This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 15, 2025.

• Pet Supermarket → MedicAnimal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There's a chain of pet stores in the United States called "Pet Supermarket", which I'm wagering is an entirely different organization than the (former?) UK chain that this redirects to the purchasers of. This link should either be disambiguated or redlinked with Pet Supermarket (UK) linking to MedicAnimal. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The Bushranger: Am I understanding you correctly in assuming one of the options you are proposing is that the nominated redirect be deleted and then Pet Supermarket (UK) be created? If so, that causes essentially a WP:PRECISE issue since the disambiguated version of the title "Pet Supermarket" would exist but the non-disambiguated version would not, which would almost be guaranteed to result in this nominated redirect being recreated anyways Steel1943 (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually, keep per my above comment and there being no other articles to disambiguate against that have been identified yet. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • At the moment though it falls under, IMHO, WP:EASTEREGG as I suspect most viewers searching for "Pet Supermarket" will not be expecting the UK store. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Bottom dweller → Benthic zone  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This strikes me as a term with uses broader than life forms at the literal bottom of the ocean. BD2412 T 21:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Other than the usage for life forms at the bottom of the ocean, a Google search only yields results for a song and a Yu-Gi-Oh card. Aprzn (talk) 04:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Interstitial fauna → Meiobenthos  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Interstitial" is not mentioned at the target, and I think the term may be ambiguous with Microfauna. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interstitial fauna are those "Animals that inhabit the spaces between individual sand grains. The term is often used synonymously with meiofauna, mesofauna, and microfauna" (source) I assume interstitial fauna include both meiofauna (45 μm to 1 mm) and microfauna, but not larger fauna. Meiofauna is probably the best target but not ideal. The Interstitial disambiguation page has "Interstitial fauna, small aquatic invertebrates, larger than microfauna but smaller than macrofauna" (unsourced), which might be an alternative target, but has been proposed for deletion.  —  Jts1882 | talk  15:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Interstitial space (biology) → Extracellular fluid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Interstitial region → Extracellular fluid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target does not mention "Interstitial space" or "Interstitial region", and the expression may be ambiguous: perhaps not all interstitial spaces are filled with fluid. My instinct here is to delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Interstitial space (biology) → Interstitium. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Ah this seems like a good idea, I agree with the idea to retarget per Hyphenation Expert. I created this in 2008 and don't actually care what happens to it. Seems like an unlikely redirect, but hey, they're cheap right? delldot ∇. 20:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget Interstitial region → Interstitial. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Lifelore → Biology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Biology is about life, however this term seems odd. Biology used to have a #Etymology section that had: Historically there was another term for "biology" in English, lifelore; it is rarely used today. Later the entire #Etymology section was removed as: etymologies belong in wiktionary., and the suggestion was that these should go into a History section or a "History of" article, however this was not added back to Biology § History or History of biology. Without context, this redirect is confusing, as evidenced at another two RfDs for Life lore and Life-lore. Jay 💬 11:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Anti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook → Facebook#Anti-Muslim propaganda and Hindu nationalism in India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

closing and immediately reopening, as the redirect is semi-protected. nominated here by an ip with the rationale being "more accurate", with the proposed targets (so rusalkii assumes, at least) being belief bias and islamophobia (baked into the nomination for some reason) and accompanied by pings of users luizpuodzius and xavier1824 (the latter of whom has been inactive for almost half a year and has 39 edits as of writing this). if someone can make sense of this, i welcome your attempt consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• until then, keep, as that's a good part of the title of the section it targets to (just missing "and hindu nationalism"), and the other proposed targets (or whatever they were) don't even mention facebook. maybe even speedy keep in absence of a coherent nomination, but i can't say much because i'm no stranger to making those myself. the ip has some really weird contribs too, what's that about? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: the IP will need to elaborate more on how the proposed new targets are "more accurate". When someone types "Anti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook" into the Wikipedia search box they would almost certainly be looking for an article or article section covering Islamophobic propaganda specifically on Facebook, and not an article on the general topic of Islamophobia or belief bias.
  IP is definitely in the right place bringing this redirect to RfD to propose a potentially controversial retarget; edit-warring over it is what has resulted in the semi-protection. In general, follow WP:Bold, revert, discuss when an edit you've made is reverted and you want to make that edit again. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't writer in english, but Criticism of Facebook and Islamophobia_in_the_media#Social_media are new possibilities. AP 499D252804:14C:5BB1:9473:2AA4:3307:B22B:ECE4 (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that's actually a pretty good thing to get out of the way. still, i disagree, as i think a reader looking for something under this specific title would want a section about anti-muslim stuff on an article about facebook. criticism of facebook doesn't really go in-depth about it, and islamophobia in the media isn't necessarily just about facebook consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2025–26 Big Bash League season → Big Bash League  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete this future season not mentioned even trivially in the main article. Similar nomination as the January 2024 RfD, where it was deleted. It has been recreated twice since, as redirect to the same target, and deleted the first time as a WP:G4. An attempt to make this an article was reverted as the article you have here has virtually no infomation in it. i suggest we certainly wait until the current afd about the 2026 and 2027 ipl seasons is complete Jay 💬 09:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Fine by me as the person who reestablished the redirect, but it'll need watching properly and squashing each time then Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, or preferably convert into an article. That will be created in a few months anyway when the full season details are released, but there has already been a lot of coverage of the retained players and unlike previous years, they have already held a Player Movement Window this year. There is enough for an article already for a tournament that absolutely will take place before the end of this year. The-Pope (talk) 04:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and protect: a protection should keep it from being turned into an article before time. Vestrian24Bio 11:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Brave Books → Kirk Cameron  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Brave Books is mentioned on the article, since the company published a book by Cameron. However, Brave Books is also mentioned on articles about other authors such as Chaya Raichik, Dinesh D'Souza and Kash Patel, so there would be more than one potential target. I've found some significant coverage of the publisher, so a red link could incentivize article creation in case more good sources are found. ObserveOwl (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe add mention to Conservatism in the United States or a similar article and retarget there? Orchastrattor (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about that, conservativism in the country seems like a very broad article topic. I thought about including it on the list of publishers of children's books, but each entry requires that an article is written first, according to the edit notice. ObserveOwl (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's already a basis for a subtopic of "American conservative literature" with Ayn Rand or other authors, the article does cover a wide topic but I'd say that's somewhat reflective of how wide the authorship is, as you pointed out. Orchastrattor (talk) 01:49, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Les Dix Commandements → Ten Commandments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete per WP:FORRED. Phrase not mentioned in the target article, and the target article's subject had no affinity to the French language. Steel1943 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered that Les Dix Commandements (musical) exists, meaning it may need to be moved to the nominated redirect's title per WP:PRECISE if the nominated redirect is deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate "Les Dix Commandements" 1979 composition by Alexandre Tansman; "Lex Dix Commandements" 1998 album listed at List of best-selling albums in France; "Les Dix Commandements" 1910s 10 volume series by Émile Faguet; and the 2000 musical and its album Les Dix Commandements (musical) -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Disambiguation draft requested per 65 (giving this new template a whirl) BugGhost 🦗👻 09:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Move musical to target per Steel, since none of the others have articles and hatnote to the drafted DAB. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic? IP 65 has drafted a disambiguation page at the redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The drafted DAB looks good to me. Let's go with that. Fieari (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Banu Hoot → Banu Hut  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Usage does not exist anywhere on the internet aside from this redirect. Page was at this title for all of two minutes. Rusalkii (talk) 05:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: What is confusing is that it is referred to in the article as Banu Hout, so should the article be moved to Banu Hout? There are other redirects Banu Houth and Banu Haut. Jay 💬 09:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There are several very rapid moves in the history, I'm nowhere near qualified to determine which is the correct name. Rusalkii (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Video clip → Music video  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

While this is mentioned in the target article, and this should definitely not be deleted, I don't believe that this is the primary topic. Potential disambiguation or retarget? -1ctinus📝🗨 14:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• So, in French, and I imagine probably some other languages, the English loanword clip is how you say 'music video'. I wonder if that's contributed to the decision to move the longstanding article at this title to Video clip (online media) and retarget the redirect. Either way, it's clear there wasn't consensus for that, so reverse move; send to RM if necessary. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 17:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Reverse the move per above. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Short-form content, along with the plural. CheeseyHead (talk) 20:47, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the current and suggested targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Reverse move per Tamzin. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural close this and take up the reverse move / WP:RM outside of this RfD. I did not realize it during my relist, but Video clip (online media) too was moved, to Short-form content. Jay 💬 20:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Reverse both moves and send to RM. Nickps (talk) 22:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a messy situation, but I think the least disruptive option is just to send Short-form content to RM at its current title and let them deal with it there given it's been moved twice (one of which was during this RFD), and the structure of the content there has changed significantly. For now, it's probably best to target the redirect there while it plays out so older links to the article still point there, and if the Short-form content title is kept, this can be re-nominated at RFD. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:34, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also pinging @Tamzin, Utopes, CheeseyHead, and Patar knight: to notify them that Video clip (online media) has been moved to Short-form content, which may impact their opinion on what should happen. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:34, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I would reverse all the moves as not uncontroversial and then start an RM. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate between Music video and Short-form content. The context is important, so I don't think there is a primary topic. Another benefit to disambiguation is that it may be useful to have links cleaned up. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:32, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I would also be fine with disambiguation, at least for now (I would nominate Short-form content at RM if disambiguation is the result of this RFD). Reverting the moves as controversial feels damaging with how much the article has developed since the moves. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Involved relist to close an extremely old log page and to try and get some more eyes on this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nobody is going to search up "Video Clip" trying to find "Music Video". Those are two different things. LarryL33k (Contribz) 04:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate "video clip" and "clip" was used in the 1990s in Canadian English as a synonym for music video -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:55, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Finario → The Bonnie Lass o' Fyvie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete as ambiguous with Damian of Finario and Battista dei Giudici. These three minor details do not between them warrant a disambiguation page, and search results will do the job quicker and more simply than hatnotes. J947 ‡ ^edits 02:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or disambiguate The other two are "surname-type" uses, while the current target is an alternate name. If kept, we can hatnote the two people pointed out by the nom -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 21:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:33, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. We have three entries, none of which is an obvious primary target. Tevildo (talk) 16:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and let search results help. The current target subject is known as "Fennario", not "Finario". Jay 💬 17:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Struck per Tavix. I missed reading the part in the target that talked about permutations like "Fennario", "Fernario", "Finario"... Jay 💬 20:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep and hatnote per Patar knight. Jay 💬 06:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Disambiguation draft requested * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Cremastra (u — c) 22:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems to be entirely PTMs and passing mentions without enough substance anywhere. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the article attests Finario as a permutation of the alternative title Fennario. I agree the other uses are WP:PTMs so there's not enough to disambiguate. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus still does not seem clear...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Tavix. Cremastra (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and hatnote to Finale Ligure, which was historically known as Finario. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 19:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Patar knight has brought up a fourth target, which makes me feel that disambiguation is the correct option. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 19:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It's still a WP:PTM, since those two people were from Finale. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, yeah, I'd be fine with keeping and hatnoting to Finale Ligure. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Involved relist to close an extremely old log page and to try and get some more eyes on this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 22#Sharqi Arabic