitkool1988: Ankitkool1988 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Ankitkool1988 can be found here.

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

• Edit stats posted to talk. Baseball Watcher 20:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose Per WP:NOTNOW and experience. Baseball Watcher 20:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.